Tenable Nessus vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Tenable Nessus
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Tenable headquartered in Columbia offers Nessus, a vulnerability scanning and security assessment solution used to analyze an entity's security posture, vulnerability testing, and provide configuration assessments.
$2,790
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions.N/A
Pricing
Tenable NessusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Editions & Modules
1 Year
$2,790.00
1 Year + Advanced Support
$3,190.00
2 Years
$5,440.00
2 Years + Advanced Support
$6,240.00
3 Years
$7,951.00
3 Years + Advanced Support
$9,151.00
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Tenable NessusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Tenable NessusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Considered Both Products
Tenable Nessus
Chose Tenable Nessus
Comparing other products, Nessus has a lot of plus points. Not only for PCIDSS, Nessus is great for other compliance bodies such as HIPAA, NIST etc.
Chose Tenable Nessus
We looked at AlienVault since it can be a SIEM and scanner all in one. Ultimately, we decided AlienVault didn't stack up well against Nessus so we decided to purchase Nessus. Glad we did.
Chose Tenable Nessus
Sometimes when we identify a vulnerability with Nessus that has an exploit, we made a proof of concept with Metasploit in order to show to the IT managers the importance of the software/hardware hardening.
Chose Tenable Nessus
Tools like Qualys, Rapid7 stack up well against Nessus, but I think Nessus is superior overall when compared to them, given the features it has.
Chose Tenable Nessus
Nessus is much easier to use.
Chose Tenable Nessus
Nessus is standard vulnerabilities assessment tool, i would recommend for mid or higher level organization to have their personalised tool from Nessus for day to day managing of their network security with continuous improvements.
Chose Tenable Nessus
Nessus is the smallest product in the Tenable stable and is also the first vulnerability scanner to be created almost 20 years ago. Great tool for once off scans. But you need the other products if you want real time monitoring etc
Chose Tenable Nessus
Defender provides lots of insight into missing patches and vulnerabilities on Windows devices but doesn't provide much help for other platforms.
Chose Tenable Nessus
Ease of deployment and use even for junior analysts, strong plugin support, and up-to-date CVE coverage, cost-effective licensing, especially for mid-size companies, and seamless integration with the SIEM tool. Overall, Nessus hit the right balance between functionality, …
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
This can be particularly beneficial for organizations with large and complex networks, as it simplifies the management and monitoring process. Trellix ePOoffers a range of customization options.. It allowing IT teams to tailor the solution to meet their specific needs.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator really seemed to have all the best pieces in one platform and the network admin and asst. network admin both had previous experience with the product. The others tend to focus more on singular aspects, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has data …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
If you are using Microsoft Services or newer, cloud ones, it can be worth [it] to try their services but it may be very expensive because of the licensing thing and here Microsoft is very tricky and very difficult to decide the right one.
MalwareBytes is good product and adds …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
I have used Symantec Endpoint Encryption before. Symantec and EPO are both good in their own ways. EPO allows integration of other McAfee products. I have been using ePolicy Orchestrator for years. I have a lot of experience with the product. That is why I like it.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Trend micro-endpoint management, Symantec/Norton AV
Compared to these, McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator provides a much more robust and extensible all-around deployment and ongoing management solution.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
We selected McAfee EPO partly because we were already using McAfee VSE, but mostly because there are very few other AV management packages out there that offer the same level of enterprise management tools. That's where it really shines - deployment and management of AV in a …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
The price and the licensing options are very good. We were able to negotiate our pricing with plenty of flexibility ePO is one of the best administration console in the security world. Capability of deep customization are one of the biggest advantage. Ability to run PDF …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
I think McAfee is a strong competitor and holds up well when compared to other software of its kind. If McAfee antivirus is already being used then it makes sense to go with this product to add another layer of management to the network.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
McAfee plays well in not only scanning the endpoint machines like the data which is shared through disks or pen drive but it also helps in internet security. With its wide range threat source it blocks users entering into malicious sites and also blocks suspicious things which …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Other products that were reviewed were Symantec's DLP and Forcepoint. The reason we ultimately went the ePolicy Orchestrator route was that we owned other McAfee products and the logic way to bring them together and to gain the maximum information was to bin them together with …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
We have not evaluated any other products in a very long time because moving to another AV product suite would be a very costly and long process. Another AV product would have to provide a very large cost reduction, performance improvements and unknown threat finding. We …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

We were using Vipre Anti-virus for years and switched to McAfee. We gained better insight into our environment. Management felt more secure knowing that at any moment we could bring up reports into what was going on in our environment.

McAfee ePO was able to give us time back …

Features
Tenable NessusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Tenable Nessus
5.1
Ratings
43% below category average
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
6.6
Ratings
18% below category average
Network Analytics8.20 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Threat Recognition4.50 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification8.20 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting1.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Threat Analysis5.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting7.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification1.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
Tenable Nessus
8.0
Ratings
1% below category average
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
6.0
Ratings
30% below category average
IT Asset Realization9.10 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Authentication9.10 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring9.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Web Scanning4.50 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence8.20 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Tenable NessusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Small Businesses
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Tenable NessusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Tenable NessusTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
Nessus is perfectly suitable for performing comprehensive vulnerability assessment scans being a vulnerability scanner. It is less appropriate for performing penetration testing since it is not a penetration testing tool, it does not have the ability and modules to exploit the vulnerabilities of the system.
Read full review
McAffee ePolicy Orchestrator is very well suited in large environments. You can load your updates to the repository and deploy them to every node on your network. It has great reporting and auditing features. You can control your users and groups all from the System Tree. DLP is great for USB devices. You can restrict all the ports on a computer and open them up for a limited time to plug in a device. EPO is to bulky for small networks.
Read full review
Pros
  • Shows you how to fix certain vulnerabilities and the commands to run.
  • Gives you the CVEs that the vulnerabilities are matched to.
  • Easy to understand the vulnerabilities list, giving reasons why the issues need to be patched or fixed.
Read full review
  • Applies the policy settings for the selected group
  • Keeps the hosts updated well, in general
  • Allows update of available software from within the management console
  • Assigns and runs ongoing tasks with little need for intervention
  • Provides quick high-level view of systems
Read full review
Cons
  • Could use an upgrade within reports.
  • Scans can take a long time to complete. Have to break them down in small sections.
Read full review
  • It has a slow mechanism when adding custom threat feeds. For example, if McAfee didn't have a signature or detection about a new virus and we try to add it to our console it is like a really big process in adding that to our available signatures.
  • Whenever a scan is performed, the system CPU utilization goes up 100 percent.
  • Installation fails due to difference in timestamp when we try to shuffle between packages.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Nessus is best and easy to use application for Vulnerabilities finding and reporting, it has multiple platforms and wide scope covering almost all devices for security improvement so far, thus we are very likely to continue its services.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Tenable Nessus is a great product and provides a lot of value, but it is difficult to set up and use and the amount of data it generates can be overwhelming. It does help us prioritize based on the severity of the detection, however there are sometimes mitigating factors that we have implemented that Nessus does not account for, which causes lots of noise in the reports.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I haven't needed to contact support yet. But issues are easily solved with a quick internet search which means support and by extension, the larger community are involved and knowledgeable.
Read full review
McAfee support is definitely GREAT! It is one of the best technical support on a business level. GOLD support is recommended to business. Their website is easy and quick to create a ticket. Their technical team usually responds right away with an email or call. Via call and web they provide a full and complete support until the issue is resolved. The best, most of the time they explain in detail what is the issue, the reason and how to resolve it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Ease of deployment and use even for junior analysts, strong plugin support, and up-to-date CVE coverage, cost-effective licensing, especially for mid-size companies, and seamless integration with the SIEM tool. Overall, Nessus hit the right balance between functionality, performance, and total cost of ownership for our needs and usability.
Read full review
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator really seemed to have all the best pieces in one platform and the network admin and asst. network admin both had previous experience with the product. The others tend to focus more on singular aspects, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has data loss prevention, encryption, anti-virus and other functionality and the excel on each of those points equally.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has helped identify security flaws in our infrastructure that has helped better secure our client's data. It did so quickly and efficiently so I was able to move on to other tasks.
Read full review
  • As with most things the price of products goes up and more-so if your business is growing.
  • We've been able to provide auditors with tangible evidence that our network is protected because of the reporting McAfee ePO provides. Auditors like McAfee because it's been around almost forever and is a mature product.
  • Being a mature product, though, it's very much set in the way it does things and as such there's not a whole lot of innovation.
Read full review
ScreenShots