Tenable Security Center vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

Tenable Security Center

Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Tenable Security Center	Score 8.1 out of 10	N/A	Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) from Tenable Network Security in Baltimore, presents a vulnerabiliy management option used to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk to businesses. It is managed on premises.	N/A
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator	Score 6.8 out of 10	N/A	Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions.	N/A

Pricing

Tenable Security Center

Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Tenable Security Center	Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Tenable Security Center	Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Considered Both Products	Tenable Security Center Verified User Anonymous Chose Tenable Security Center Tenable.sc [(formerly SecurityCenter)] has been around for a long time and in our opinion offered the easiest configuration for compliance scanning and it's rating system was more impressive than Rapid 7's. Incentivized Helpful? Chandan Singh Rathore Senior Technical Consultant Chose Tenable Security Center Tenable.sc can be installed so easily within an hour or so and it has user-friendly GUI with inbuilt industry-based customizable reports i.e. HIPAA, GDPR, ISO standards, etc. It also includes a configurable workflow engine that helps to speed up response and remediation, reduce … Incentivized Helpful? Ahmet Fatih IRKLI Cyber Security Specialist Chose Tenable Security Center My organization is strictly prohibited from using cloud services. Tenable.sc offers cloud service but we needed on-premises services. Therefore, Tenable.io was eliminated by Tenable.sc. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tenable Security Center None, N/A Incentivized Helpful? Joevanne Velez Senior IT Security Engineer Chose Tenable Security Center We decided to go with Tenable due to its robust reporting capabilities and competitive pricing vs its competitors. While all tools are very similar in regards to scanning capabilities we prefer Tenable SC's user interface. We also like the option to have both on-prem and cloud … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tenable Security Center We selected Tenable because is one of the best solution at the moment. Tenable is a powerful tool that we use for validation of our patching methodology. This is very helpful if you are only patching what the vendor deems as critical and then with this external validation you … Incentivized Helpful?	Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator Farukh Alam Technical Engineer Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator This can be particularly beneficial for organizations with large and complex networks, as it simplifies the management and monitoring process. Trellix ePOoffers a range of customization options.. It allowing IT teams to tailor the solution to meet their specific needs. Incentivized Helpful? GG Gus Gilchrist Asst. Network Admin Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator really seemed to have all the best pieces in one platform and the network admin and asst. network admin both had previous experience with the product. The others tend to focus more on singular aspects, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has data … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator If you are using Microsoft Services or newer, cloud ones, it can be worth [it] to try their services but it may be very expensive because of the licensing thing and here Microsoft is very tricky and very difficult to decide the right one. MalwareBytes is good product and adds … Incentivized Helpful? AI Angel Iani Cyber Security Engineer Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator I have used Symantec Endpoint Encryption before. Symantec and EPO are both good in their own ways. EPO allows integration of other McAfee products. I have been using ePolicy Orchestrator for years. I have a lot of experience with the product. That is why I like it. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator Trend micro-endpoint management, Symantec/Norton AV Compared to these, McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator provides a much more robust and extensible all-around deployment and ongoing management solution. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator We selected McAfee EPO partly because we were already using McAfee VSE, but mostly because there are very few other AV management packages out there that offer the same level of enterprise management tools. That's where it really shines - deployment and management of AV in a … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator The price and the licensing options are very good. We were able to negotiate our pricing with plenty of flexibility ePO is one of the best administration console in the security world. Capability of deep customization are one of the biggest advantage. Ability to run PDF … Incentivized Helpful? Ashley Babiarz Service Delivery Leader Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator I think McAfee is a strong competitor and holds up well when compared to other software of its kind. If McAfee antivirus is already being used then it makes sense to go with this product to add another layer of management to the network. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator McAfee plays well in not only scanning the endpoint machines like the data which is shared through disks or pen drive but it also helps in internet security. With its wide range threat source it blocks users entering into malicious sites and also blocks suspicious things which … Incentivized Helpful? PC Philip Clarke IT System Manager Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator Other products that were reviewed were Symantec's DLP and Forcepoint. The reason we ultimately went the ePolicy Orchestrator route was that we owned other McAfee products and the logic way to bring them together and to gain the maximum information was to bin them together with … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator We have not evaluated any other products in a very long time because moving to another AV product suite would be a very costly and long process. Another AV product would have to provide a very large cost reduction, performance improvements and unknown threat finding. We … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator We were using Vipre Anti-virus for years and switched to McAfee. We gained better insight into our environment. Management felt more secure knowing that at any moment we could bring up reports into what was going on in our environment. McAfee ePO was able to give us time back … Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Tenable Security Center

Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

Threat Intelligence

Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
	Tenable Security Center 9.6 Ratings 19% above category average	Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator 6.6 Ratings 18% below category average
Network Analytics	10.00 Ratings	5.00 Ratings
Threat Recognition	10.00 Ratings	6.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification	9.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting	10.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Threat Analysis	10.00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting	10.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification	8.00 Ratings	6.00 Ratings

Vulnerability Management Tools

Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
	Tenable Security Center 9.6 Ratings 17% above category average	Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator 6.0 Ratings 30% below category average
IT Asset Realization	10.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Authentication	8.00 Ratings	5.00 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring	10.00 Ratings	6.00 Ratings
Web Scanning	10.00 Ratings	6.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence	10.00 Ratings	6.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Tenable Security Center	Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Small Businesses	Action1 Score 9.5 out of 10	Action1 Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Action1 Score 9.5 out of 10	Action1 Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Tenable Security Center	Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (0 ratings)	7.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	9.4 (0 ratings)	8.2 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Tenable Security Center	Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend	Tenable.sc is best suited for those organizations who are not very comfortable with Cloud and want an on-premises solution. If any organization has to follow some guidelines that no data should go to the cloud, in this case, Tenable.sc is a perfect fit as it's installed in the infra Datacenter and no data goes to Cloud. Tenable.sc won't be appropriate for those who have their infra setup on cloud. Incentivized Chandan Singh Rathore Senior Technical Consultant Read full review	McAffee ePolicy Orchestrator is very well suited in large environments. You can load your updates to the repository and deploy them to every node on your network. It has great reporting and auditing features. You can control your users and groups all from the System Tree. DLP is great for USB devices. You can restrict all the ports on a computer and open them up for a limited time to plug in a device. EPO is to bulky for small networks. Incentivized AI Angel Iani Cyber Security Engineer Read full review
Pros	Vulnerability management from one place Maximum endpoint visibility Easy to set up and plan the structure Support desk quickly responses Well-prepared documentation Broad scanning type Supports various compliance standards User groups allows coordination between teams Ahmet Fatih IRKLI Cyber Security Specialist Read full review	Applies the policy settings for the selected group Keeps the hosts updated well, in general Allows update of available software from within the management console Assigns and runs ongoing tasks with little need for intervention Provides quick high-level view of systems Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Tenable could make it easier to report on missing reg key. Tenable can also make it easier to report on os level patches vs application patches. Incentivized Joevanne Velez Senior IT Security Engineer Read full review	It has a slow mechanism when adding custom threat feeds. For example, if McAfee didn't have a signature or detection about a new virus and we try to add it to our console it is like a really big process in adding that to our available signatures. Whenever a scan is performed, the system CPU utilization goes up 100 percent. Installation fails due to difference in timestamp when we try to shuffle between packages. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	based on product capabilities and usage Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	On all of the occasions that I have had to reach out to Tenable for assistance, they have been extremely helpful and knowledgeable. Solutions and support are provided quickly, and they work on the issue until it is resolved. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	McAfee support is definitely GREAT! It is one of the best technical support on a business level. GOLD support is recommended to business. Their website is easy and quick to create a ticket. Their technical team usually responds right away with an email or call. Via call and web they provide a full and complete support until the issue is resolved. The best, most of the time they explain in detail what is the issue, the reason and how to resolve it. Incentivized TM Tiago Mokwa IT Senior System Network Administrator Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Tenable.sc [(formerly SecurityCenter)] has been around for a long time and in our opinion offered the easiest configuration for compliance scanning and it's rating system was more impressive than Rapid 7's. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator really seemed to have all the best pieces in one platform and the network admin and asst. network admin both had previous experience with the product. The others tend to focus more on singular aspects, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has data loss prevention, encryption, anti-virus and other functionality and the excel on each of those points equally. Incentivized GG Gus Gilchrist Asst. Network Admin Read full review
Return on Investment	Create internal/operational efficiencies Improve compliance & risk management Cost management Solid vulnerability scanner Ease, of use, and capabilities when it comes to analyzing vulnerabilities is what makes this product stand out Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	As with most things the price of products goes up and more-so if your business is growing. We've been able to provide auditors with tangible evidence that our network is protected because of the reporting McAfee ePO provides. Auditors like McAfee because it's been around almost forever and is a mature product. Being a mature product, though, it's very much set in the way it does things and as such there's not a whole lot of innovation. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots