Tenable Vulnerability Management vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Vulnerability management specialist Tenable offers their cloud application and container security platform Tenable Web App Scanning (formerly Tenable.io), a vulnerability management tool that emphasizes visibility of web applications, automatic scanning, and a unified view of cloud infrastructure and possible inconsistencies indicating a vulnerability.N/A
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions.N/A
Pricing
Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Considered Both Products
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Chose Tenable Vulnerability Management
I think Tenable and Qualys have a lot of similarities, I continue to go back to Tenable because of my familiarity and comfort level with it. I've also used a company called SecurityMetrics which has vulnerability scanning included but it is not as comprehensive as Tenable.
Chose Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable.io was a clear winner in regards to features and capability when compared to OpenVAS, Qualys, and Nexpose. OpenVAS is a fork of an older version of Nessus Scanner(from Tenable) and has been updated over the years to a great free alternative. It takes a lot more manual …
Chose Tenable Vulnerability Management
Skipping since I don't have too much familiarity with similar products.
Chose Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable.io has a comparable set of features, with excellent support and a competitive price. After less than desirable experiences with another company, we moved to Tenable and haven't looked back since.
Chose Tenable Vulnerability Management
Rapid7 is actually very comparable to Tenable.io in terms of automated scans, automated reporting, internal and external scanners, and remediation of external scans. But for less than the cost of a Rapid7 solution that comes with internal scans only, I received more hosts …
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
This can be particularly beneficial for organizations with large and complex networks, as it simplifies the management and monitoring process. Trellix ePOoffers a range of customization options.. It allowing IT teams to tailor the solution to meet their specific needs.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator really seemed to have all the best pieces in one platform and the network admin and asst. network admin both had previous experience with the product. The others tend to focus more on singular aspects, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has data …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
If you are using Microsoft Services or newer, cloud ones, it can be worth [it] to try their services but it may be very expensive because of the licensing thing and here Microsoft is very tricky and very difficult to decide the right one.
MalwareBytes is good product and adds …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
I have used Symantec Endpoint Encryption before. Symantec and EPO are both good in their own ways. EPO allows integration of other McAfee products. I have been using ePolicy Orchestrator for years. I have a lot of experience with the product. That is why I like it.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Trend micro-endpoint management, Symantec/Norton AV
Compared to these, McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator provides a much more robust and extensible all-around deployment and ongoing management solution.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
We selected McAfee EPO partly because we were already using McAfee VSE, but mostly because there are very few other AV management packages out there that offer the same level of enterprise management tools. That's where it really shines - deployment and management of AV in a …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
The price and the licensing options are very good. We were able to negotiate our pricing with plenty of flexibility ePO is one of the best administration console in the security world. Capability of deep customization are one of the biggest advantage. Ability to run PDF …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
I think McAfee is a strong competitor and holds up well when compared to other software of its kind. If McAfee antivirus is already being used then it makes sense to go with this product to add another layer of management to the network.
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
McAfee plays well in not only scanning the endpoint machines like the data which is shared through disks or pen drive but it also helps in internet security. With its wide range threat source it blocks users entering into malicious sites and also blocks suspicious things which …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Other products that were reviewed were Symantec's DLP and Forcepoint. The reason we ultimately went the ePolicy Orchestrator route was that we owned other McAfee products and the logic way to bring them together and to gain the maximum information was to bin them together with …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
We have not evaluated any other products in a very long time because moving to another AV product suite would be a very costly and long process. Another AV product would have to provide a very large cost reduction, performance improvements and unknown threat finding. We …
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

We were using Vipre Anti-virus for years and switched to McAfee. We gained better insight into our environment. Management felt more secure knowing that at any moment we could bring up reports into what was going on in our environment.

McAfee ePO was able to give us time back …

Features
Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Tenable Vulnerability Management
8.4
Ratings
6% above category average
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
6.6
Ratings
18% below category average
Network Analytics10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Threat Recognition10.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting4.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Threat Analysis10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting5.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification10.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
Tenable Vulnerability Management
8.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
6.0
Ratings
30% below category average
IT Asset Realization8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Authentication10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Web Scanning8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence10.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Small Businesses
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
Tenable.io is a cost effective Internal and External scanner. The Internal scanner came with a .ova, so it was very simple and quick to deploy it into our ESXi environment. It has a cloud-based dashboard for management and the internal scanner is configured to auto-update from Tenable.io. The license came with 4 External PCI scans (with remediation) a year.
Read full review
McAffee ePolicy Orchestrator is very well suited in large environments. You can load your updates to the repository and deploy them to every node on your network. It has great reporting and auditing features. You can control your users and groups all from the System Tree. DLP is great for USB devices. You can restrict all the ports on a computer and open them up for a limited time to plug in a device. EPO is to bulky for small networks.
Read full review
Pros
  • Wide range of capabilities that can be customized to fit each user's environment and needs
  • Provides high-quality data and insights into detected vulnerabilities
  • Great customer support
Read full review
  • Applies the policy settings for the selected group
  • Keeps the hosts updated well, in general
  • Allows update of available software from within the management console
  • Assigns and runs ongoing tasks with little need for intervention
  • Provides quick high-level view of systems
Read full review
Cons
  • Configuration is not always intuitive, but the comprehensive training and documentation comes to the rescue.
  • The mix of classic and beta UIs currently is confusing and we find the classic UI is actually better.
Read full review
  • It has a slow mechanism when adding custom threat feeds. For example, if McAfee didn't have a signature or detection about a new virus and we try to add it to our console it is like a really big process in adding that to our available signatures.
  • Whenever a scan is performed, the system CPU utilization goes up 100 percent.
  • Installation fails due to difference in timestamp when we try to shuffle between packages.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We like to renew tenable each year we have had it so far.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Overall it is good, it took a little while to understand it and figure things out but once you have a good grasp on it then, it is very good.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Support is usually really great at walking you through any steps you need to take when you get stuck on something. There are a few false positives and errors that have come up over the years that required their help to get through. Unfortunately, the steps required to diagnose some problems are more tedious than I think should be necessary. (IE: SQL instances can throw errors that clog up your logs because one plugin affects it in a certain way. The process to diagnose this is to watch timestamps of plugins in a log while monitoring the SQL logs at the same time and using your best guess as to what is causing it.)
Read full review
McAfee support is definitely GREAT! It is one of the best technical support on a business level. GOLD support is recommended to business. Their website is easy and quick to create a ticket. Their technical team usually responds right away with an email or call. Via call and web they provide a full and complete support until the issue is resolved. The best, most of the time they explain in detail what is the issue, the reason and how to resolve it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I think Tenable and Qualys have a lot of similarities, I continue to go back to Tenable because of my familiarity and comfort level with it. I've also used a company called SecurityMetrics which has vulnerability scanning included but it is not as comprehensive as Tenable.
Read full review
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator really seemed to have all the best pieces in one platform and the network admin and asst. network admin both had previous experience with the product. The others tend to focus more on singular aspects, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has data loss prevention, encryption, anti-virus and other functionality and the excel on each of those points equally.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We're able to mitigate over 90% of our vulnerability risk without too much effort. It helps find where automated patching fails and we can plan a fix from the findings.
  • A side effect of our scanning reveals new devices on our network that aren't cleared to be.
Read full review
  • As with most things the price of products goes up and more-so if your business is growing.
  • We've been able to provide auditors with tangible evidence that our network is protected because of the reporting McAfee ePO provides. Auditors like McAfee because it's been around almost forever and is a mature product.
  • Being a mature product, though, it's very much set in the way it does things and as such there's not a whole lot of innovation.
Read full review
ScreenShots