Modern Campus CMS vs. Terminalfour Digital Engagement and Web Development Platform
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Modern Campus CMS | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Modern Campus CMS (formerly Omni Campus) is a CMS for institutions of higher education. It can be deployed as a cloud-based service or hosted locally. It is built in Java, uses open standards, and is extensible through APIs. | N/A |
Terminalfour Digital Engagement and Web Development Platform | Score7.8 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | TerminalFour Site Manager is the principal product from the global software company of the same name, a content management system available for local-hosting or cloud-based, primarily targeted at educational institutions, government and international bodies, but also retail and financial services organizations. | N/A |
| Modern Campus CMS | Terminalfour Digital Engagement and Web Development Platform | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | $15,000 organisation per year | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Generally the initial cost is between $15,000 to $100,000 with ongoing support and hosting subsequent years. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Modern Campus CMS | Terminalfour Digital Engagement and Web Development Platform | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Platform & Infrastructure |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web Content Creation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web Content Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Modern Campus CMS | Terminalfour Digital Engagement and Web Development Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.4 | - |
| Usability | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 9.1 | - |