TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText UFT One vs. TestComplete

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText UFT One

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AUnified Functional Testing (UFT, formerly known as HP UFT and before that QuickTest Professional or HP QTP) is a functional and performance testing tool acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, now from OpenText.N/A

    TestComplete

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ATestComplete is a GUI test automation tool that enables users of all skill levels to test the UI of every desktop, web, and mobile application. TestComplete is best suited for testers, automation engineers, and QA teams in any industry.

    $2,256

    per license

    Pricing
    OpenText UFT OneTestComplete
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Node-Locked Base
    2,256
    per license
    Node-Locked Pro
    3,950
    per license
    Float - Base
    5,077
    per license
    Float - Pro
    7,901
    per license
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText UFT OneTestComplete
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPay for only the modules needed. TestComplete Pro includes all three modules: desktop, web, and mobile, at a bundled price point, as well as access to the parallel testing engine, TestExecute. TestComplete has additional add-ons, including TestExecute and the Intelligent Quality Add-On.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText UFT OneTestComplete
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    Chose OpenText UFT One

    We need to look at open source tools if the team has time to learn like Selenium.

    Selenium can integrate with just about anything to give you a robust framework such as Maven for source code compilation, Test NG to drive tests, Jenkins or Hudson to integrate into a Continuous …

    Incentivized
    Chose OpenText UFT One
    Most of the test tools are similar in nature to what they do. Every tool has its own quirks, making them necessary to understand how and what they do, before we get to start using them; which also happens to be the key to good automation testing. Considering the HP toolset, …
    Incentivized
    SmartBear
    Chose TestComplete
    I know from using other tools in the past years that TestComplete could be more cost-effective, yet still get the job done.
    Incentivized
    Chose TestComplete
    [...]
    Incentivized
    Chose TestComplete
    Very close evaluations on all tools
    Incentivized
    Chose TestComplete
    I have used UFT, Katalon Studio.
    UFT has robust object recognition engine than TestComplete.
    For example, Katalon Studio supports Groovy and Java so it is easier for programmers/testers to automate apps in java as it is a popular language, but TC doesn't support it.
    Incentivized
    Chose TestComplete
    UFT, TOSCA, and open-source Selenium/Cucumber based. The ease of use with TestComplete is comparable to TOSCA, but it is a lot cheaper and allows for a better ROI. UFT is better at recognizing elements and different technologies based on Java. TestComplete is easier to set up …
    Incentivized
    Chose TestComplete
    It's a great tool with a lot of in built features and support for cloud. In the market, there are many test tools available and there are many open source tools too. But this tool has some unique features which fair well.
    Incentivized
    Chose TestComplete
    • Good image handling techniques, object repository, CI
    • Bug tracking integrations will be a good opt for test complete
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    OpenText UFT OneTestComplete
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (11 ratings)
    7.0
    (88 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.1
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.8
    (7 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.6
    (7 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.7
    (4 ratings)