GTreasury vs. TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions)

It is well-suited for providing information about what cash is available and its future outlook of it. It helped us to link the multiple bank accounts that we have globally into one consolidated location. We were then able to ensure that we had the cash required to meet the various business needs that we have.

Incentivized

With this robust treasury tool it is very easy to increase the speed of financial operations with, for example, outgoing payments and cash flow analysis management. Liquidity is not a problem thanks to Treasury Intelligence Solutions, we are confident in this tool to fulfill the most important operations of outgoing payments. I can also recommend it because it is very simple to use and it also has a very simple application.

Incentivized

• Reporting automates bank balance view(s) by sending daily email recipients.
• [It] includes the GL account coding on the funding templates to automate the posting of JEs for that transaction.
• [It] synergizes bank transactions via a single portal rather than multiple logins for multiple bank platforms.

Incentivized

• Bank connectivity is as simple as it can be. Well designed making a complex process a little less complex than other providers.
• Transaction support across 15 countries has been Steller. Broad support for methods and formats and issues were resolved quickly.
• Solid systems interface make connecting with ERP and other systems relatively painless.
• As noted earlier, quite flexible for a hosted service.

• IHB should be created as a separate module and not be spread out across multiple functions
• CAMT script that is currently used should be replaced by an actual plugin
• Reporting module needs to be more user friendly and allow users to extract larger data sets
• An ability to view a bank statement on-screen w/o extracting it into PDF would go a long way. Different from Balance Explorer.

Incentivized

• User-friendliness in some areas could be improved. A function that explains buttons would be nice, similar to how it is in SAP with F1. But indeed you can find this on the support portal.
• It is missing the Business Discovery Manager. This will solve many questions, so I cannot complain if we are missing a critical dashboard part of TIS. The logic of Master data and download of the same is done nicely. I would like to build my own report with this, but we would be back to BDM functions.
• The BTM transaction monitor is its greatest strength, but also is a large jungle of entries. You can get lost in there. The deletion function should be upgraded if possible, [because] it's not the easiest to do a mass deletion.
• Filtering of accounts that need to be assigned to the BANK link. It's only a small thing but can be super annoying every time it selects the first bank entry by default.

Incentivized

[I feel] it's too hard to use and navigate around [and] very difficult to manage/administer. We may keep it because [I feel] we [have] already gone through the pain point and don't want to risk going through that again. Unfortunately, if we keep it, [I believe] it's not because we love it.

Incentivized

Depends on stage of the project if it will be postponed in 2023. Se la vie. Will be happy to go on.

For me, reporting is very important and I just don't find it very user-friendly. [To me,] the location of certain functions is also confusing which I resort to using the search function. [In my case,] I have had two conversations with two different people in GTreasury and they both also agreed with me on this. They also said to just use the search function. [I believe] a lot of the reporting areas could be updated and made better. [I feel that] unless you have had a lot of training, a user would have a very hard time customizing reports. [In my experience,] even GTreasury employees agreed with me on this one.

Incentivized

The main feature of usability is the outcome you get upon actions done. TIS is not complecated solution - it is rational and has most needed capabilites for cash management via multiple accounts in different jurisdictions. It works well for this task and evolutioning to the field of risk management to get all treasury job done well.

Day-to-day support is very quick and responsive. However, if you need to go the second level it might take longer and you lose the visibility.

Incentivized

Offered support information in the portal (knowledge base articles) as well members of the support provides a very good service level.

Incentivized

The training addressed our needs.

Incentivized

Weekly meetings and updates a plus Set realistic timeline expectations Have a good project manager Make sure everyone is following the same time line and dependencies list Keep track of a future state or out of scope list You may need to change the scope and do a project request form change, that's OK if you determine a key function has been missed Don't be afraid to extend the timeline to make sure through testing has been done prior to going live Document set up decisions, how reports and worksheets work, and why certain user codes are or are not in the positioning reports.

Incentivized

The cloud connection meant less work for IT. The setup of the first 1000 accounts was very quick, so we went live after only 4 months.

I have used Orbit and Kyriba in the past. Orbit from [a] previous company. It was fairly user-friendly even though it does not have all the bells and whistles. What I liked most about Orbit is the customer service. Everyone was very responsive. We chose GTreasury because we all agreed it appears to have everything we needed. The demos we received looked great and looked easy to use. The reporting function seemed very robust. The account manager assigned to us at the time, Jake, was great. He was very responsive and helpful. His responsiveness was also one of the reasons why we probably went with GTreasury because we felt like we had someone advocating for us.

Incentivized

The implementation team is strong and supportive of your needs which was important. The solution fit the needs of company very well with many ERP systems and bank accounts. The company was continuing to improve its product based on customer feedback. Strong IT background at the top

Incentivized

• Very positive ROI allowing us to take our daily cash target down to 1% of total admitted Assts. Prior to GTreasury we were running close to 20%.
• Reduced bank service cost initially by $300,000+ and annually a minimum of $50,000.
• Allowed us to maintain and streamline Treasury Staff FTE level, with the ability to train other areas for self service payment research, so the Treasury Analyst can focus on value added analysis tasks.

Incentivized

In terms of risk mitigation of course we can reduce the number of people having access to banking if not needed. With dedicated teams and less people with access to individual Bank portals. Before access to bank portals were necessary for all sorts of manual payments and exceptions if we really implement the 100% of functions and dont leave exceptions that risk mitigation can be achieved and efficiency at automated payment runs.

• At a large corporation with more than 60 entities and 400+ bank accounts, the savings and improvements are massive considering how time-consuming the manual work would be. I don't have any numbers to quote, unfortunately.
• We are now massively expanding our TIS with the full integration of automated payment runs. This has larger operational impacts, like the possible consolidation of banking and dedicated payment teams.

Incentivized