Trellix Endpoint Security ENS vs. Watchguard Endpoint Security

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Watchguard Endpoint Security

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Trellix Endpoint Security ENS	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient.	N/A
Watchguard Endpoint Security	Score 8.8 out of 10	N/A	WatchGuard EPDR (formerly Panda Adaptive Defense 360) combines next-generation antivirus protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), patch management, content filtering, email security, full disk encryption, and more, into one package. The platform touts a unique zero-trust security service that certifies the legitimacy and safety of all running applications thanks to a combination of automated, AI-driven processes and investigation services provided by a team of malware analysts.	N/A

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Watchguard Endpoint Security

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Trellix Endpoint Security ENS	Watchguard Endpoint Security
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Start Demo

Community Pulse
	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS	Watchguard Endpoint Security
Considered Both Products	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS At the time we took the decision all other products seemed to be complicated in usage and licensing. Trellix was very simple in all the aspects: licensing, usage, support. It also was very simple to deploy, setup and manage. Product interface was simple to understand and even … Incentivized Helpful? JC Jensen Concepcion IT head Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS All in one protection for endpoint devices, the data loss prevention, and adaptive threat protection is the best advantage against other competitors. The cost for the platform and service is very effective and efficient. The usage and capability of this software is very edge … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Unlike Trellix Endpoint Security Symantec Endpoint provides less information about events on the user side. Trellix give an opportunity to see information about virus detection on a user machine as quick as it possible, so we were able to catch the signs of virus propagation … Incentivized Helpful? Junior Pierre-Toussaint Senior Information Technology Security Officer Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS i've evaluated a few different solution but from different needs Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS FireEye Endpoint Security is my favorite EDR tool. It's a single pane of glass that fits nicely into the Helix and NX platforms. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS It has fewer false positive issues. It also provides more compatibility with a variety of different OS versions. The sensor installation is easy to use, update and maintain as well as the reporting capabilities that it can offer are more robust than the ones that other … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Compared to its competitors like Cisco, McAfee is cheaper. At the competitive pricing levels, McAfee Endpoint Security does a good job. Although it stacks up finely against decent priced solutions but it doesn't provide superior service if the price limit is scaled down or up. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Compared to Endgame and AMP, McAfee Endpoint Security doesn't hold a candle to them when it comes to detecting/advanced identifying malware or zero days. Since Mcafee Endpoint Security is signature-based, it is way behind the curve with newer anti-malware tools that can focus … Incentivized Helpful? TP Tanish Pruthi Marketing Associate Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS We were using Microsoft Defender in the beginning as it was free and quite good. But as we got acquired by a large MNC, we were asked to switch to McAfee as we had to follow the company guidelines which takes data security very seriously and personally. I think the switch did … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS The solution is already in place when I join the organization. I do not have any information on what other antivirus software they evaluated before decided to purchase McAfee Endpoint Security. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee is a strong, if not strongest A/V solution in the endpoint security space. It's wide adoption and strong support and positive reviews from companies like Gartner and Forrester back it up. Incentivized Helpful? Ralf Richter Senior Solution Architect Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS If you have Cisco tools and equipment globally in place and just for the clients additionally McAfee you should have a deeper look. We wanted to install end-2-end security over all networks and hardware. This was a big point for Cisco. For a managed client team, Cisco is a step … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee Endpoint Security has a better GUI, better pricing, stronger features, and agent deployment is much faster. Their firewall is extremely good, and for those reasons I would firmly recommend it over other solutions (Kaspersky, Symantec etc). Like I mentioned earlier, do … Incentivized Helpful? Dharma raju DevOps Engineer/Linux Admin Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee Endpoint Security provides a single platform for Firewall, AV and web control. With the new console and integration between the components, threat detection is superior. Incentivized Helpful? Tom Parker Remote Facilities Systems Support Analyst Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Trend Micro is a better solution in our environment. It is easier to manage and seems to do a better job. Incentivized Helpful? Christopher "Scott" Pandolfo Security Specialist Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee is a cheaper price point, however Kaspersky out performs McAfee in every category. We went with McAfee, because many of the team members in IT were familar with it, less training (short term), and lower cost (short term) Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Advanced Threat Protection, or ATP in Office 365 was awful. Some attachments wouldn't be delivered at all while others took minutes and sometimes hours to be delivered after being scanned. It was causing us to lose business. FireEye processes attachments in less than 60 seconds … Incentivized Helpful? Roberta Jones IT Administrative Specialist Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS We only selected McAfee because we are already using ESET NOD32 for the protection of our desktops and laptops. We didn't want to use the same software for our servers so we chose McAfee instead. I personally like ESET Smart Security better than McAfee when deploying it on a … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Trellix Endpoint Security ENS interfaces better with other tools and is simpler to use. provides wider endpoint protection and more centralized control than SentinelOne's automatic response. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS preserves McAfee's dependability while offering newer … Incentivized Helpful?	Watchguard Endpoint Security Verified User Anonymous Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Better service, especially for distributors. Mejor servicio, sobre todo a los distribuidores. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security WatchGuard Endpoint Security has native XDR, has 4 security pillars on a single platform, has the ability to correlate information from solutions together, and offers greater protection to critical environments. WatchGuard Endpoint Security possui um XDR nativo, possui 4 pilares … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security They know more solutions than Watchguard Endpoint Security Conocen más otras soluciones que Watchguard Endpoint Security Incentivized Helpful? Joshua Jackson Information Technology and Systems Manager Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Watchguard EDPR is on par with the others. They essentially all do the same thing, but Watchguard has great visibility. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Watchguard is by far a tool that all organizations should be able to count on, I have had experiences with other protection tools, and none of them has responded effectively to the challenges posed by the increasingly lethal attacks of malicious people, who only intend to … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Adaptive Defense 360 / WatchGuard EPDR is much better and efficient. Webroot is not an EDR but just an AV platform at the time we were using it. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Despite offering great value for money, comparing Sophos' offering to WatchGuard Endpoint Security we find Sophos' offering is far superiour due to it's support system, the distributors it uses (apart from Arrow), it's management console, the resource-light application and, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Considering its effectiveness in protecting our network and much more, it has a fair price, its features are effective providing secure protection of your network and best of all, it gives you peace of mind so that you can focus on other issues in the company Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Comparing the two products, WatchGuard Endpoint Security is more complete, it has a centralized console, it uses better threat detection techniques and has the ability to Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security We use WatchGuard Endpoint Security in Combination with MDR from WatchGuard for a specific type of our customers like we do for Palo Alto Cortex XDR and MDR from Sophos. Incentivized Helpful? BL Bruno Laureti CEO Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Watchguard offers a security ecosystem that protects against all threats Incentivized Helpful? HB Habib Barakat Director Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Better support, better pricing, better integration, better academy, better tools to educate internal staff. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Kaspersky Endpoint Security Incentivized Helpful? Timothy Clarkson Managing Director Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security ThreatLocker and Huntress Incentivized Helpful? NB Nick Butler General Manager Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security It provides a singe product that replaces multiple products Incentivized Helpful? Steve Neuss Director of Sales Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security With advancements in AI-powered cyber threats, PCA needed an endpoint security solution with advanced threat hunting and zero-trust capabilities, built for an XDR platform, and integrated into a single management console with real-time communication. The solution needed to … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security I've done demos of several other similar products but not really used any competitive products since I've been with this line since 2000 and never felt like I needed to switch to something else. Incentivized Helpful? MS Michael Shew IT Lead Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Watchguard is simply easier to implement than even Defender. The cost to value ratio is high as Watchguard subscription is cheaper than many other options. Incentivized Helpful? RS Roberto Saldaña Scholar ISO27001 Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security by the moment, only the EDR Incentivized Helpful? PR Pierce Rehn Network Engineer Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Watchguard AD integrates and works well with every security solution we use and sell to our customers. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security No other products Incentivized Helpful? Rob Lezer Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Only to use on Apple in the past Incentivized Helpful? Ryan Snelson Managing Director Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security Very similar. I feel like Watchguard need to get a better foothold with people trusting the name in the endpoint space. It has pretty much everything S 1 does but it also provides so much more. Simple things like patch management and encryption are fantastic adding that deliver … Incentivized Helpful? Martin Szudarski Systems Engineer Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security WatchGuard Endpoint Security products have more features and provide better protection. Incentivized Helpful? IE Ian Edwards Technical Consultant Chose Watchguard Endpoint Security SentinelOne, ESET, Webroot Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Watchguard Endpoint Security

Endpoint Security

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS 8.8 Ratings 3% above category average	Watchguard Endpoint Security 8.3 Ratings 3% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology	9.30 Ratings	8.30 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	8.80 Ratings	8.60 Ratings
Centralized Management	9.40 Ratings	7.50 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	7.90 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Infection Remediation	8.90 Ratings	9.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	8.20 Ratings	7.70 Ratings
Malware Detection	9.40 Ratings	8.60 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS	Watchguard Endpoint Security
Small Businesses	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score 9.1 out of 10	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS	Watchguard Endpoint Security
Likelihood to Recommend	9.3 (0 ratings)	8.3 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	8.1 (0 ratings)
Availability	- (0 ratings)	8.7 (0 ratings)
Performance	- (0 ratings)	8.5 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	5.0 (0 ratings)	8.3 (0 ratings)
In-Person Training	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Online Training	- (0 ratings)	7.6 (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	7.6 (0 ratings)
Configurability	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	10.0 (0 ratings)	8.7 (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	- (0 ratings)	8.7 (0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	- (0 ratings)	8.7 (0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	- (0 ratings)	8.6 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS	Watchguard Endpoint Security
Likelihood to Recommend	During the pandemic all our users worked remotely that was challenging from security perspective, so we had to deploy the endpoint protection system with cloud based monitoring server. By doing that we were able to keep safety for users workspaces even though some of them did not connect to VPN for a long time Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	We offer Watchguard Endpoint Security as a low cost alternative to Sophos Endpoint. As such, I would recommend this product to anyone with a customer with that same sort of mindset. It would also be appropriate for customers with a more 'basic' environment as configuring profiles is far less in depth compared to Sophos. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Provides high fidelity alerting. Allows CSOC analysts to perform forensic triage and alert investigations through containment from a single pane of glass. Provides alert telemetry across on-disk and in-memory attacks. Supports many additional 'bolt-on' modules to provide additional alert context or capabilities. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	It does an excellent job of detecting and preventing threats It uses global intelligence to reduce the time and effort I need to spend performing security operations It is lightweight and easy to deploy to client computers using a single agent for all modules Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	My biggest flak with McAfee Endpoint Security is that it is quite resource-intensive. It does tend to make the system a little slow. You get security at the expense of your machine's speed. Even though the drive encryption makes the system more secure, it takes a lot of time to first enter the very long password, and then for it to decrypt the whole machine. This sometimes clashes with Windows update and causes a lot of complications which leads to boot loops. Incentivized TP Tanish Pruthi Marketing Associate Read full review	As with any application of this nature, it can block processes or other suspected security risks that are actually safe. While easy to use, it sometimes provides less learning opportunities for less experienced staff who are not as well-versed in these applications. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	No answers on this topic	I will definitely renew the software licenses on all our clients when they expire.Again, I have never worked so well with antivirus software before today. Watchguard is an extremely adaptable software to our business needs and I don't think I want to try other solutions that the market offers Incentivized CS Corrado Santucci Senior Information Technology Audit Manager Read full review
Usability	So below is my breakdown, Pro's: Centralized Management, Comprehensive Protection and customization. Con's: Initial cost Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Easy and intuitive MSP management portal to manage all of your clients from a single pane of glass. Policies can be pushed down globally or individually based on needs. The client portal allows access to their tenant information and installs only which is nice if you are working with clients who might have an internal person or an IT team that also wants access to things to manage themself. Incentivized BP Brian Powell CTO (Chief Technical Officer) Read full review
Reliability and Availability	No answers on this topic	The software is 100% managed on a cloud platform that can be managed via an account even if they are not present within the company network where the software is installed, I even always opened the control panel on the browser of my smartphone to monitor the situation.I have never experienced any abnormal software crashes Incentivized CS Corrado Santucci Senior Information Technology Audit Manager Read full review
Performance	No answers on this topic	The only annoyance I complain, if we want to be picky, is the fact of the constant disconnections from the control panel.Every about 4 hours the account logs out even if I set the "remember this device" flag; having said that I have not noticed neither slowdowns nor conflicts with other software Incentivized CS Corrado Santucci Senior Information Technology Audit Manager Read full review
Support Rating	The support is pretty good, and I haven't had any issues with getting the highest quality technical support when there are issues. Tech support representatives that I have dealt with know the product quite well and have solved many issues that I have had with the product in the past. The only issue I have with support is that it can be quite expensive. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	I gave it a 10 because I compare it to air conditioning. I need it to work every day, 24/7. I need it to be reliable and not something that requires a ton of interaction from staff to make sure it works every day. In addition, I should be able to run other things at my house when the AC is on. Panda fits that description. Mike Narumiya President, Principal Read full review
In-Person Training	No answers on this topic	Trainer was excellent, knew this product in-depth. Incentivized Krzysztof Wisniewski Senior Systems Engineer Read full review
Online Training	No answers on this topic	The training was very helpful. It demonstrated how to configure the service for initial install, items to monitor, and how to set up for ongoing protection. Hands on training is more helpful but this is a good starting point Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Implementation Rating	No answers on this topic	Implementation shouldn't present any problems in standard office environments. In environments with development teams, however, caution is needed. If zero trust is enabled, mechanisms must be in place to ensure that internal software isn't classified as a false positive (software certificate, exception folder, etc.) Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	We only selected McAfee because we are already using ESET NOD32 for the protection of our desktops and laptops. We didn't want to use the same software for our servers so we chose McAfee instead. I personally like ESET Smart Security better than McAfee when deploying it on a desktop or laptop because I think it protects the PC better. When it comes to web protection, policy updates, etc., McAfee is the better choice and that's why we deployed it on our servers. Incentivized Roberta Jones IT Administrative Specialist Read full review	Way back in the day, I have used Norton end point security and really did not like the speed at which it tried to do its job. I know I am dating myself here. WatchGuard Endpoint Security, I feel, is light years ahead of Norton's product. WatchGuard Endpoint Security is FAST, ACCURATE, and truly an enterprise product. Incentivized JP James Parker I.T. Admin. Read full review
Scalability	No answers on this topic	With the implementation of watchguard (at the beginning Panda Endpoint, but it is the same) I was able to insert in the control panel all the unauthorized software previously installed by colleagues without any authorization from the various department heads.Now any licensed software goes into lockdown and can be unlocked from the control panel Incentivized CS Corrado Santucci Senior Information Technology Audit Manager Read full review
Return on Investment	This tool helped us in delegating the asset safety responsibility to the client level by 80%, leaving 20% for the management console. With a decent pricing, the benefits are slightly above expectations. The ROI is good. But, considering most of the malware comes from internet, with a good email security appliance and next gen firewall in place, the online security alerts are now redundant. It could be something that can be termed as overkill on the budget. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	By committing to go all in on Watchguard Advanced EPDR across our whole client base, we maximized our price position - enabling us to offer the best endpoint security at a price better than what lesser competitive products cost. Leveraging Watchguard Endpoint Security as part of our unified platform strategy provides better integrated security, managed through Watchguard's cloud architecture. This significantly reduces our cost to deploy, manage, and support our client's. Our improved security offering, better delivery, and stronger price position has helped us achieve 56% growth in our managed services business over the past 18-months. Organizations that have disparate cyber security products often require specialists for each solution in their stack. Watchguard provides outstanding training resources that equip our entire technical staff - significantly improving our service delivery while lowering our overall cost of business. Incentivized Steve Neuss Director of Sales Read full review
ScreenShots	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Screenshots	Watchguard Endpoint Security Screenshots