Trellix Endpoint Security ENS vs. WithSecure Business Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient.N/A
WithSecure Business Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The WithSecure Business Suite (formerly F-Secure Business Suite) is an endpoint protection and Internet content filtering suite deployed on-premises for enterprises, from the WithScure Corporation headquartered in Helsinki.N/A
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security ENSWithSecure Business Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Trellix Endpoint Security ENSWithSecure Business Suite
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Trellix Endpoint Security ENSWithSecure Business Suite
Features
Trellix Endpoint Security ENSWithSecure Business Suite
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
8.8
Ratings
3% above category average
WithSecure Business Suite
8.0
Ratings
7% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology9.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)8.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Centralized Management9.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support7.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Infection Remediation8.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management8.20 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Malware Detection9.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
User Ratings
Trellix Endpoint Security ENSWithSecure Business Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Trellix Endpoint Security ENSWithSecure Business Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
During the pandemic all our users worked remotely that was challenging from security perspective, so we had to deploy the endpoint protection system with cloud based monitoring server. By doing that we were able to keep safety for users workspaces even though some of them did not connect to VPN for a long time
Read full review
  • Very stable and cost-effective.
  • Better integration with leading database vendors would be great; this would address features that are missing like x-windows support and concurrent secure file transfers.
  • Patching is relatively fast and not as frequent as other vendors (with no impact on adherence to security best practices).
  • Very easy to install and low storage footprint.
Read full review
Pros
  • Provides high fidelity alerting.
  • Allows CSOC analysts to perform forensic triage and alert investigations through containment from a single pane of glass.
  • Provides alert telemetry across on-disk and in-memory attacks.
  • Supports many additional 'bolt-on' modules to provide additional alert context or capabilities.
Read full review
  • Most up to date secure/encryption technology.
  • Very fast to set up and maintain.
  • Supported by all major hardware platforms (Microsoft, Linux).
Read full review
Cons
  • My biggest flak with McAfee Endpoint Security is that it is quite resource-intensive. It does tend to make the system a little slow. You get security at the expense of your machine's speed.
  • Even though the drive encryption makes the system more secure, it takes a lot of time to first enter the very long password, and then for it to decrypt the whole machine. This sometimes clashes with Windows update and causes a lot of complications which leads to boot loops.
Read full review
  • X-windows support could be more robust.
  • Virtual shell adaptation could be improved.
  • Greater concurrency for large secure transmissions would be a great add-on.
Read full review
Usability
So below is my breakdown, Pro's: Centralized Management, Comprehensive Protection and customization. Con's: Initial cost
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The support is pretty good, and I haven't had any issues with getting the highest quality technical support when there are issues. Tech support representatives that I have dealt with know the product quite well and have solved many issues that I have had with the product in the past. The only issue I have with support is that it can be quite expensive.
Read full review
  • Support organization is active, so is online community boards.
  • There have been no significant issues that haven't been able to be quickly addressed by either online documentation or F-Secure support.
  • Easy to use diagnostic tools and information gathering, make problem analysis fast.
  • Phone support can be different due to time zone differences, but this has not been a major issue.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We only selected McAfee because we are already using ESET NOD32 for the protection of our desktops and laptops. We didn't want to use the same software for our servers so we chose McAfee instead. I personally like ESET Smart Security better than McAfee when deploying it on a desktop or laptop because I think it protects the PC better. When it comes to web protection, policy updates, etc., McAfee is the better choice and that's why we deployed it on our servers.
Read full review
  • This suite of software does not have any mentionable competition, in my opinion.
  • It adheres to current security protocols, in-frequent patching requirements, low IT overhead, and on-going support are exemplary.
  • Robust documentation and online community boards help keep support and maintenance transparent and efficient.
  • Legacy support for older OS' is quite useful.
  • Simplicity when onboarding into custom hybrid network configurations is also vital.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • This tool helped us in delegating the asset safety responsibility to the client level by 80%, leaving 20% for the management console.
  • With a decent pricing, the benefits are slightly above expectations. The ROI is good.
  • But, considering most of the malware comes from internet, with a good email security appliance and next gen firewall in place, the online security alerts are now redundant. It could be something that can be termed as overkill on the budget.
Read full review
  • Very low cost.
  • Low IT overhead (very low network bandwidth, CPU, storage utilization).
  • Supported by all major hardware vendors.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Screenshots

Screenshot of The Monitoring workspace presents actionable endpoint threat detection without the noise.Screenshot of Automatically identify the key findings without requiring manual evaluation of each individual artifact.Screenshot of Visualization displays relationships and speeds analyst understanding.Screenshot of AI-guided investigations automatically provide answers to typical questions asked during a security incident and highlight the most relevant evidence.