Tricentis NeoLoad

Tricentis NeoLoad

44 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Tricentis NeoLoad	Score9.3 out of 10	N/A	Tricentis NeoLoad is a solution for continuous performance testing software to automate API and application load testing. It was developed by the French company Neotys and acquired by Tricentis, along with the company, in March 2021.	$20,000 per year with 300 virtual users

Pricing

Tricentis NeoLoad

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Tricentis NeoLoad
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Optional

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Tricentis NeoLoad
Considered Both Products	Tricentis Jignesh Patel Software Engineer - Tech Lead in Information Technology at UPMC (Hospital & Health Care, 10,001+ employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad Because of noted as below points we leaning towards Tricentis NeoLoad over other tools: Easy to use, faster test design, script customization, real time test monitoring, IP spoofing, mobile testing, scalability, easy to setup and maintain, record and playback capability, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis NeoLoad K6 and Jmeter. Tricentis NeoLoad is doing good but k6 is catching up with open telemetry integration. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis NeoLoad in upper middle field Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis NeoLoad Tricentis NeoLoad is easier to use, with simpler steps to follow to record/write test scripts and to design scenarios. It is scalable and comparatively provides overall benefits in a fair cost. Neoload also provides APIs for anyone to leverage and build on top of the existing … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis NeoLoad It outperformed all of the above mentioned tools in many aspects Incentivized Helpful? Hari Pal Program Project Manager in Information Technology at Boxinall Softech (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad What I find tough about LambdaTest is that it might be intimidating when you first start out. While advantageous, the abundance of features and options may take some time to comprehend completely. On the other hand, Tricentis Neoload, with its streamlined performance testing … Incentivized Helpful? Zishan Ali Data Scientist in Information Technology at TechCASA (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad When we used Apache JMeter we faced some problems like less documentation is available for integrating tools, and some integrations have not yet been deployed. Very few plugin updates are made. Since customer support is an open source tool, it is a major problem. While … Incentivized Helpful? Sandeep Kamboj Software Engineer in Engineering at Tech Casa LLP (Computer Software, 11-50 employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad We discovered that recording and playing back the performance scripts was easier than with JMeter.The application features an easy-to-use interface that allows us to record and run the script locally before attempting to run it through the Tricentis NeoLoad Web site.In order to … Incentivized Helpful? Mukul Singh DevOps Engineer in Information Technology at Boxinall Softech (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad When I used Apache JMeter in our organization, I faced a problem with its user interface, which was quite hard to understand. New and beautiful UI/UX designs can greatly improve the usability of the user interface. So we decided to switch to Tricentis Neoload, and we are happy … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis NeoLoad Better value for the usage level. Incentivized Helpful? Rohan Kumar Software Engineer in Information Technology at Mytechcasa (Information Technology & Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad There is a learning curve for those who are new to cross-browser testing or the Lambda Test platform to comprehend the features, capabilities, and how to put up tests successfully. There can be resource restrictions, such how many parallel tests you can perform at once, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis NeoLoad One major difference between the two tools is that Apache JMeter is an open-source tool, while Tricentis NeoLoad is a commercial product. Although Apache JMeter is free to use and Tricentis NeoLoad requires a license to use, Tricentis NeoLoad is more feature-rich and … Incentivized Helpful? Vandana Yadav Presales Executive in Information Technology at Corporate Infotech Pvt Ltd (Information Technology & Services, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad Tricentis NeoLoad stacks up against them as it is generally used where there are many websites or applications with large number of users. It is less expensive and provides some additional functionlities than the other tools available in the market. It ensures if any website … Incentivized Helpful? Wolfgang Gaida Senior Test Engineer in Quality Assurance at twinformatics GmbH (Insurance, 201-500 employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad We used Jenkins for manual performance testing and had big efforts to script and evaluate the test results. Furthermore, the effort of maintaining and editing the scripts was very high. To generate a report, many tables must be analyzed. The efforts of these tasks are minimized … Incentivized Helpful? Fahad Ali System Coordinator & Development Officer in Product Management at Alkaram Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd (Textiles, 10,001+ employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad Its tools are very compatible with both Windows,Linus & can be reuse & share our test-suite & results to certain analytics. Neoload has good support of many protocols. like enterprise software SAP Oracle Siebel etc as compared to Apache JMeter. Moreover; for value-added & with … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis NeoLoad NeoLoad is more SAP-centric and offers use cases a lot closer to what we experiment on a daily basis. The main competition in the space would be loadrunner but it lacks the flexibility of NeoLoad, and also comes at a much higher price in a way that would have hurt our … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis NeoLoad Building automated/stress tests by hand is tedious and neoLoad makes it much easier. Incentivized Helpful? Craig Solinski Systems Administrator/Programmer in Information Technology at Indiana University (Higher Education, 10,001+ employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad NeoLoad's ability to provide accurate visual test results in GUI saves developer time. NeoLoad's focus on Load Testing saves developer time when compared to combing thru details of 3 or 4 other products we evaluated. NeoLoad's ability to view live testing metrics/results … Incentivized Helpful? Dirk Schweier Test Automation and Performance Test Engineer in Quality Assurance at G. Muth Partners GmbH (Computer Software, 11-50 employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad In small projects open source tools like JMeter are the hardest competitors because money is a reliable metric. But NeoLoad offers a value in case of reporting and scalability. The standard reports are very comprehensive and easy to understand for stakeholders. It takes much … Incentivized Helpful? Michael Esposito Software Performance Architect in Information Technology at Genworth (Insurance, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad NeolLoad is a less expensive alternative to HP LoadRunner that is also easier to learn and use. NeoLoad supports the same web-based protocols as HP LoadRunner, and, in addition, provides better support for testing mobile applications. In my organization, NeoLoad's main … Incentivized Helpful? Arpita Choudhury sytems engineer in Quality Assurance at Tata Consultancy Services (Information Technology and Services, 10,001+ employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad NeoLoad does not require much scripting knowledge and can be easily grasped. It is more cost effective with all the required features. As mobile applications are booming, it has an advantage over other tools to flourish in mobile testing. Incentivized Helpful? Saifur Rahman QA Analyst in Information Technology at DrFirst, Inc. (Government Relations, 501-1000 employees) Chose Tricentis NeoLoad As I have always mentioned, you do not need to be super technical in order to get your job done. You do not need to write your script. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis NeoLoad Not use but for my customer, integration with tosca and qtest Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	Tricentis NeoLoad
Likelihood to Recommend	7.7 (24 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	7.3 (1 ratings)
Usability	7.3 (3 ratings)
Support Rating	3.6 (3 ratings)
Implementation Rating	6.4 (1 ratings)