Trimble Fleet Mobility vs. Trimble MAPS PC*Miler

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Trimble Fleet Mobility
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
PC*Miler
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
ALK Technologies, acquired by Trimble, developed PC*Miler, a transportation management and route planning application for trucking entities needing geomapping and GIS information. The product is now offered under the Trimble MAPS brand.
$995
one-time fee per user
Pricing
Trimble Fleet MobilityTrimble MAPS PC*Miler
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
PC*Miler
$995
one-time fee per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Trimble Fleet MobilityPC*Miler
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Trimble Fleet MobilityTrimble MAPS PC*Miler
User Ratings
Trimble Fleet MobilityTrimble MAPS PC*Miler
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Trimble Fleet MobilityTrimble MAPS PC*Miler
Likelihood to Recommend
It is VERY adept at creating solutions for single or multiple point collection or distribution scenarios. We have multiple customers with large, central DCs that utilize Appian for their regular route rationalization processes. We have had less success when analyzing "touring" fleets where only historical data was available. Without the flexibility to change/select new combinations, the solution quality is diminished.
Read full review
IT is easy to find best route for my drivers when they ask. The accuracy of miles and routes for trucks is very good.
Read full review
Pros
  • Appian is excellent for use in both the analysis arena and ongoing operations support. The speed to solution and quality of solution is at the top of the market.
  • The configurability of the system gives the user the flexibility to address almost any route problem imaginable. Analysts have the ability to recreate the "world" to fit their customer's needs rather than forcing the customer into a predetermined framework.
  • The installation of the software is flexible and can be structured to fit any work group's format, from a centralized core to a distributed mobile analysis team.
Read full review
  • Route Visibility
  • Alternate routes
  • Mileage accuracy for rates
Read full review
Cons
  • Transit times are sometimes inaccurate/inconsistent.
  • Software can slow down as a route file undergoes many changes.
  • Large quantity of input files can sometimes create confusion/inconsistency when route files are shared by multiple users.
Read full review
  • Weight restriction roads
  • Easier use of homescreen to get miles and rates
  • Make it more container transport friendly
  • It would be best to have an easier way to share route information with drivers with one click of the mouse.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Appian products have become an instrumental tool within the company, from a daily tactical standpoint building route plans, to a strategic standpoint in assisting with project analysis. Since the tool is able to interface with many different on-board computer vendors, it is something that could be used by the company long term.
Read full review
It is a good system and allows my team ease of use and familiarity
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We used to use TruckStops until we switched to Appian Direct Route. I was very happy with TruckStops mainly because it was a simple system that got the job done. There were no integration issues, no errors left and right, no hassle. Appian on the other hand, while it is a nice system, it needs a lot of work. During optimization, mileage is critical and I am afraid Appian fails in this aspect with the lack of proper integration with PC Miler which is industry standard.
Read full review
Much better for trucking use and routing. Mileage is much more accurate. Its easy to use and search for alternate truck routes if needed.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Decreased employee efficiency because of numerous errors and constant troubleshooting
  • Successfully optimized routes
Read full review
  • Time saver for dispatchers
  • Time saver for rate requests
  • Ease of use for routing and verifying routes.
Read full review
ScreenShots