Tungsten Capture vs. Veryfi

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Tungsten Capture
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Tungsten Capture (formerly Kofax Capture) is a suite of multichannel document capture applications.
$3,500
per year
Veryfi
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Veryfi, headquartered in San Mateo, uses its Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based OCR API to provide Intelligent Document Processing and data extraction for a variety of purposes. Veryfi AI is pre-trained to extract and transform unstructured data from receipts, invoices, purchase orders, checks, W2s and other business documents into structured data, without a human in the loop. A solution for enterprises and technology companies alike, Veryfi’s AI-based platform boasts users among hundreds of…
$5
per month per user
Pricing
Tungsten CaptureVeryfi
Editions & Modules
Kofax Capture
$3,500
per year
Time - Tracking
$5
per month per user
Money - Expense Management
$13.75
per month per user
OCR API - Starter
$500
per month $0.16 per Invoice and $0.08 per Receipt
OCR API - Enterprise
Custom Quote
volume discounts
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Tungsten CaptureVeryfi
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Tungsten CaptureVeryfi
Considered Both Products
Tungsten Capture
Chose Tungsten Capture
Quality of data capture.
Automatic data integration with Oracle and SAP ERP.
Automatic image integration with Oracle and SAP ERP.
Chose Tungsten Capture
Kofax Capture was less expensive than the IBM product and was easier to use than both IBM and Amazon in my opinion. The unlimited scripting of Kofax Capture allowed us to fully integrate the tool into our business processes to improve our automation and reduce errors. We …
Chose Tungsten Capture
Kofax Capture is a very extensible platform that is a swiss army knife for data extraction. The other platforms handle standard forms and tables well but does not allow for the customizations needed for more complex documents that Kofax Capture is able to do with ease.
Chose Tungsten Capture
Kofax was a better solution for higher volumes of work, and automatic index data entry. It also provided OCR and Barcode reading.
Chose Tungsten Capture
Kofax is quicker when searching mass amounts of documents and data. Any filters would bring up immediate information, whereas in Access the database is slower.
Veryfi

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
Tungsten CaptureVeryfi
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
Adobe Acrobat
Adobe Acrobat
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Tungsten CaptureVeryfi
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Tungsten CaptureVeryfi
Likelihood to Recommend
If there is a desire to extract text from emails, documents, spreadsheets, and faxes this is the perfect platform for that. The only thing it does, extracting information, it does well. External information in terms of flat files, databases, and web services can be tied into the platform as well to allow line item matching, address validation, and other features that make it just an overall great ingestion system.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • One of the things we relied on Kofax was its connector with Oracle UCM and Filenet. It was easy to configure batch classes and set up release scripts to UCM or Filent
  • One other aspect of it was validation scripts based on external Oracle databases. It was very helpful.
  • After removal of dongle, it became easier to maintain the software.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Kofax Capture's interface is antiquated and could use a refresh. An attempt was made two versions back to add ribbons and modernize the interface but anything below the first level looks and feels like a tired application.
  • Bugs that have existed in the platform for years are still prevalent and there is no priority to fix them. Features and critical bugs are regularly fixed but simple nagging ones that can cause a development project to close and lose all work is commonplace.
  • Licensing, while reasonable for lower volume solutions, becomes expensive once a project reaches a certain threshold. Ensure future planning capacity is done before purchasing to make sure it's a cost effective solution.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It's good.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Haven't really used their support yet
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Kofax Capture was less expensive than the IBM product and was easier to use than both IBM and Amazon in my opinion. The unlimited scripting of Kofax Capture allowed us to fully integrate the tool into our business processes to improve our automation and reduce errors. We also looked at a product from Nuance but at the time decided to eliminate it from our evaluation.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots