Tungsten Capture vs. Web Manuals

If there is a desire to extract text from emails, documents, spreadsheets, and faxes this is the perfect platform for that. The only thing it does, extracting information, it does well. External information in terms of flat files, databases, and web services can be tied into the platform as well to allow line item matching, address validation, and other features that make it just an overall great ingestion system.

Incentivized

Formating, linking, compliance, and customized distribution. It is easy to navigate and review changes. Hospitality Management, Airlines crews, individual management systems, etc. Standardization of documents; compliance checklists easily available. If you are limited on office/ management staff and/or do not have a single base for your flight crews, Web Manuals would be the tool for you.

Incentivized

• One of the things we relied on Kofax was its connector with Oracle UCM and Filenet. It was easy to configure batch classes and set up release scripts to UCM or Filent
• One other aspect of it was validation scripts based on external Oracle databases. It was very helpful.
• After removal of dongle, it became easier to maintain the software.

Incentivized

• Employee attendance tracking for small unit departments
• Work place instruction
• Having controlled documents with links between other such docs

Incentivized

• Kofax Capture's interface is antiquated and could use a refresh. An attempt was made two versions back to add ribbons and modernize the interface but anything below the first level looks and feels like a tired application.
• Bugs that have existed in the platform for years are still prevalent and there is no priority to fix them. Features and critical bugs are regularly fixed but simple nagging ones that can cause a development project to close and lose all work is commonplace.
• Licensing, while reasonable for lower volume solutions, becomes expensive once a project reaches a certain threshold. Ensure future planning capacity is done before purchasing to make sure it's a cost effective solution.

Incentivized

• Certain automated modules require validation by the user when they update themselves, it would be better if this is automated.
• Publishing a manual as PDF can take several minutes to process, this processing time could be improved.
• Possible compatibility issues with new IOS versions

Incentivized

Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.

Incentivized

It's good.

Incentivized

Haven't really used their support yet

Incentivized

Kofax Capture was less expensive than the IBM product and was easier to use than both IBM and Amazon in my opinion. The unlimited scripting of Kofax Capture allowed us to fully integrate the tool into our business processes to improve our automation and reduce errors. We also looked at a product from Nuance but at the time decided to eliminate it from our evaluation.

Incentivized

• We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.

Incentivized

• Saved Time and save cost of using different software to manage individual tasks
• Documents links are easy to access, no KT sessions every time and productivity increased
• No particular hiring is required, easy to use and implement

Incentivized