Lever vs. TurboHire

Managing pipeline and candidate communication is easy through lever. Keeping it all in one place allows the hiring teams to be in the loop real-time. The reporting is clunky and basic, however, and without a 3rd party tool, sourcing from the lever database is difficult. Also, it is very easy to have duplicate candidates since the alerts Lever gives are often incorrect

Incentivized

A great alternative in the market to use for recruitment. It is really very helpful for the leadership team to track and find the right resources. It can be integrated with another page also. Provides flexible connectivity. Includes simple process. So good at keeping candidate details in the database, their experience also.

Incentivized

• Great integration: Keeps a list of Outlook email communication along with LinkedIn and other data sources
• Is fairly lively, not too much lag between screens even though it is looking through a lot of data.
• Has excellent reporting on how well each email message is working.

Incentivized

• User friendly User Interface
• Cost effective
• making pipeline of candidates in a great way.

Incentivized

• It would be nice if we were provided a more detailed summary of why our referrals were not selected for a position.
• The feedback feature that interviewers can give on candidates is great, but it is sometimes hard to find again after completion.
• If there is a mobile version, better marketing/awareness on this would be helpful.

Incentivized

• While adding a resume in the ATS, very often the resume is not read and had to re do it. It sometimes ask to put the resume in a particular format which is annoying.
• Turbohire is missing one major feature of detailed reports of the candidates. The weekly and monthly reports really helps in keeping a track on the pipeline and performance, which should be added.
• Sometimes it won't show a candidate while searching from emailid or mobile number, which creates duplicity.

Incentivized

It isn't difficult to use for the applicant processing, but [I feel] if you want to pull reports or use their tools, good luck!

What support? - Add a ticket and get links to [I believe] their unhelpful user guide. Add a charge if you want better support - afterward just got those links faster...

I think Lever stacks up fairly well and is right above the midpoint. iCIMS and Greenhouse provide a larger, more Enterprise style product for huge scale, so I'd put the two of them above Lever at this time, but we chose Lever over Greenhouse for a reason. I just don't know if we'd be able to scale to the size we'd want to long-term with their product suite. Compared to the others listed here, and many others, I would take Lever every time.

Incentivized

The major decisive factors for us when we were looking for an ATS were cost and easy to use ATS as we were in the transition phase. Turbohire was cheaper and had easy user interface and didn't require any additional trainings on using ATS. The demo given by Turbohire was enough to understand its functions.

Incentivized

• We have an ATS now and did not have one before
• LinkedIn integration is better than others I've seen
• Spend too much time researching unhelpful user guides since their support is terrible
• Lots of frustration with post implementation support
• Integrations break, tools don't work and settings fail which could lead to other issues

• Turbohire is relatively cheaper comparing to other few similar software available in the market.
• It's cost effective ATS to start with and to get shifted to an ATS from traditional methods of Excel or sheets.
• Pretty simple to use, so the transition is really smooth and hassle free.
• Overall Turbohire is having positive impact on ROI, advisable for small and medium sized companies.

Incentivized