Unity vs. Verenia CPQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Unity
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Unity Technologies headquartered in San Francisco offers the Unity real-time 3D and 2D development platform.
$200
per person/per month
Verenia CPQ
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
EosCPQ is a cloud-based configuration, pricing, and quoting software solution offered by Verenia. EosCPQ includes features such as a powerful rules engine, dynamic product visualization options, and web lead generation with product configuration / quote forms.N/A
Pricing
UnityVerenia CPQ
Editions & Modules
Enterprise
$200
per person/per month
Plus
$399
per person/per year
Pro
1,800
per person/per year
Personal
Free
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
UnityVerenia CPQ
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
UnityVerenia CPQ
Considered Both Products
Unity
Chose Unity
We love utilizing unreal engines but we seem to have a better use case for the architectural visualization side of things. This has given us the ability to find better more photo-realistic assets from not only the marketplace but 3rd party sites that have a unity bases file to …
Chose Unity
I think Unreal is for those who want to develop very high-quality videogames (For consoles) Especially when attention to detail is important. However, Unity has a lot of features for those who want to develop a variety of apps for different technologies. The clear purpose and …
Chose Unity
Unity offer more variety and more library assets in comparison with any other game development platform out there. The price and support is what actually separate unity from others as you wouldn't get any quality with such cheap prices in any other platform. The unity platform …
Chose Unity
Unity offers a professional environment, better preparing students for a career in game development. It also has a tremendous amount of documentation, allowing for a large independent study of the program and environment. It also provides for flexibility in assets, making the …
Chose Unity
I've also spent years with Unreal. And while it's a great engine, if anyone isn't sure what to use I think Unity is the right one to pick. Things will be easier and with no downsides.
Chose Unity
The ease of use of Corona although superior to unity does not stack up to an overall better experience. Unity asset store needs some work period the Corona asset store is brilliant. In Android studio getting the simple projects to build is very time consuming and worthwhile. In …
Chose Unity
The main competitors of Unity are Unreal Engine, Cry Engine, Game Maker Studio, RPG Maker and Godot (none of those were available in the list). I've tested Unreal and Game Maker. I've chosen Unity because of these factors: It's simple to get started, the great community behind …
Chose Unity
Depending on the assignment/project/client requirements, students may utilize Unity or Adobe XD. Unity works well for creating 2D and 3D video games and some UI-based software that requires multiple levels of interactivity. Adobe XD is often used by our students when using in …
Chose Unity
Unreal Engine is a fantastic piece of software but it has a much steeper learning curve and an arcane, idiosyncratic way of developing software that is quite foreign. Unity uses some similar concepts to Adobe Flex, which we've always found easy and sensible. It is also easier …
Chose Unity
Unreal and CryEngine are both the direct competitors of Unity. Both were designed for high-end games (AAA games), while Unity was designed with the indie game designer in mind. This way, historically, Unreal and Cryengine used to be very expensive, hard to set up and understand …
Verenia CPQ

No answer on this topic

Features
UnityVerenia CPQ
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Product A and Product B
Unity
-
Ratings
Verenia CPQ
9.7
Ratings
11% above category average
Quote sharing/sending00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Product configuration00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Configuration options00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Pricing rules00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
UnityVerenia CPQ
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

SAP Sales Cloud
SAP Sales Cloud
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
UnityVerenia CPQ
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
UnityVerenia CPQ
Likelihood to Recommend
Unity can cover most of the needs of game development, both for 2D and 3D. It is particularly well suited to games designed to be played presented and played on web pages, but it can create high-end content as well. Perhaps it would be less suited in high-end games which depend to much of sophisticated lighting effects since Cryengine and Unreal are more evolved in this area. On the other extreme, in the case of very simple 2D games for web pages, like newsgames, simpler game engines probably would be more advisable for a faster production, like Construct (2 or 3) or even Twine (in case of text adventures)
Read full review
I recommend this software to all companies that make their own products, as it helps them with all the sales management, from product creation, details, and features, to sales with customers, invoicing, and budgeting. It has worked very well for us and we have had no major problems.
Read full review
Pros
  • Great and simple interface.
  • Good pricing model for independent developers.
  • Powerful and flexible tool for making video games.
  • Great library of assets to save time in the asset store.
Read full review
  • Thanks to the pricing rules tool, we can determine the final price of the products, for different customers, depending on the location of the customer, the type of product, the number of products, and other rules that can be easily configured.
  • I like that the software allows user access by roles, so that team members can have access only to parts of the program, according to their department, and make changes to products, design, prices, costs, sales, etc., according to their tasks within the project.
  • I love that from the same software all departments can work, from design, making drawings of products in 2d and 3d, finance with invoice management and even marketing and sales, with a guide of questions and recommendations provided by the software to improve sales.
Read full review
Cons
  • Integration of disparate technologies required to build an application.
  • Streamline the versioning process using the hub, it's great so far.
  • Keep improving the ML learning models for AI.
Read full review
  • To have better accuracy using Verenia CPQ requires more clicks than necessary, as we have not been able to fully automate all tasks for our end user when quoting each product individually.
  • Sometimes the API integration and synchronization fails and that generates errors in invoices and problems to catalog certain materials.
  • Verenia CPQ does not allow editing existing configurations, if we want to give our own signature we must create new configurations from clean templates.
Read full review
Usability
It's actually incredibly easy to use given the complex tasks you have. Once you learn the various windows it becomes second nature. Compared to something like Blender (which I would probably rate as a 2 on usability), the learning curve of Unity is a breeze! The only improvements I can think of would be to streamline some common workflows so you don't have to dig through menus to find them.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have not had to use Unity's support extensively. This is likely because there is so much documentation and so many classes available for free online. Due to this, there is little need for support. They were very responsive when I requested educational licensing. Setting it up and providing it all quickly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Unreal Engine is a fantastic piece of software but it has a much steeper learning curve and an arcane, idiosyncratic way of developing software that is quite foreign. Unity uses some similar concepts to Adobe Flex, which we've always found easy and sensible. It is also easier to go to Unity having either a Java or C# background. We also explored using Android Studio and Xcode on their own for AR experiences and that is a suitable option depending on the use case, but Unity is still a great tool for rapid prototyping and even for building finished, shipped apps.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Saving money on construction design costs
  • Saved money on finding issues before they arise
  • Created a platform to per-cue future investments
Read full review
  • Verenia CPQ has expanded us in the current business making our profits surpass records from several years ago.
  • All of our employees feel secure and confident because of all the tools that Verenia CPQ has given us over the years.
Read full review
ScreenShots