Webexpenses vs. Yooz

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Webexpenses
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Webexpenses is a global provider of spend management solutions, combining integrated Expense Cards with cloud-based software for businesses of all sizes across 70+ countries. Serving industries such as retail, finance, technology, construction, and not-for-profit, Webexpenses gives businesses control over company spending by automating processes, proactively enforcing policies, and controlling costs. Features The Webexpenses…N/A
Yooz
Score 8.4 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Yooz delivers intelligent financial operations automation that aims to reduce waste, mitigate risk, prevent fraud, and eliminate errors from the AP process. Yooz provides Lean Financial Operations™ for companies of all sizes, offering clarity and control in the most complex environments. The Yooz platform combines a workflow engine, real-time applied AI, and transparency, with advanced fraud detection. Boasting over 7,000 customers worldwide and processing more than 300 million…N/A
Pricing
WebexpensesYooz
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
WebexpensesYooz
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$250 nullNo setup fee
Additional DetailsSubscription price based on the volume of documents processed. Unlimited number of users. 4 hours of complimentary service to start.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
WebexpensesYooz
Considered Both Products
Webexpenses
Chose Webexpenses
this is the only apps we used for the same purpose
Chose Webexpenses
Webexpenses is easier to use and understand to me and my colleagues. you literally can just look at the page and you can see the hwole graph of everything and the pie chart that is displayed so that you dont have to figure it out yourself
Chose Webexpenses
I cannot remember the name of the product I used previously but compared to that this one is a lot more user friendly and efficient.
Chose Webexpenses
Webexpenses can be integrated with accounting and payroll software (like Sage, SAP, or QuickBooks) for seamless processing and reporting.
Chose Webexpenses
I used an internal programme in CBRE Ireland and it was not user friendly and you'd have to input the same information over and over for every expense added.
Chose Webexpenses
Previously have not used any.
Chose Webexpenses
For me, Webexpenses is slightly better than Concur, but I was not involved in selecting it over Concur.
Chose Webexpenses
Webexpenses was chosen as they were very responsive, flexible and qualitative at the beginning, not anymore, after 4 years.
Chose Webexpenses
Previously i had only used excel sheets for my expenses
Chose Webexpenses
The biggest difference between Webexpenses and Concur honestly lie in the simplicity of what is needed from the employee and their expenses. Concur asks for a lot of itemization sometimes and may even have to import other receipts and invoices that are spent by the employee and …
Chose Webexpenses
Webexpenses is, from what I remember as it was about 6 years ago I used it, very similar to Concur. Find both easy to use.
Chose Webexpenses
They are different systems so I can not compare them against each other but these systems are more user friendly.
Chose Webexpenses
I would say SAP Concur is slightly easier to use that Webexpenses
Chose Webexpenses
I am unable to provide any detail to this question as I have not used these products, but I am aware of these products and other applications.
Chose Webexpenses
Immediate reporting, saving time at the end of the month.
Chose Webexpenses
I was not part of the decision team; the system was introduced before I joined the company.
Chose Webexpenses
The ease of use of the platform has been the biggest benefit of this system. We didn't need to provide any structured training to our staff, we just sent out the link and people were able to intuitively use the platform. Other competitors were harder to navigate and to use.
Chose Webexpenses
I much prefer Web Expenses to Concur. Although one functionality that Concur had, a user could email their receipts from the registered user email to Concur then these receipts would be available for the user add to their expense claim.
Yooz
Chose Yooz
PDF is too much slow in OCR reading, comparing to Yooz. you can't compare it even.
Chose Yooz
Chrome River is slow and full of inconsistencies. Capturing invoices is confusing, as you have to assign approvers and coding at that time. No time to save it and research those details. It has multiple screens labeled inbox but are for different stages in the approval process …
Chose Yooz
it better with uploading invoice and easier to use and very assessable and easy to learn and has a lot of verification so errors on payments are avoided and also used to know which invoice is late and needs to be paid and coded
Chose Yooz
I did not choose yooz myself as it was a company decision
Chose Yooz
They are all different for each other. In our scenario, since we do not use QuickBooks as our software system, Yooz works better with integration to Sage Intacct
Chose Yooz
Yooz is much more user friendly and provides more features
Chose Yooz
We looked at other products when we chose Yooz and all were comparable, the key focus was that Yooz integrated with our ERP
Chose Yooz
Yooz has better accuracy and it is more automated to do tasks itself.
Chose Yooz
We used POs or excel sheets you had to manually enter and scan in invoices so it was definitely a pain and super time consuming.
Chose Yooz
We liked Yooz better and it was competitive on the monthly payment basis
Chose Yooz
Our corporate team chose the switch - I see why the change and it is beneficial, however, not very time saving!
Chose Yooz
Have not used other products in the past. This one is great! Don't plan on changing !
Chose Yooz
Yooz is more simple to use but doesn't have as many features.
Chose Yooz
Yooz comes close to Coupa, but Coupa is much more robust and can handle much larger batches of information.

Yooz performed well against Bank of America's Checkbook product, because it was more efficient.
Chose Yooz
Selected Yooz because of the dynamic workflow ability.
Chose Yooz
Deltek Maconomy, Citrix Endpoint Management and KlearStack
Features
WebexpensesYooz
Expense Management
Comparison of Expense Management features of Product A and Product B
Webexpenses
8.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Yooz
-
Ratings
Employee Expense Reporting8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Corporate Card Reconciliation8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Payment Management
Comparison of Payment Management features of Product A and Product B
Webexpenses
8.2
Ratings
0% above category average
Yooz
8.3
Ratings
11% above category average
Customizable Approval Policies8.10 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Financial Document Management7.80 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Payment Status Tracking8.20 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Payment Audit Trail8.60 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Duplicate Bill Detection8.10 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Advanced OCR7.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Electronic Funds Transfer8.70 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Accounts Payable
Comparison of Accounts Payable features of Product A and Product B
Webexpenses
-
Ratings
Yooz
7.8
Ratings
16% above category average
Automated Accounts Payable Processes00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Vendor Management00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
WebexpensesYooz
Small Businesses
Dext
Dext
Score 9.8 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Precoro
Precoro
Score 2.8 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Emburse Chrome River
Emburse Chrome River
Score 9.2 out of 10
Webexpenses
Webexpenses
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
WebexpensesYooz
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.2
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
WebexpensesYooz
Likelihood to Recommend
Really suits me well for making mileage claims, the map works well and it has an accurate log of addresses. Very handy and easy to be able to add any necessary receipts. Could be a good idea to include live road closures? but I understand that's quite tricky to do. Really easy to be able to move routes when you have gone a different way than recommended.
Read full review
when you have put the amount in, and the amount does not match the invoice yooz sends an alert to indicate that there is a missing amount that you have not added, and it also helps to let you know when some invoice amounts are more than the usual get for that vendor so you can take note
Read full review
Pros
  • imports credit card transactions from our corporate card program without issue
  • allows for easy set up of new users
  • is a very intuitive, easy to learn tool
  • has a very responsive support and customer service team
  • Set up and configuration was thorough, and they were able to work through our unique issues, such as custom segments in NetSuite.
  • It is a very inexpensive product. Well worth the cost.
Read full review
  • Strong integtation with Intacct (our GL)
  • Strong OCR capabilities that capture the key information of an invoice with accuracy
  • Very responsive Support Team if we encounter a problem or have a question.
  • In depth documentation for users (pdf's videos) to learn the product
Read full review
Cons
  • When you click add receipts after putting the details of your expense, you get the impression that you have done something incorrect from the prompt that you receive
  • Two options for adding receipts can confuse people when training them on how to use
  • An easy to access FAQ would be helpful
Read full review
  • when exporting we have to change the total column's to numbers or it will export with the incorrect totals.
  • Yooz needs to not allow itself to add a line to the total and change what you are posting. instead it needs to freeze you from moving on.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It depends if alternative systems for other functions (HR / Payroll) have expenses functionality included as a supplementary service. If they’re part of a total system then having a separate system for expenses when another system provides the functionality (even if mildly less efficient, etc) then it wouldn’t be viable
Read full review
ALSOME PROGRAM MAKE EVERYDAY SO MUCH EASIER
Read full review
Usability
Based on what I have used it for, it was very easy to use and navigate. The approval process was already setup on the back end so there was no confusion on my end. Notifications were sent to my email based on status which made it helpful to understand where an expense was in the process.
Read full review
Usability of Yooz is close to 10, solves the issue that many companies have and serve to its purpose. The platform is simple, but well design and it is always improving. Since we started using it almost 8 months ago, the invoicing process of our company enhanced sharply. But there is also room for improvement that is why a 9/10
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
it is always available when I need it
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Some times image uploads can be slow and you have to alter the image resolution to increase the speed
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The support for the initial setup was great, but since then we have only had to contact support once when we had problems uploading credit card files. The help we received at this time was not good and we ended up trying various things until we resolved the problem ourselves. The online support tutorials are good, but searching for a specific issue is difficult.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
All went well.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
It was difficult to train multiple people via video, as they learned at different speeds, and most of the user champions were not as capable with systems and finance processes as our dept.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
As long as you have people that are fully aware of the setup steps to get users into the software then I would see no issues arising for any company.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The ease of use of the platform has been the biggest benefit of this system. We didn't need to provide any structured training to our staff, we just sent out the link and people were able to intuitively use the platform. Other competitors were harder to navigate and to use.
Read full review
Chrome River is slow and full of inconsistencies. Capturing invoices is confusing, as you have to assign approvers and coding at that time. No time to save it and research those details. It has multiple screens labeled inbox but are for different stages in the approval process that aren't specified unless you go into the invoice and review. When you go to exit the invoice, it takes you back to the main menu instead of the inbox you were currently working in. It is live, but the updates are every 10-15 minutes as opposed to immediately.
Read full review
Scalability
because as the business has grown to has the user base
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Easy integration with your existing finance / accounting software.
  • Lot of time is being saved in maintaining records and now going completely online.
  • Love the option of Scan receipts with Google-vision-powered optical character. This also resulted in less use of paper in our office.
Read full review
  • Yooz helped us process thousands of invoices in a more efficient manner than our previous process called Checkbook with Bank of America.
  • Yooz allowed for a more efficient invoice approval process than the previous systems that were used. If the invoices were three way matched, they would be processed quicker.
  • Yooz made the integration of the invoice and credit memo process into NetSuite more efficient than the previous software, however, there some limitations with Yooz because it did allow for duplicate invoices to be processed, and that was a big issue.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Webexpenses Screenshots

Screenshot of the Webexpenses mobile app, that captures receipts instantly.Screenshot of Webexpenses, accessed through a desktop, iOS, Android or Windows device.Screenshot of mileage tracking with Webexpenses.Screenshot of a display of expense-related spend, reported and tracked with customisable reports.Screenshot of the mobile app, where users' expenses can be built, submitted and approved.Screenshot of Webexpenses payments and expense reimbursements.

Yooz Screenshots

Screenshot of how Yooz works - The solution provides artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies to help AP teams with invoice automation.Screenshot of Purchase: Automates PR/PO and approvals using workflows. Additionally users can create purchase requests, automate approval workflows, automatically generate purchase orders, manage deliveries and monitor the budget.Screenshot of Capture: AI based data extraction to extract invoices. Works for almost any format (PDF, Factur-X, UBL, CII, EDIFACT, etc.)Screenshot of No touch: Intelligent workflows to automate approvals and paymentsScreenshot of Pay: A Digital Invoice Payment Workflow. Invoices can be paid individually or as a batch,  and vendors receive payment through Virtual Card, ACH, eCheck, or Paper Check.Screenshot of Export: Invoice capture and automation that integrates with accounting software, or with more than 200 ERPs worldwide.