Weel vs. Zip Intake-to-Procure

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Weel
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Weel (formerly DiviPay) is a virtual corporate card and expense management platform from the company of the same name in Surry Hills, that aims to enable finance teams to better manage, control and streamline spending across their organisation.
$135
per month
Zip Intake-to-Procure
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.N/A
Pricing
WeelZip Intake-to-Procure
Editions & Modules
Basic
$135
per month
Premium
$375
per month
Enterprise
$2025
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
WeelZip Intake-to-Procure
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAll pricing is in Australian Dollars. FX rate of 0.95%. Prices exclusive of GST.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
WeelZip Intake-to-Procure
Considered Both Products
Weel
Chose Weel
Weel has very easy user interface, it is easy to go around the system and support is very knowledgeable if you need any help. AMEX is not as user friendly as Weel and top of it, Weel provides good integration with Xero accounting system. Dashboard is very visible by all …
Zip Intake-to-Procure
Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure
I prefer Zip for its for its user-friendly interface and ease of adoption, especially if the organization values a simpler and more intuitive system for users across various departments. Comparatively, Zip is a more budget-friendly solution compared to some enterprise-level …
Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure
Zip Intake-to-Procure focuses on streamlined data collection and form submissions while Coupa is primarily a comprehensive spend management platform. Zip Intake-to-Procure simplifies data gathering and Coupa is more for broader financial management solutions. Zip …
Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure
There are more reporting insights and better data visualization summaries in Zip Intake-to-Procure vs. Coupa (from when I last used it in 2022).

Zip Intake-to-Procure also feels a bit fresher and has a better UI experience than Coupa. The user experience is pretty …
Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure
ZIP had much better UI and had Okta integration, Tipalti had neither.
Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure
Zip is by far the easiest to implement and configure, dramatically reducing the speed to value. Setup and creation of workflows to align with approval processes can be done within weeks and there is no limit to the number of approval flows that can be created. There are value …
Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure
Zip created the best end-to-end solution vs the other solutions we reviewed. The user interface is easy and simple for first-time users to navigate. The user adoption was quick due to the visible approval chain. The Zip support team is top-notch and compared to the competitors, …
Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure
We selected Zip Intake-to-Procure to solve vendor onboarding, vendor-related purchasing, and compliance issues.
Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure

We haven’t really used another service like Zip before. Generally, we use Netsuite.


Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure
  • Zip Intake-to-Procure has a easy to use tool with the ability to make changes as our organization evolves whereas the other tools require more time or technical support to make changes.
  • Zip Intake-to-Procure has more of a buy side focus than DocuSign CLM
  • Zip Intake-to-Procure has …
Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure
Venminder and Tipalti Approve
Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure
We truly haven’t found other products like Zip.
Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure

Zip absolutely wins when it comes to complex purchases and flexible workflows.


Chose Zip Intake-to-Procure
Truth be told, we haven’t seen any other similar products. The alternative was manually tracking in Google Sheets, ticketing systems, and in NetSuite. Coupa was probably the closest in terms of what we were looking for but they were not willing to fit it to our needs like Zip …
Best Alternatives
WeelZip Intake-to-Procure
Small Businesses
Rippling
Rippling
Score 8.9 out of 10
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Lola.com
Lola.com
Score 8.0 out of 10
Precoro
Precoro
Score 2.8 out of 10
Enterprises
GEP SMART
GEP SMART
Score 7.3 out of 10
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
WeelZip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
WeelZip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend
Weel is well suited for businesses where there are multiple teams and if each team needs to track of their budget. It also suits if there are new projects and each project has its own team and team incurs expenses for the business. For example, if there is a construction project and each team needs to use their credit cards to pay some instant expenses, weel is well suited to assign a budget to the team so team does not spend more than what they are assigned (or can be approved) and it is easy to issue/cancel cards on the fly
Read full review
Zip is a newer product in the P2P space, and as such there are still some areas for improvement. They don't have all the "bells and whistles" products and configurations that some of the other players in this space have, but the products they do offer are best in class. Zip is an ideal tool for tactical procurement.
Read full review
Pros
  • Digital Credit Card
  • Team Budget
  • Instantly issuing a credit card
  • Tracking expenses and reimbursements
Read full review
  • No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org.
  • Visibility to the user in a great user interface
  • Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything
  • The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool
Read full review
Cons
  • Mobile application of Reimbursements
Read full review
  • Missing the ability to proxy as another user. Currently, if one approver did not set up their delegation, an admin or the approver of that step must reassign each of the approvals to another person.
  • Bulk upload options for admins to update queues and subqueues.
  • Missing ability to schedule reports or the option to share a saved view with another user. It would be easier if certain filtered views can be shared with others to avoid each user having to create their own views.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Incredibly responsive and helpful.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Weel has very easy user interface, it is easy to go around the system and support is very knowledgeable if you need any help. AMEX is not as user friendly as Weel and top of it, Weel provides good integration with Xero accounting system. Dashboard is very visible by all employees and users
Read full review
Truth be told, we haven’t seen any other similar products. The alternative was manually tracking in Google Sheets, ticketing systems, and in NetSuite. Coupa was probably the closest in terms of what we were looking for but they were not willing to fit it to our needs like Zip was able to.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We used to waste our time to chase the bank to get and issue a card for employees, it is almost instant to do it via Weel.
  • We spent hours to keep track of reimbursement expenses and employees had to wait to get paid back but with Weel, it is all automated and approval process is very visible.
Read full review
  • Zip Intake-to-Procure has helped clean up forecasting for us - we've improved accuracy by over 30% since now we're forcing folks to make sure spend is captured accurately and checking submitted PO amounts against the bottoms up forecast
  • We've also been able to leverage the SLA insights provided by Zip Intake-to-Procure to increase operational efficiencies. We're identified orgs that are slowing down the overall approval process and putting more pressure with shorter SLA times.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Weel Screenshots

Screenshot of

Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Zip supports ultra-configurable, parallel workflows with our no-code configuration.Screenshot of Zip also integrates with all major ticketing, CLM, GRC, and ERP/P2P solutions. Here's an example integration card for JIRA.Screenshot of Zip has an optional vendor-facing portal for the vendor to provide diligence materials, including documents, surveys, and even bank settlement information.Screenshot of Zip's vendor-facing portal includes an optional bank settlement form with an attestation.