Clari Copilot helps revenue teams win revenue-critical moments. Clari Copilot’s conversation intelligence platform gives reps and managers tools to compete, spot revenue leak, and close deals. It offers: Real-time battlecards and monologue alerts, so reps can navigate objections with ease and learn from winning behavior. And managers can track rep performance…
$720
per year per rep
Zoom Revenue Accelerator
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Zoom Revenue Accelerator , the evolution of Zoom IQ, is a conversation intelligence tool, available for users of Zoom Meetings.
We evaluated wingman, gong and chorus. Settled on Wingman because of their features and then being cost effective as well. I've used Gong before in an earlier organization but would vouch for Wingman over Gong primarily because Gong is very expensive. Wingman provides the best …
The alternative seem to provide way, more features and tools and rack, chili and heated, and it made it harder to use it out of the box and understand as a whole. Wingman does a good job with providing the right features and keeping things simple.
No, we just bought wingman, no other products its the best; the leadership team looked at it last year and since then our life is being easy and I am in Customer Success, so I don't have that knowledge about that as we do not need training cards but will try real time insights …
We have used fireflies also for our meetings and its similar to wingman but considering the intelligence which wingman brings fireflies doesn't have that much robust intelligence in reporting. You can use fireflies but when you use wingman you will actually feel the accuracy …
Customer services reps are readily available. Every time I have questions they answer really fast and are open to having a meeting. I think the customer service makes us stick with them.
We recommend wingman because it is more cost-effective and easy to use. It plugs right into Gmail and zoom so it's very easy to log in and out of. I recommend wingman because they have great support to help with any issues that come up while using the platform which is a great …
Wingman is much cheaper than Gong, but Gong appears to have stronger analysis tools. When customers ask us what is the extra person in our Zoom call, we just call it our "Gong" tool.
We evaluated Gong and Chorus and we felt that each competitor had feature parity, meaning each of the competitors didn't have wildly different offerings. When it came down to our needs at the time, we really just needed a tool to help with a share of voice and rep training. We …
I have used Gong and ExecVision, I would say that those are on opposite ends of the spectrum of offering a full suite of call recording, coaching, and AI. Wingman is much more comparable to Gong and was so easy to onboard, integrate, and get up and running for our team's needs. …
Zoom fit into our workflow better than the rest. While all the other tools certainly worked well, and could do the job, we felt the most comfortable with Zoom. In particular the ease of use. Specifically, at the time we were assessing the tools Aircall was a product we had used …
Salesforce Sales AI auto updates records in SF. Provides predictions, trends & insights into deals. Generative call summaries, key take-aways, prospecting low code & fully integrated in SF. We chose Zoom Revenue Accelerator because is complemented our requirement of Zoom …
Zoom Revenue Accelerator gives us better automatic metrics than Gong, better conversational parsing, and very valuable follow up data. We went with Revenue Accelerator so we could get those benefits and also simplify our tech stack by vertically integrating video calls with …
I mainly went with Zoom Revenue Accelerator because I wanted it to work very well, as natively as possible, with the Zoom ecosystem we have at my company.
We use Zoom for our meetings, and in some teams we also use Zoom Phone, which also works quite well with Zoom Revenue …
For sales management, Gong has greater more useful tools and an easier user interface making it easier specially for managers to organize coaching and feedback calls per rep. Chorus.ai does mainly the same but lags behind Gong on user experience so I won´t put this as a pro …
I use Zoom IQ as the first software of this type provided for free by my University. Although other similar software (Webex) is also used at my University, I have never used it. So I do not know what to say about it. My other colleagues at the University also do not use similar …
Gong is another great tool and primarily focused on conversion. Zoom IQ is kind of add on over your Zoom but Gong is only conversion focused so little edge over that. But zooms accuracy we found to be better in certain cases when compared to gong. Zoom is more easier to use as …
Zoom IQ is the easiest interface in my opinion and it also integrates with zoom which most companies already use on a regular basis. The price point is the same to its competition. For us it was a no brainer.
They have a wide variety of services that they are willing to negotiate and bundle into the deal. They are easy to work with and have a seamless way to integrate with our system.
Chorus.AI is very similar to Zoom IQ. I think the sales team should invest in either product. I was not involved in the purchasing process so I am not sure why one company was chosen over the other for us to work with.
Zoom IQ is much better than most of its competitors. As I've said Zoom helped us a lot in our business so that is the reason why the company has chosen Zoom IQ. It is relatively much cheaper than most of its competitors as well. Easy to use (slightly) and user friendly.
We already use zoom as our virtual meeting platform and the integrations this tool has with our existing tech stack were seamless. That was the major reason for us to select Zoom IQ over Level AI.
The features these sales enablement tools provide are pretty much the same in the aspect of usability and functionality. The advantage Zoom IQ gets over others is easy of integrating it with the default communication and collaboration tool from Zoom. Keeping things connected …
Gong had to many features that would have done unused, Zoom IQ was a way to start out and get things going and making sure there was a for for sales IQ in the sales department before going all in
I would say that Webex is almost similar to Zoom in regards to the enhancements and usage. The UI of Webex is a bit simpler. Whereas the zoom UI has a lot of information and a first-time user might need some time to get used to it. Zoom is way very inferior to GoToMeeting …
For the overall monitoring of sales calls and validating claims, it is a great tool and does exactly what we need. A change that would be great would be the ability to set a condition for any member on the system to either be able to download transcripts or prohibit downloading transcripts without them needing to be made admins. We have the finance department that often needs access to the transcripts as evidence in Stripe disputes, but they have to be made an admin to be able to download the transcript even though they don't actively use Wingman except for downloading transcripts.
Training on key features is difficult, so adoption of the platform is not where we would like it to be after 6 months of being deployed. Our team works primarily within Salesforce, so it would be helpful to have additional focus on adding ZRA components to the Salesforce managed package. Would love to see on overall customer summary for example. Rather than having to go to each conversation to get details of the customer journey. The price point for ZRA is quite high compared to meetings & phone so I would like to see continuous growth/new features being released to justify the spend. With ZRA, the sales leaders can share tactics and use cases on how they utilize ZRA to manage their individual teams. The analytics easily shows team members who are exceeding or who may need additional support based on (overall customer sentiment & engagement).
Super user friendly tool! There are some features that I think might be improved over time, like navigation assistance or tutorials, and quick tips, like how to ensure calls always get recorded, how to add Wingman to calls last-minute, or how to use their playlist feature Game Tapes, but those are nice to haves, not need to haves.
Once you're through the setup it couldn't be easier. For our client facing team members it was very much an experience of. Today you're using "App A" and tomorrow log into Zoom and you're all setup. Zoom Revenue Accelerator is effortless for an end user to pick up and start using. But the setup is where you need help to understand. Various things with where recordings are stored, how calls are routed, and even who can access what phone numbers and recordings can be challenging to setup without help. And a number of docs aren't as up to date as they could be, given the Zoom UI can change so rapidly. Once they solve the sprawling admin side of the product, it'll be a 10 out of 10.
We evaluated wingman, Gong and chorus. Settled on Wingman because of their features and then being cost effective as well. I've used Gong before in an earlier organization but would vouch for Wingman over Gong primarily because Gong is very expensive. Wingman provides the best bang for buck in the sales intelligence ecosystem
Zoom fit into our workflow better than the rest. While all the other tools certainly worked well, and could do the job, we felt the most comfortable with Zoom. In particular the ease of use. Specifically, at the time we were assessing the tools Aircall was a product we had used for a number of years, but call quality was not something that came often. And we'd have as many as 35% of calls drop due to connection issues. (Not an issue with Zoom, call quality is >98%). Dialpad was also one we extensively tested and trialed. It felt far better suited to a team larger then us, and one with a broader Support function then our initial use case. The Salesforce offering just felt the most expensive for the least value. While it would work probably the best with our CRM, it was clunky to operate from an end user POV.