Wolfram Mathematica

Wolfram Mathematica

30 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Mathematica	Score8.2 out of 10	N/A	Wolfram's flagship product Mathematica is a modern technical computing application featuring a flexible symbolic coding language and a wide array of graphing and data visualization capabilities.	$1,520 per year

Pricing

Mathematica

Standard Cloud: $1,520
per year
Standard Desktop: $3,040
one-time fee
Standard Desktop & Cloud: $3,344
one-time fee
Mathematica Enterprise Edition: $8,150.00
one-time fee

Pricing Offerings
Mathematica
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

Discounts available for students and educational institutions. The Network Edition reduce per-user license costs through shared deployment across any number of machines on a local-area network.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Mathematica
Considered Both Products	Wolfram Steffen Jäschke Projektspezialist bei Steffen Jäschke EinzUnt Physik, Berechnungen in Corporate at Selbstständig (Professional Training & Coaching, 1-10 employees) Chose Mathematica There is no other alternative that Maple from Maplesoft all over. There are other systems for mCAx that do not offer the richness and coverage of mathematical features. For example Matlab that restricts inself to matrice calculation and only the the right set of addon library … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Mathematica Well, Mathematica is free at my university. As a graduate student, you can download and install Mathematica in your device after log in through your university email. Second, it has very nice platform. You can use Mathematica for many data analysis such as plotting, integration … Incentivized Helpful? Yaj Bhattacharya Director in Research & Development at Info-Tech Research Group (Information Technology and Services, 501-1000 employees) Chose Mathematica MATLAB is an excellent tool, but it can't handle analytic manipulations in algebra, calculus and differential equations. MATLAB is superior when it comes to a less steep learning curve. In terms of using only one tool for analytic and numerical calculations, Mathematica wins. … Incentivized Helpful? Rounak Jangir Ab Initio Developer in Research & Development at Tata Consultancy Services (Information Technology and Services, 10,001+ employees) Chose Mathematica Mathematica is good solution in some cases but doesn't perform well in other regions. Mathematica is good in solving mathematical problems but not performs well in machine learning areas. I would suggest to use TensorFlow or Keras for machine learning. Also it performs good for … Incentivized Helpful? Robert J. Lang Artist/Consultant at Langorigami.com (Design, 1-10 employees) Chose Mathematica The ability to manipulate algebraic expressions, nested lists, and data structures in Mathematica was unequalled when I first did the comparison. Since then, I've stuck with Mathematica mostly because it's "the tool I know." Incentivized Helpful? George Danner Founder \| President in Corporate at Business Laboratory LLC \| Solving Complex Business Problems With Science (Executive Office, 1-10 employees) Chose Mathematica We have evaluated and are using in some cases the Python language in concert with the Jupyter notebook interface. For UI, we using libraries like React to create visually stunning visualizations of such models. Mathematica compares favorably to this alternative in terms of … Incentivized Helpful? Shalinee Singh Software Engineer in Information Technology at COVIAM (Information Technology and Services, 201-500 employees) Chose Mathematica We selected Wolfram Mathematica as it offers lot of functionality that other products like MATLAB or sageMath do not have. And it also has advantages on the feature that it does share in common with other tools like sageMath, MATLAB etc. It is more powerful than MATLAB. It … Incentivized Helpful? Gaurav Yadav Software Developer in Engineering at COVIAM (Information Technology and Services, 201-500 employees) Chose Mathematica I think IBM Watson Analytics is good alternative to Wolfram Mathematica. A few advantages of Mathematica over IBM Analytics is that Mathematica comes with a lot of inbuilt things like neural networks, predictive analysis geometry. And IBM analytics does not show the step by … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

Features

Mathematica

Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Wolfram Mathematica
Feature	Wolfram Mathematica 9.9 6 Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports	9.84 Ratings
Customizable dashboards	9.94 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates	9.96 Ratings

Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Wolfram Mathematica
Feature	Wolfram Mathematica 9.9 9 Ratings
Drill-down analysis	9.98 Ratings
Formatting capabilities	9.98 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages	9.97 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration	9.99 Ratings

Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Wolfram Mathematica
Feature	Wolfram Mathematica 9.3 8 Ratings
Publish to Web	9.97 Ratings
Publish to PDF	9.08 Ratings
Report Versioning	9.97 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling	8.95 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers	8.95 Ratings

Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Wolfram Mathematica
Feature	Wolfram Mathematica 9.9 9 Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)	9.99 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization	9.98 Ratings
Predictive Analytics	9.98 Ratings

User Ratings
	Mathematica
Likelihood to Recommend	9.9 (9 ratings)
Support Rating	9.5 (2 ratings)