| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Bouncer | Score8.2 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Bouncer is a secure SaaS e-mail verification and deliverability platform designed for strong coverage and performance (up to 200,000 verified e-mails per hour per customer). Boasting users from 5000+ companies, Bouncer aims to be a solution for any business size. | $8 one-time fee for 1000 credits (the pay-as-you-go minimum) |
 ZeroBounce | Score10 out of 10 | N/A | ZeroBounce is an email list validator that removes all invalid email addresses to prevent bounces and preserve the sender's reputation. | $18 one-time fee 2,000 emails |
| Bouncer | ZeroBounce | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | ZeroBounce offers monthly plans for starting at 2,000 email addresses that start from $18 per month. They also offer pay-as-you-go volume pricing that decreases as you scale, with credits that never expire. Enterprise customers who need to validate more than 1,000,000 email addresses per month should contact the ZeroBounce sales team for a customized quote. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Bouncer | ZeroBounce | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Bouncer Bouncer got better bounce rates. I also tried Dropcontact alone, but the bounce rates were above 5%. Bouncer helped me to lower my bounce rates between 2-5%, which is excellent. The pricing is good and it has a Woodpecker integration, which is another tool I use. It makes my … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Bouncer Both products offer more or less the same features. Zero Bounce is a bit more extensive when it comes to the level of details provided for each validation. Bouncer is more focused on simpler result categorization. When it comes to the response times, availability and accuracy, … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Bouncer Bouncer was a superior option in regards of quality and price. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Bouncer We have used many validation softwares buy we choose Bouncer because they provide us a good validation, fast and simple to use. For validation bouncer is fast and easier to use than other platforms I have could to use in the past. They bring good validation results. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Bouncer | ZeroBounce | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | - |
| Usability | 9.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Implementation Rating | 9.1 | - |
