Insights from BrowserStack Reviewers
Based on 16 verified reviews published in the last 18 months
Please select which BrowserStack product(s) you used:
16 answeredThis report analyzes 16 recent reviews to identify the BrowserStack products used by reviewers. App Automate was mentioned by 5 reviewers, while App Live, Automate, and Live were each mentioned by 4 reviewers. Due to the small sample size, these findings should be interpreted as directional rather than definitive.
App Automate
5 mentionsApp Automate is identified as one of the BrowserStack products used by 5 reviewers. The reviews mention the use of App…
App Automate is identified as one of the BrowserStack products used by 5 reviewers. The reviews mention the use of App Automate for their testing needs.
Live
4 mentionsThe Live product is mentioned by 4 reviewers. These reviews refer to the Live product for testing and development.
The Live product is mentioned by 4 reviewers. These reviews refer to the Live product for testing and development.
Automate
4 mentionsFour reviewers mention using Automate. These reviewers highlight the general use of the Automate product.
Four reviewers mention using Automate. These reviewers highlight the general use of the Automate product.
App Live
4 mentionsApp Live is mentioned by 4 reviewers as a BrowserStack product they utilized. These reviewers specifically point to App…
App Live is mentioned by 4 reviewers as a BrowserStack product they utilized. These reviewers specifically point to App Live for their testing and development processes.
What positive or negative impact (i.e. Return on Investment or ROI) has BrowserStack had on your overall business objectives?
16 answeredThis report analyzes 16 recent product reviews to assess BrowserStack's return on investment. Reviewers most frequently cited cost savings and improved testing as positive impacts on their business objectives. Specifically, 6 of 16 reviewers mentioned cost savings achieved by reducing reliance on physical devices. Another 5 of 16 reviewers highlighted improvements in testing efficiency, including time savings in cross-device testing and bug capture. While the overall sentiment is positive, it's important to acknowledge that this analysis is based on a small sample size, and individual experiences may vary. Two reviewers noted that BrowserStack helped them find bugs and reduce glitches, while another two mentioned improvements to performance and efficiency. These factors collectively contribute to the perceived ROI of BrowserStack, though the limited review volume warrants cautious interpretation.
Cost savings
6 mentionsA significant benefit reported by users is the cost savings realized through BrowserStack. Six of the 16 reviewers spec…
A significant benefit reported by users is the cost savings realized through BrowserStack. Six of the 16 reviewers specifically mentioned this aspect, noting that the platform eliminates the need for maintaining a physical device lab and reduces reliance on physical devices. This leads to a decrease in capital expenditure and operational costs associated with device maintenance.
Improved testing
5 mentionsReviewers also frequently praised BrowserStack for improving their testing processes. Five of the 16 reviewers cited ga…
Reviewers also frequently praised BrowserStack for improving their testing processes. Five of the 16 reviewers cited gains in efficiency and effectiveness, including time savings during cross-device testing and streamlined bug capture. The ability to conduct thorough testing before launch was also seen as minimizing potential losses.
Bugs and Glitches
2 mentions
Performance and Efficiency
2 mentionsA smaller subset of reviewers, 2 of 16, pointed to performance and efficiency gains as a positive impact. These benefit…
A smaller subset of reviewers, 2 of 16, pointed to performance and efficiency gains as a positive impact. These benefits include increased work productivity, faster time to market, and positive feedback from clients.
Please provide some detailed examples of things that BrowserStack does particularly well.
16 answeredThis report synthesizes 16 recent product reviews to identify areas where BrowserStack performs well. Reviewers frequently highlight BrowserStack's capabilities in automation testing, with 7 of 16 reviewers mentioning this feature. This includes the use of frameworks like Cypress and Selenium, as well as automating mobile apps. Cross-browser testing is also noted as a strength, with 4 of 16 reviewers specifically mentioning the ease and reliability it provides. Additionally, 3 of 16 reviewers appreciate the platform's ability to facilitate testing on multiple devices, including both web and mobile platforms. These features collectively contribute to BrowserStack's perceived value in streamlining testing processes across different environments.
Automation Testing
7 mentionsA significant portion of reviewers, 7 out of 16, praise BrowserStack for its automation testing capabilities. Reviewers…
A significant portion of reviewers, 7 out of 16, praise BrowserStack for its automation testing capabilities. Reviewers specifically appreciate the platform's compatibility with frameworks like Cypress and Selenium, which simplifies the automation process. The ability to automate testing across different operating systems and devices is also a key benefit.
Cross-browser testing
4 mentionsCross-browser testing is another area where BrowserStack receives positive feedback, with 4 of 16 reviewers mentioning…
Cross-browser testing is another area where BrowserStack receives positive feedback, with 4 of 16 reviewers mentioning its ease and reliability. This feature allows users to ensure their applications function correctly across various browsers, which streamlines the testing process. Reviewers find it to be a valuable asset in their development workflow.
Testing on multiple devices
3 mentionsBrowserStack's ability to facilitate testing on multiple devices is appreciated by 3 of 16 reviewers. The platform's su…
BrowserStack's ability to facilitate testing on multiple devices is appreciated by 3 of 16 reviewers. The platform's support for various devices, including iOS, Android, MacOS, and Windows, enables comprehensive UI testing. Reviewers also value the ability to perform parallel testing on both web and mobile devices.