Nintex Review Insights

Score7.9 out of 10

493 Reviews and Ratings

Back to Reviews

Insights from Nintex Reviewers

Based on 8 verified reviews published in the last 18 months

Nintex is designed to integrate with other line-of-business systems and applications. What integrations does your organization use?

8 answered

This report synthesizes 8 recent reviews to understand Nintex's integration capabilities with other line-of-business systems and applications. Reviewers most frequently mentioned integrations with SharePoint and various data sources. Two of the 8 reviewers specifically cited SharePoint integration, with one noting its use for managing knowledge content. Another reviewer mentioned exploring SharePoint integration for process mapping reports. Also, 2 of the 8 reviewers highlighted Nintex's ability to connect with different data sources, including SQL, Oracle, SharePoint, and APIs. One reviewer emphasized that the specific integrations used depend on the client's environment and needs, highlighting the importance of understanding the client's current operations.

Data source integrations

2 mentions

Data source integrations were noted by 2 of the 8 reviewers. Reviewers appreciate Nintex's capacity to connect with a r…

Data source integrations were noted by 2 of the 8 reviewers. Reviewers appreciate Nintex's capacity to connect with a range of data sources, such as SQL, Oracle, SharePoint, and APIs. One reviewer highlighted the importance of tailoring integrations to the specific needs and environment of each client.

SharePoint integration

2 mentions

SharePoint integration was mentioned by 2 of the 8 reviewers. One reviewer indicated using it for knowledge content man…

SharePoint integration was mentioned by 2 of the 8 reviewers. One reviewer indicated using it for knowledge content management. Another reviewer expressed interest in leveraging SharePoint integration for process mapping, but noted that this application was still in early stages.

Describe how you use Nintex in your organization. What are the business problems the product addresses and what is the scope of your use case?

8 answered

This report synthesizes 8 recent reviews to understand how organizations use Nintex and the business problems it addresses. A primary use case is workflow automation, mentioned by 7 reviewers, often in conjunction with SharePoint. A smaller subset of reviewers (4) specifically highlighted the use of Nintex for forms and process management, noting improvements in data gathering and reduced errors. The platform is used across various departments, from HR and IT to internal audit.

Workflow automation

7 mentions

Workflow automation is a central application of the Nintex platform, with 7 of 8 reviewers mentioning its use in this c…

Workflow automation is a central application of the Nintex platform, with 7 of 8 reviewers mentioning its use in this capacity. Reviewers appreciate Nintex's ability to customize workflows beyond standard SharePoint capabilities. The platform is utilized for automating tasks and processes related to SharePoint Online.

Forms and processes

4 mentions

Nintex is also used for creating and managing forms and processes, as noted by 4 reviewers. These reviewers emphasize t…

Nintex is also used for creating and managing forms and processes, as noted by 4 reviewers. These reviewers emphasize the platform's ability to streamline data gathering and approval processes, leading to improved efficiency and reduced human error. The forms are used across different departments for various use cases.

Please provide some detailed examples of areas where Nintex has room for improvement.

8 answered

This report analyzes 8 recent product reviews to identify areas where Nintex could improve. A significant area for improvement, noted by 3 of 8 reviewers, lies in the realm of integrations and APIs. These reviewers expressed concerns about the limitations of existing integrations and the need for manual coding to achieve desired connectivity. Additionally, 2 of 8 reviewers raised concerns about Nintex's licensing and cost structure. These reviewers specifically mentioned that the per-process map charging model and the cost per run for workflow cloud automations make Nintex a less attractive option compared to alternatives like Power Automate or UiPath. The small sample size means that these findings should be interpreted as indicators of potential issues, not definitive conclusions about the product's overall performance.

Integration and APIs

3 mentions

A substantial portion of reviewers, specifically 3 out of 8, expressed dissatisfaction with Nintex's integration capabi…

A substantial portion of reviewers, specifically 3 out of 8, expressed dissatisfaction with Nintex's integration capabilities and APIs. The primary concern revolves around the perceived lack of robust, out-of-the-box integrations, which forces users to engage in complex manual coding to connect Nintex with other systems. Reviewers suggest that incorporating more built-in integrations would greatly enhance the product's usability and value.

Licensing and Cost

2 mentions

Cost and licensing concerns were voiced by 2 of 8 reviewers. These reviewers indicated that Nintex's pricing model, par…

Cost and licensing concerns were voiced by 2 of 8 reviewers. These reviewers indicated that Nintex's pricing model, particularly the per-process map charge and per-run cost for cloud automations, makes it a less competitive choice compared to alternative solutions. The cost structure is perceived as prohibitive, especially when compared to options like Power Automate or UiPath.