Sage Fixed Assets Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 8.6 out of 10

Score

8.6 out of 10

Reviews

3 Reviews

Sage Fixed Assets for Accurate Fixed Asset Management

Rating: 10 out of 10

Incentivized

January 24, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We run a full ERP system from another provider. It fulfills most of our needs, however, it lacks a good, fixed asset system. It does not calculate depreciation accurately for our business. We use Sage to track fixed assets and the depreciation on our Fixed Assets and we found that Sage picks up the slack in that area nicely.

Pros

Managing Fixed Assets
Calculating Depreciation
Depreciation Schedule

Cons

Price
Depends on SQL database
Network version limited number of users

Likelihood to Recommend

To me, the best use case for Sage Fixed Assets are: 1. you run a Sage based ERP. or 2. you have an ERP that is limited in its Fixed Asset abilities. We have not done any integration per se, but if we did, it would be fairly easy given the fact that Sage uses SQL tables.

Phillip George

Director of Information Services in Information Technology at Rudd Equipment Company (201-500 employees)

Vetted Review

20 years of experience

Verified on LinkedIn

Sage FAS Flop

Rating: 2 out of 10

Incentivized

November 4, 2021

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Our finance department uses Sage FAS to keep track of inventory and financial assets. We are in the process of transferring our data to another application but still use Sage FAS for our main fixed asset tracker. We have over 200 companies in FAS and about 15 users that use it on a daily basis.

Pros

Fixed asset management

Cons

Adding new users with multiple company access
Copying users

Likelihood to Recommend

I believe that Sage is not suited well for our company because we are too large. To add new users we have to go into all 200+ companies and add their access individually. This is time-consuming and not a good way to manage access.

Adam Gillam

Network Administrator in Information Technology at Titan International (1001-5000 employees)

Vetted Review

4 years of experience

Sage Fixed Assets - it could use a little fixing itself

Rating: 3 out of 10

Incentivized

January 22, 2020

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Sage Fixed Assets to handle the organization, tracking, and depreciation for all of our domestic organizations' fixed assets. Additionally, it is used by our tax department in handling the various, and ever growing, complexities of tax depreciation. It provides a central repository where calculations and transfers may be completed.

Pros

Central Repository.
Staying up to date on tax law changes.

Cons

Non-intuitive to use.
Horrible Excel reports.

Likelihood to Recommend

I'm just not likely to recommend Sage Fixed Assets to another user. I've not used another system before, but I cannot imagine that another system out there could be less user friendly. The reporting system is clunky at best. Additionally, a primary feature of the system is the asset import system that more or less requires an advanced SAGE degree to figure out and use. It's just not intuitive and really is lacking in basic functionality, leaving users to spend copious amounts of time repeating the same processes over and over.

Verified User

Supervisor in Finance and Accounting (5001-10,000 employees)

Vetted Review

7 years of experience

Loading Reviews List....