UserTesting helps UX researchers, designers, product teams, and marketers gather actionable insights through research, testing, and feedback. With a network of real people ready to share their perspectives, UserTesting enables organizations to make customer-first decisions at scale.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Project Manager in Marketing (10,001+ employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
I have used UserTesting on research projects I have been on in the past where I have used this tool to conduct surveys, market research, user interviews and overall insights on a specific brand or product from diverse audiences.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Contributor in Research & Development (201-500 employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Features, new designs, iterative products, etc for people on the Philadelphia area.
Pros
Recruit for individual interviews
Usability testing
Speed on short test recruitment
Cons
Screening for legitimate participants
Pricing on credit system to be more accessible
Survey capabilities
Return on Investment
Less error on release products
Helping us kill not functional products beforehand
Helping estimate potential drop out in a user journey
Usability
Alternatives Considered
User Interviews, Amazing Marvin, User Insight, Fuel Cycle and Sprig
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sr UX Designer in Marketing at Manulife (10,001+ employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use UserTesting to validate our assumptions on a product design. To make better decisions to improve the user experience and enhance our product usability, and to create more user-friendly designs. This process helps us reduce the risk of proposing the wrong product design and increase customer satisfaction by aligning the product more closely with what the user wants and expects.
Pros
Easiness of the Recruitment process.
Easiness of building Questionnaire and Survey.
Great number of features that helps gathering insights.
Cons
I wish there were a better way to export the insights, rather than exporting the data in Excel.
An example would be to have a list of pre-made reports to choose from.
Return on Investment
We can build tests and gather the insights from those tests to validate our products at a breakneck pace.
By quickly validating our assumptions, we can adjust or refine our designs to ensure the final results are more user-focused.
Recently, by testing and comparing two different flows for a form, we were able to create the right solution that gave us better leads compared to the former form. This results in better leads, better data about the user, and better support at the end for this user.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Senior UX Designer in Product Management at Cru (1001-5000 employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
UserTesting is empowering our organization to give users a voice. We are integrating their voice into our strategic priorities and it's helping us shape decisions that affect them. I conduct a variety of tests including persona development interviews, prototyping tests, IA (information architecture) tests like card sorting, or generative research where we just want to talk to users and understand their world.
Pros
Panelist recruitment and diversity of panelists.
Flexible incentive structure.
Breadth of testing modes from simple to complex.
Cons
Navigation and site structure is confusing.
Managing test folders is cumbersome.
Questionable user consent and privacy policies.
Return on Investment
Decreased decision-making time/fatigue for design strategy.
Increased our research throughput.
Catching errors/misunderstanding early in the development cycle.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
User Researcher in Marketing at Sage (5001-10,000 employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Working in marketing, we use UserTesting to help us surface user pain points and feedback that are then fed back to our optimisation squads. The squads pick out these opportunities for testing and we a/b test hypotheses backed by user research which helps drive conversion rates. We also use UserTesting to conduct user research on prototypes to allow us to get early feedback and for designers to iterate on experiences before they've ever even launched on the website.
Pros
Multi-method studies
Visualising results
Centralised repository of research
Cons
AI functionality in UserTesting and EnjoyHQ
Participant quality in UserTesting
Better recruitment numbers for niche profiles
Return on Investment
Increased conversion rate
Research backed experimentation hypotheses
Tracking recurring issues over time
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Userlytics and EnjoyHQ
Other Software Used
Userlytics, EnjoyHQ, Miro
UserTesting Alternatives
Products similar to UserTesting that may also meet your needs.