A2Z Events is an enterprise-level event management solution with a full suite of tools required to manage and market expositions and conferences, including built-in integration with in-house accounting, AMS, CRM and CAD systems. According to the vendor, their clients realize improved productivity in back office processes and increased connectivity with membership, CRM and financial databases. Features include online floor plans, event websites, speaker management, matchmaking tools, and…
N/A
GoTo Webinar
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
GoToWebinar is GoTo’s webinar and online conferencing solution, and offers features like audience polling and Q&A, flexible scheduling experiences, and webinar templates. It offers CRM integrations and reporting & analytics tools to help engage clients’ audiences.
$49
per month per organizer
Pricing
A2Z Events by Personify
GoTo Webinar
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Lite
$49/month
per month per organizer
Standard
$99/month
per month per organizer
Pro
$199/month
per month per organizer
Enterprise
$399/month
per month per organizer
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
A2Z Events by Personify
GoTo Webinar
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
A2Z Events by Personify
GoTo Webinar
Features
A2Z Events by Personify
GoTo Webinar
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
A2Z Events by Personify
-
Ratings
GoTo Webinar
7.1
Ratings
5% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
7.10 Ratings
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
A2Z Events by Personify
-
Ratings
GoTo Webinar
7.6
Ratings
5% below category average
High quality audio
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Mobile support
00 Ratings
7.60 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
A2Z Events by Personify
-
Ratings
GoTo Webinar
7.2
Ratings
11% below category average
Calendar integration
00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Record meetings / events
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Slideshows
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Event registration
00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
A2Z Events by Personify
-
Ratings
GoTo Webinar
8.2
Ratings
1% below category average
Audience polling
00 Ratings
7.90 Ratings
Q&A
00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
A2Z Events by Personify
-
Ratings
GoTo Webinar
7.9
Ratings
4% below category average
Participant roles & permissions
00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Confidential attendee list
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Online Events Marketing
Comparison of Online Events Marketing features of Product A and Product B
I love A2Z. We used to have ExpoCad and I often visit other Website that use ExpoCad and there is no comparison. It is just a clean and easy to use software. It looks crisp and clean - so easy to read.
It is great for big events like training or product demos. It's good for marketing webinars with features like polls and Q&A. It's not ideal for small, casual meetings. It can be too expensive for some businesses. For smaller events, other tools might be better.
Coming from software where I had a huge amount of access to the "backend", it would be nice to be able to manipulate areas of the Exhibit Floorplan a little easier with regard to items like tables, chairs, stages, etc. Maybe add some icons that could be pasted into the floorplan for faster success?
The agenda within A2Z does not give you the ability to host on your own conference site.
The agenda view is sometimes perceived as being too long, there's a lot of extra "white space".
Dashboard for control are mostly intuitive but in some menus like the webcasting section can be cluttered
The current polling and survey capabilities are too simple. More advanced features, such as branching logic and real-time results, would make engagement more dynamic and insightful.
Although it's easy for organiser to use goto webinar, users have reported issues and long wait time on their end and they don't have much control over the session
GoTo Webinar is not boring at all. Its design is extremely intuitive and specific for what its name serves. It is a great software for webinars which have become the trend of "continuous learning". I like the way we can manage participants in the webinars, interacting with them while they cannot disturb the flow of the speech by intruding with the mic.
GoTo Webinar's User Interface is simple and straightforward, which is what I, as an end user, prefer to interact with when I only use a software once or twice a month; I don't want to have to remember extra steps just to attend a webinar.
I rated GoTo Webinar a 9 out of 10 for availability because it generally performs reliably, with minimal application errors or unplanned outages. The platform’s high uptime ensures that it’s usually accessible when needed, supporting a seamless experience for scheduling and conducting webinars. While occasional minor issues may arise, they are infrequent and typically well-managed, contributing to a strong overall rating for availability.
I rated GoTo Webinar an 8 out of 10 for performance due to its generally robust capabilities. Pages load quickly, and reports are generated efficiently, even for complex data sets. The platform’s integration with other systems typically doesn’t introduce significant latency or performance issues. However, during peak usage times or when handling very large data volumes, there can be occasional slowdowns. Despite these instances, GoTo Webinar consistently provides strong performance and reliability in its core functions.
I was always able to get someone on the phone when I needed to. They were very thorough and ensuring my questions were answered. And if I was asking for a solution or request that they didn't offer, they told me so I could at least stop trying to search for it.
I didn't participate in the implementation nor did my company. As far as I know we have an IT office running alla these projects and we just use the final products for our educational purposes. I also didn't notice implementation at any level while using the desktop interface, but would immediately recognize it, if so.
I've used Map Your Show, as well as ExpoCad. Each has their own redeeming qualities, and the success of A2Z is also based on the support you receive from the provider. Customer Support and being assigned to one support team player from A2Z has been huge and we have greatly appreciated it.
Zoom scores well above GoTo and ON24 in brand recognition across mid to large enterprises. But GoTo scores well in SMBs. Regarding value for money and ROI, it's better than ON24. We selected GoTo because of the price point and to ensure that our partner-sourced SMB stacks do not end up not engaging with us because of a lack of a proper medium.
I rated GoTo Webinar an 8 out of 10 for scalability because it effectively supports deployment across multiple departments and sites with its flexible features. It allows for easy management of large-scale webinars and integration with various systems, accommodating a growing number of users and sessions. However, some users might find limitations in advanced customization or specific integration needs as their requirements become more complex. Overall, its robust capabilities and adaptability make it a strong choice for scalable webinar solutions.
Positive - it provides one place from which primary players in the conference could pull information. A2Z maintains consistency and lowers the discrepancy issue when everyone tries to keep their own little database.
Good: We've been able to keep various client teams trained up on our product
Good: It helps us automate communication about the webinars, as well as follow-ups
Bad: There is a time suck that shouldn't exist surrounding the recurring scheduler which needs to be rethought and retooled with more than the most basic real world use cases in mind