Action1 is an autonomous endpoint management platform that is cloud-native, scalable, and configurable in 5 minutes. It is free for the first 200 endpoints, with no functional limits. By pioneering autonomous OS and third-party patching - AEM’s foundational use case - through peer-to-peer patch distribution and real-time vulnerability assessment without needing a VPN, it eliminates costly, time-consuming routine labor, preempts ransomware and security risks, and protects the digital…
N/A
RemoteCall PC/Mobile/Visual
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
RemoteCall is a cloud based remote support solution bridging the agents and clients. Support client PCs, mobile devices and via camera using the cloud based service or in-house server solution. It is a solution for IT professionals and it can be used from PCs, mobile devices, websites and apps with 100% RSUPPORTs remote service technology. The vendor's flagship products, RemoteCall WebViewer boasts users among all types of companies, governments, public institutions, manufacturers, as well as…
$30
per installation
Pricing
Action1
RemoteCall PC/Mobile/Visual
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
RemoteCall Server
30k+ USD
per installation
RemoteCall PC
59.90 / month
per seat
RemoteCall PC + visual
74.90 / month
per seat
RemoteCall PC + mobile
79.90 / month
per seat
RemoteCall PC + mobile + visual
129.90 / month
per seat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Action1
RemoteCall PC/Mobile/Visual
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
** RemoteCall Server pricing is calculated as [one-time server software fee] + [one-time per device license fee] + [optional yearly maintenance]
** SaaS plan's device can be Windows / Mac PC or Android / iOS mobile devices.
To be honest, I might have been lucky, but Action1 was the first I actually tested. I've heard from our mother company from Italy, that they have tested NinjaOne but it was not what they were expecting in terms of vulnerability and patch management. I've recently suggested them …
GFI Languard was pretty nice, but that was ages ago. I do pay for PDQ deploy and inventory though and am happy with that software...however, while its feature set does overlap with Action1, it is not just another flavor of the same thing, so I find that I use both of them.
Action1 excels with patch management and their ability to show if applications have been marked as vulnerable. It is also hard to beat their free model where the first 200 are free. When I first started with Action1 it was only 50 endpoints so seeing that expand so much is …
From a functionality point of view the platforms are very similar, when we worked with NinjaOne they tried the hard push for us to onboard our entire organization. We didn't want that and they refused to scale down to the requirements of our small satellite office (<10 …
For the amount of functionality you get with the cost, no other product compared to Action1 did. The free trial and free endpoints they offer help prove there is no time trial to rush and select a product. The support has been fantastic with the company as well as the Action1 …
Action1 is a similar but less feature-filled product than ConnectWise or Kaseya. However, Action1 can fulfill the main use-case scenarios of both products at a much lower cost per endpoint. Action1 is also constantly innovating and working with its users to improve upon the …
Price for one. The cost is extremely reasonable IMO. Action1 is easier to use for a non-technical person and there is zero maintenance since it is cloud hosted.
After looking at different solutions, Action1 [Cloud Remote Monitoring and Management Solution] was the perfect fit for us that delivered all of the features we wanted without being as costly as some of the others alternatives we've looked at. There was no minimum endpoint …
Action1 Cloud Remote Monitoring and Management Solution may not be as feature rich as SCCM and Intune, but it does its job without having to set up and support additional infrastructure on your network. It's more user friendly than ManageEngine's Desktop Central but does most …
RemoteCall and Teamviewer are both good products. However, technical support for Teamviewer is difficult. When a problem occurred, it did not respond immediately and took a long time and it took too much time and money to customize it for the company. On the other hand, …
For small teams having to deal with significant ammount of devices, I can't express how useful Action1 is. With very small effort, you can easily keep track of your devices, keep them up to date, deploy new software to your users, create recurring reports/alerts and so on. Initially, the 100 endpoints for free was also a nice touch. Now, even better since they increased to 200. For the forseeable future, I have not to worry about costs and still can't believe it's a full solution for free, not those freeware stuff where what you really desire is behind a cost.
There was an engineer call due to an emergency failure at the customer. It took an hour for the engineer to move and get to the site. So, using RemoteCall, I immediately supported the problem while moving. The customer's problems were resolved before arriving on-site, and the customer was satisfied thanks to the quick handling and response. Without RemoteCall, the golden hour would have been missed.
Lots of times Action1 will identify a program that needs to be patched, but then not really have a path laid out to get that done...so they just remain as they are, but are tagged as such.
Really wants to replace the windows update mechanism. Resists (or did at least) you if you try to keep updates as they are and update occasionally from Action1
Could develop the scripts section a bit more, looked pretty sparse last time I checked it out.
Agent deployment is simple (and silent) - once that is done, you're good to go. Everything is simple, centralized and very easy to work with. There isn't one aspect of this platform that requires crawling over forums and Google, it just works!
After looking at different solutions, Action1 [Cloud Remote Monitoring and Management Solution] was the perfect fit for us that delivered all of the features we wanted without being as costly as some of the others alternatives we've looked at. There was no minimum endpoint count and they even offer up to 50 endpoints for free, which is really great for a small organization like us to help us lower our starting costs and still allows us to grow at our pace without having to commit to a defined amount of endpoints to start.
RemoteCall and TeamViewer are both good products. However, technical support for TeamViewer is difficult. When a problem occurred, it did not respond immediately and took a long time and it took too much time and money to customize it for the company. On the other hand, RemoteCall provided various services at a low cost. In particular, it was customized to satisfy 100% of our requirements with a demanding customer.RemoteCall is the best value for money.
Saved hours per week on patching and able to ensure a 100% patching success rate.
Able to create custom alerting on potential problems as well as able to create some automation to automatically address problems.
Improved support to our remote locations and users.
Custom deployments allow us to have a mechanism to deploy custom applications we build as well as other third party applications we need to distribute.