ActiveBatch Workload Automation vs. Okta Workflows

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
ActiveBatch from Advanced Systems Concepts in New Jersey is IT workload automation software.N/A
Okta Workflows
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Azuqua was a tool that helped users integrate their SaaS applications and build custom automations. It was acquired by Okta in late 2019, and is now part of Okta Workflows. Okta Workflows leverages Azuqua’s workflow orchestration engine and application integrations to automate complex identity-centric processes such as user onboarding and offboarding. The product is available as part of the Okta Lifecycle Management…N/A
Pricing
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationOkta Workflows
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationOkta Workflows
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationOkta Workflows
Considered Both Products
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
In our organization we need to schedule job quite frequently and it was difficult to manage as we were doing it manually, thanks to ActiveBatch Workload Automation this feature has been automated and no manual intervention is required, which has resulted in less errors.With the …
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch has improved the workload automation and job scheduling than ever before without a need of an external resource.
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
The workload automation solution is based on the specific needs of an organization, as well as the features, capabilities, and costs of various solutions. A thorough evaluation process and consideration of these factors can help ensure the selection of a solution that aligns …
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
It almost works everything good compares to other software, in terms of set up, in terms of cost, in terms of end number of options which is required for any organization you workuseful in planning your daily activities, providing the purchase order for raw materials, track the …
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
A well-known and established workload automation system with a solid track record for scalability and dependability is Control-M. However, many users note that Control-M is more sophisticated and takes longer to develop than ActiveBatch, which is frequently commended for its …
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Users may manage and automate IT activities across many systems and applications using the complete task scheduling and automation platform known as ActiveBatch Workload Automation. It supports several different technologies, such as Windows, UNIX/Linux, Oracle, SAP, and many …
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
I have used other products but I do not have the level of experience with them as I do Active Batch.
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
I only have used this software, so I can't judge other software. I wasn't involved in decision making.
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
We looked at several other workload automation solutions and hands down we all looked at each other after seeing the demo and we all understood the genius of the application. To be honest we were all stunned and talked about it for weeks afterward. It didn't even compare to the …
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
I was not involved in the evaluation/purchase decision of ActiveBatch as that decision was made at our VP level. So I cannot comment on other product comparison.
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
During initial selection, we compared ActiveBatch with simple schedulers like Task Manager and cron, as well as VisualCron and JAMS. ActiveBatch had the widest range of triggers and the best scheduler/calendar system, and the most comprehensive list of easily-available actions.

W…
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Control-M seems to be a more mature product with a cleaner user interface, however, ActiveBatch has the same functionality.
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
N/A - It was already in place when I was on the scene, but like I said earlier it is much more powerful than SQL Server Agent and probably anything we would've come up with from scratch using .Net. However if your needs are small and traffic is light, then maybe SQL Server …
Okta Workflows
Chose Okta Workflows
I think Okta is so much more complete and FUB is more only sales oriented instead of Customer Service, with Okta you can call, chat, get in contact internally with other departments, and do different things to solve customer issue.
Chose Okta Workflows
We have not used other products similar to Okta.
Chose Okta Workflows
I evaluated Zapier and Microsoft Flow before coming across Azuqua. Zapier was too simplistic and didn't allow for transfer of enough variables. The price point also didn't work for the value it could provide. Microsoft Flow couldn't make the connection with Smartsheet, and I …
Chose Okta Workflows
Stampley - on the surface they look similar, but I came across this alternative after integrating with Azuqua so I haven't fully evaluated it against Azuqua.
Chose Okta Workflows
None, Azuqua seemed to do what we needed.
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua handles multi-stream processes very well, however provides some nuances with connecting data.
Chose Okta Workflows
Zapier primarily, I prefer the workflow creation in Azuqua. The UI is very user friendly.
Chose Okta Workflows
I have used Mulesoft, Workato, my own code and in past years heavyweight data (e.g. ETL) platforms along with a number of bus technologies. In this case, I was looking for the cloud-based approach that matches our strategy of being totally cloud-focused along with simpler …
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua was the first application we assessed for our purposes, and served our needs so well that we felt no need to search further. It gave us the solutions we needed in a way that was easy to set up and maintain, and the support we received was above and beyond expectations, …
Chose Okta Workflows
I had to use the Automate tool for funneling image assets in bulk (tens of thousands) from FTPs into various destinations on an eCommerce platform. The user interface was quite harsh in comparison to Azuqua. Far more text/code line driven.
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua offered the most customization of the other platforms we tried. While it was comparably intuitive to use, in terms of entry level, Azuqua maintained this intuitiveness at higher levels of sophistication/integration whereas the other platforms either lacked the same logic …
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua was more intuitive.
Chose Okta Workflows
IFTTT / Zapier - There really isn't a comparison as Azuqua allows for full customization of your flows and IFTTT and Zapier do not.

Talend Open Studio is built more for doing database / file integrations and it can do API calls. Talend is much bigger but cannot accomplish what …
Chose Okta Workflows
We have not used another tool besides Azuqua to help us solve these business needs.
Chose Okta Workflows
Smartsheet notifications is the main competitor for what we use Azuqua for. When we got Azuqua, there was no competitor and Smartsheet actually recommended it as the solution. Now, we split up the work between the 2 tools and use Smartsheet for the easier notifications and …
Chose Okta Workflows
Easy to build out complex if/then scenarios and fire of multiple other workflows within one workflow. Like the UI of seeing how data is being utilizes, ported, and manipulated across the workflows. Also like the workflow history for optimization as well as troubleshooting. Raw …
Chose Okta Workflows
I evaluated another platform, but I can't recall their name.

ServiceRocket didn't work. I tried to integrate with them, but it was a mess and a waste of time. The other platform was 10x as expensive at Azuqua.
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua was the only product we looked at in this space.
Features
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationOkta Workflows
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
9.6
Ratings
15% above category average
Okta Workflows
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationOkta Workflows
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationOkta Workflows
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationOkta Workflows
Likelihood to Recommend
Any large business or organisation that wants to manage their workload effectively and with the least amount of room for error might choose the ActiveBatch Automation tool. Being a consultant I feel that It aids in task automation and has the flexibility to change in response to varying company requirements. It helps to save huge time by doing all the repetitive tasks on daily basis. During the patching activity the schedulers can be stopped. It also help by alerting us if any system/job is down so that SLA can be saved. Overall ActiveBatch Automation stands as a dependable cornerstone for ensuring the seamless operation of our tasks.
Read full review
The integration I used Azuqua for was based on Salesforce, Wrike and Office 365. I found the integration of Salesforce reasonably straightforward, Wrike was limited in the "cards" capability but functional (there are bugs but there are also workarounds but they required assistance from the Azuqua support team) and Office 365 was quite immature (primarily around Excel bugs but also email was limited).
Read full review
Pros
  • Makes scheduling easy to understand, follow, and rerun jobs when necessary.
  • Allows for cross-team coordination of scheduled tasks which reduces errors.
  • Makes stopping jobs easy when needed for server/database downtime.
  • Scripting enables us to easily change email addresses for failed job alerts.
  • Nested plans/jobs make creating and changing dependencies simple.
Read full review
  • The best part about Azuqua is that you do not need to write code. You do however need to have an understanding of logic and how the software works. This happens to fit me perfectly as someone with basic programming experience.
  • Their Support is second to none. Not only are they extremely quick and responsive, but their answers are never canned responses and always provide valuable content.
  • They seem to take feedback seriously and will continue to evolve and make a better product.
Read full review
Cons
  • String handling / parsing. I find myself using PowerShell to do a fair amount of text parsing (particularly if manipulations are needed) - not necessarily a bad thing, but certainly a place where ActiveBatch could be improved.
  • Debugging - or lack of it! With no stepping debugger, it can be a longer process than many other programming / scripting environments: rather than simply stepping through and observing state changes, I find myself inserting logging steps to excess, then having to clean them up once the error is found.
  • The perennial - Documentation! While a near-universal complaint for *any* software, ActiveBatch's developer documentation is somewhat spotty - just where I need detail, I find summary-level info. There is lots of documentation (as there should be for a tool with such a wide range of applications), but it is in mixed formats (some PDF, some CHM), and the descriptions of specific fields within job steps is often little more than I can get in a tool-tip in the GUI. Allowable ranges, expected formats for string data, and similar helpful details are inconsistent.
  • The KnowledgeBase at ASCI's web site often has examples which answer the questions I have, but not always - and not always under the search terms one would think to use.
Read full review
  • I think it requires an easy way to migrate flows created from one user to then move the ownership to another user. It happened to us that one of our engineers left the company and he had the Azuqua account and flows. It required quite some time, cases and telephone calls to do the migration to my account.
Read full review
Usability
We can easily add new plans/jobs in our batch schedules. Also, coordination with reporting and QA jobs is simple to do. Building schedules, restarting jobs, triggering dependencies is easy to understand. The system is very stable and allows us to easily see overall processing times.
Read full review
The system is working as it should, keeping our programs safe from outside hackers. Helping us keep our passwords safe, convenient and already ready to get us logged into the program securely and quickly. Verification that only authorized users are able to access our company's programs. Okta Workflows (Azuqua) is a very good system that has helped our company greatly.
Read full review
Support Rating
My colleague contacted them directly, I only know hearsay on this but it was not good.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The workload automation solution is based on the specific needs of an organization, as well as the features, capabilities, and costs of various solutions. A thorough evaluation process and consideration of these factors can help ensure the selection of a solution that aligns with overall business objectives and meets the specific needs of the organization.
Read full review
I evaluated Zapier and Microsoft Flow before coming across Azuqua. Zapier was too simplistic and didn't allow for transfer of enough variables. The price point also didn't work for the value it could provide. Microsoft Flow couldn't make the connection with Smartsheet, and I was unable to get Microsoft support or Smartsheet support to assist me with the issue.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • ActiveBatch can automate intricate procedures and minimise manual involvement, which can boost an organization's production and efficiency.
  • Organisations can save money by using ActiveBatch to automate operations, which lowers the expenses of manual labour and potential mistakes.
  • Implementing ActiveBatch could come with hefty up-front expenses including licencing, instruction, and consultancy fees, which could have a short-term negative impact on ROI.
Read full review
  • Increased time savings. We could not function as a matter of daily business if we did not have a tool to automate project folders (and complementary workflow management profiles) for the thousands of projects that flow through daily.
  • Opens up a greater understanding of all the silos and divisions within the company infrastructure and tests secure means to link those groups safely and share information.
  • Opens up the chance to communicate with other API information sources if our company is doing a partnership with another organization. Granted everything is square with IT security.
Read full review
ScreenShots