| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Acumatica | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | Acumatica delivers a set of cloud-based business software applications with dashboards, reporting tools, integrated document management, centralized security, and customization tools. | $1,000 per year |
| Acumatica | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | Pricing is always consumption-based with no five-year lock-ins or termination penalties. The Acumatica ERP pricing structure allows adding casual users, suppliers, and customers without paying for additional licenses. The cost is based on the features and resources utilized, not on the number of users who access the system. An Acumatica partner works with users to understand specific requirements, determine the proper resources and modules for the company, and presents a price for the license. | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Acumatica | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Acumatica The basic difference between Acumatica and similar solutions is their complexity and usability. It is less complex and easier to learn, and it is also based on a low-code platform, which makes it more convenient for the end user. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Acumatica I was not involved in the selection process. I came on board with Westminster after the selection had already been made, and they realized that they needed somebody who could help them bridge the learning of Acumatica with the teaching of Acumatica, and so that's why I do what … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Acumatica We used to use a company called CMIC that we used for five years, which was another ERP system that kind of was an all-in-one system that was designed specifically for the construction industry. When you deal with an all-in-one system, you don't get quite the level of … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Acumatica It's almost the same. The only difference is that Acumatica has better functionality. Even though it's by Oracle, it has less functionality, and Acumatica is a bit cheaper than NetSuite. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Acumatica We moved from MAS 90/Sage to Acumatica to increase our reporting possibilities and do less work outside of the system to increase efficiency and reporting. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Acumatica availability of select isv Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Acumatica | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll Management |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Customization |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Security |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Reporting & Analytics |
| ||||||||||||||||
| General Ledger and Configurable Accounting |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Inventory Management |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Order Management |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Subledger and Financial Process |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Project Financial Management |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Project Execution Management |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Grants Management |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Procurement |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Risk Management |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Logistics |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Manufacturing |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Supply Chain |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Product Lifecycle Management |
|
