Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Acumatica
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Acumatica delivers a set of cloud-based business software applications with dashboards, reporting tools, integrated document management, centralized security, and customization tools.N/A
Ridder iQ
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Ridder iQ is a manufacturing ERP, from ECI Software Solutions. Ridder iQ includes customer relationship management functionality that is fully integrated, and includes an integration with Outlook for email.N/A
Pricing
AcumaticaRidder iQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AcumaticaRidder iQ
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing is always consumption-based with no five-year lock-ins or termination penalties. The Acumatica ERP pricing structure allows adding casual users, suppliers, and customers without paying for additional licenses. The cost is based on the features and resources utilized, not on the number of users who access the system. An Acumatica partner works with users to understand specific requirements, determine the proper resources and modules for the company, and presents a price for the license.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AcumaticaRidder iQ
Considered Both Products
Acumatica
Chose Acumatica
We evaluated many potential solutions, but Acumatica was one of the few that could do rental management, and support cash-based reporting from a financial standpoint.
Chose Acumatica
Acumatica is just a piece of the puzzle. We use it alongside Wrike.
Chose Acumatica
Acumatica ERP is the next step up from individual systems such as quickbooks for finance/accounting and salesforce for CRM.
Chose Acumatica
The basic difference between Acumatica and similar solutions is their complexity and usability. It is less complex and easier to learn, and it is also based on a low-code platform, which makes it more convenient for the end user.
Chose Acumatica
User-friendly, updated, add-on module options.
Chose Acumatica
I was not involved in the selection process. I came on board with Westminster after the selection had already been made, and they realized that they needed somebody who could help them bridge the learning of Acumatica with the teaching of Acumatica, and so that's why I do what …
Chose Acumatica
We used to use a company called CMIC that we used for five years, which was another ERP system that kind of was an all-in-one system that was designed specifically for the construction industry. When you deal with an all-in-one system, you don't get quite the level of …
Chose Acumatica
It's almost the same. The only difference is that Acumatica has better functionality. Even though it's by Oracle, it has less functionality, and Acumatica is a bit cheaper than NetSuite.
Chose Acumatica
Acumatica is more flexible than NetSuite and tailors itself more to the need of the user and fostering innovation. The pricing model of Acumatica was also more attractive than NetSuite in my opinion. My experience with IFS was positive, but with Acumatica being a cloud-first …
Chose Acumatica
We selected Acumatica based on our requirements that we had laid out to the various providers and ERPs we were investigating.
Chose Acumatica
Odoo, NetSuite ERP and QuickBooks Desktop Enterprise
Chose Acumatica
We moved from MAS 90/Sage to Acumatica to increase our reporting possibilities and do less work outside of the system to increase efficiency and reporting.
Chose Acumatica
NetSuite ERP and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Field Service (FieldOne)
Chose Acumatica
The ease of customization and the network of integrate-able ISV’s really stood out to us over the competitive products.
Chose Acumatica
SAP Concur, NetSuite ERP and Oracle PeopleSoft ERP
Chose Acumatica
Acumatica was it right out of the gate
Ridder iQ
Chose Ridder iQ
Ridder IQ is a system for production facilities. It is a good tool. However, there are not enough possibilities for CRM, finance, and MRP planning. At our company, we use Ridder as the main ERP package, and we do need further functionality in CRM and visibility in MRP planning.
Chose Ridder iQ
Ridder iQ is more suited for a company which operates in a production environment.

Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is meer geschikt voor een bedrijf dat in een productieomgeving werkt.
Chose Ridder iQ
Odoo has broader functionality but its functionality is not deeper. The PLM functionality of Odoo is not really CAD PLM but only BOM management. Ridder iQ is very easy in small customizations and bigger customization is also possible but with programming. Ridder iQ has a good …
Chose Ridder iQ
We use scansys for automating the invoices and this works great.

Dutch Translation: Wij gebruiken Scansys om de facturen te automatiseren en dit werkt geweldig.
Chose Ridder iQ
CASH was only financial system and was repurposed as planning for us. But lacks alot of functionality Ridder iQ gives us now.

Dutch Translation: CASH was oorspronkelijk een financieel systeem en werd voor ons omgebouwd tot planningssysteem. Maar het mist veel van de …
Chose Ridder iQ
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like …
Chose Ridder iQ
I used unit4 in a previous organization, this system has far fewer options and I don't think it was suitable for Biron.

Dutch Translation: Ik heb Unit4 gebruikt in een vorige organisatie, dit systeem heeft veel minder opties en ik denk niet dat het geschikt was voor Biron
Chose Ridder iQ
Ridder iQ has better inventory module than Exact Globe+

Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ heeft een betere inventarismodule dan Exact Globe+
Chose Ridder iQ
Ridder iQ is good for small to midsize companies. The cost are way better than other ERP.

Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is geschikt voor kleine tot middelgrote bedrijven. De kosten zijn veel gunstiger dan bij andere ERP-systemen.
Chose Ridder iQ
Ridder iQ was a better fit for our (production) company than Microsoft Dynamics.

Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ paste beter bij ons (productie)bedrijf dan Microsoft Dynamics.
Features
AcumaticaRidder iQ
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
7.1
Ratings
1% below category average
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Pay calculation5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration4.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Ridder iQ
6.0
Ratings
23% below category average
API for custom integration8.10 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Plug-ins7.90 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
8.1
Ratings
1% below category average
Ridder iQ
7.9
Ratings
3% below category average
Single sign-on capability8.50 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.80 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
7.7
Ratings
6% above category average
Ridder iQ
7.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Dashboards7.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Standard reports7.20 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Custom reports7.80 Ratings8.40 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
8.6
Ratings
11% above category average
Ridder iQ
6.4
Ratings
19% below category average
Accounts payable8.40 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Accounts receivable8.50 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Global Financial Support7.70 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.20 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.90 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Standardized Processes8.40 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
8.1
Ratings
3% above category average
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Inventory tracking8.10 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Automatic reordering7.20 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Location management7.80 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
8.3
Ratings
5% above category average
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Pricing7.50 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Order entry8.10 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Credit card processing7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.40 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.50 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
8.6
Ratings
14% above category average
Ridder iQ
5.7
Ratings
27% below category average
Billing Management7.80 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management8.00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.40 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.70 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Period Close8.50 Ratings5.60 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
9.9
Ratings
26% above category average
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
7.3
Ratings
7% above category average
Ridder iQ
5.5
Ratings
21% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling5.70 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers6.50 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools6.60 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
7.8
Ratings
5% above category average
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
7.2
Ratings
4% above category average
Ridder iQ
5.2
Ratings
29% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared7.00 Ratings4.90 Ratings
Contract Authoring6.50 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated7.60 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Supplier Management7.10 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings4.20 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
6.9
Ratings
6% above category average
Ridder iQ
4.8
Ratings
30% below category average
Risk Repository7.00 Ratings4.50 Ratings
Control Management7.10 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments7.30 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Issue Detection6.60 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Remediation and Certification6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
8.5
Ratings
24% above category average
Ridder iQ
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.70 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management6.30 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Fulfillment Management7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
8.6
Ratings
15% above category average
Ridder iQ
7.6
Ratings
2% above category average
Production Process Design7.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Production Management8.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Configuration Management7.40 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Work Execution7.40 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs8.10 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
7.7
Ratings
8% above category average
Ridder iQ
6.2
Ratings
14% below category average
Forecasting6.70 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Inventory Planning6.80 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Performance Monitoring7.40 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Acumatica
8.2
Ratings
14% above category average
Ridder iQ
6.1
Ratings
16% below category average
Proposal Management6.80 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Product Master Data Management7.20 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AcumaticaRidder iQ
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AcumaticaRidder iQ
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.4
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.9
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.2
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
7.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.8
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
5.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
5.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AcumaticaRidder iQ
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited because it appears to have been designed to work across multiple industries, and we've kind of seen that it works well for the construction industry. Still, we've been here at the Acumatica Summit and have seen a lot of other industries being able to use the same product, so they have designed it well.
Read full review
The best in the complete production process. It provides the correct info in a very usable way. It is pretty good in sales, but the lack of discounts for sales goods and sales production is not ideal. On the other hand, ECI provides an excellent service for looking for custom solutions where we need them. Dutch Translation: De beste in het complete productieproces. Het biedt de juiste informatie op een zeer bruikbare manier. Het is redelijk goed in de verkoop, maar het gebrek aan kortingen op verkoopartikelen en verkoopproductie is niet ideaal. Aan de andere kant biedt ECI een uitstekende service bij het zoeken naar maatwerkoplossingen waar we die nodig hebben. This review was originally written in English and has been translated into Dutch using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
Read full review
Pros
  • Banking reconciliation: Quick, easy to understand and easy to follow to see where you left off
  • Clearly displaying just enough data to answer questions without forcing us to work through copious amounts of detail or extracting data into other programs to get answers
  • Billing and payment receipt is particularly helpful in the way that the data transfers into the banking section and is exported
Read full review
  • Flexibility in setting budgets for specific parts of a project
  • Insight in costs (journaldetails)(bookkeeping, however not Ridder financials)
  • Sending out offers and order confirmation
  • sending out purchase orders
  • Flexibiliteit bij het vaststellen van budgetten voor specifieke onderdelen van een project
  • Inzicht in kosten (journaalgegevens) (boekhouding, echter geen Ridder financials)
  • Het versturen van offertes en orderbevestigingen
  • het versturen van inkooporders
Read full review
Cons
  • Remittance advices don't work.
  • NACHA file to bank doesn't include vendor reference # which is the vendor invoice number.
  • You can't do offsets between AR & AP when vendors are also customers to net the balances due to/from if agreed upon with the vendor/customer.
Read full review
  • The ability to copy item lines from receipts to a BOM
  • Adding photos to comment blocks in quotes makes the system slow. The photos are added in full size instead of asking for a small version.
  • De mogelijkheid om artikelregels van ontvangsten naar een stuklijst te kopiëren
  • Het toevoegen van foto's aan commentaarblokken tussen aanhalingstekens maakt het systeem traag. De foto's worden op volledige grootte toegevoegd in plaats van dat er om een ​​kleine versie wordt gevraagd.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Because Acumatica keeps updating every year and adapting to all the changes especially with AI capabilities, User interface, interactive assistant and many more. Not only that, there are so many ISVs and VARs that support and integrate with Acumatica that provides you alot of options to innovate your business needs.
Read full review
Its nice software but it is very, very slow in webification and integration possibilities by using api's. Untill now the programm has client-server technology unfortunately. And there are far too less no code adjustments possible.
Read full review
Usability
I would give this rating because Accumatica is super easy to use. When I on boarded to work it was so easy to move through the various screens. In no time I was able to perform my daily required tasks with ease
Read full review
Ridder iQ is friendly to use. With the use of roles we can give a very good user experience to our employees; they are more in control of their tasks. Since we use Ridder iQ, the right information is available for everybody in our organization, all on demand. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gebruiksvriendelijk. Door rollen te gebruiken, kunnen we onze medewerkers een zeer goede gebruikerservaring bieden; ze hebben meer controle over hun taken. Sinds we Ridder iQ gebruiken, is de juiste informatie voor iedereen binnen onze organisatie beschikbaar, direct beschikbaar.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
It's always available.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
there have been some performance issues
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
We used Acumatica Support directly for the first year or so. Overall it's pretty good, but sometimes the support staff wasn't educated on the customizations we had, nor was I as the Customer as I couldn't remember which things were customized and which things were out of the box, so when there was an error, there were some misunderstandings.
Read full review
Expert level of the support engineers is adequate. However in our opinion it does take a fair amount of time to respond
Read full review
In-Person Training
It was on General Inquiries and it's just a complex topic.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Most of the trainers are amazing, but there were a couple who simply read the training guide
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
I'd say the partner selection is critically important. I think the software is very easy to implement. It's very customizable to your business. Finding a partner that will work with you to understand your business and your needs is the critical piece to make sure that the system goes along with it.
Read full review
I didn't work here yet at the time of the implementation
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The basic difference between Acumatica and similar solutions is their complexity and usability. It is less complex and easier to learn, and it is also based on a low-code platform, which makes it more convenient for the end user.
Read full review
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like ISAH. Therefore, the choice was an easy one, because knowledge and customizability are important criteria. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gespecialiseerd in onze branche en heeft mensen met veel kennis in huis. Ridder iQ is daarom veel geschikter dan een ERP-oplossing, die niet gespecialiseerd is in de maakindustrie. Bovendien onderscheidt Ridder iQ zich qua aanpasbaarheid ten opzichte van oplossingen zoals ISAH. De keuze was dan ook snel gemaakt, want kennis en aanpasbaarheid zijn belangrijke criteria.
Read full review
Scalability
From my understanding, the P.O. module is not very robust, at least the last time I inquired about it. At the time, it had a one-to-one match, with one invoice for one P.O. and that isn't practical for many businesses. I don't believe it would be an easy system to use for sending out invoices, if we had thousands of retail utility customers. We do a small number of invoices because we sell wholesale power, not retail, so we only Invoice the municipality. Not each utility customer.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • We were able to work in one system with customizations we needed in inventory and add all our grants in the same system
  • Direct mail invoices was moved to an automated PO system saving time and allowing better financial tracking
  • The grant module can be cumbersome requiring flip flopping to program partners etc during set up
Read full review
  • Implement the business rules and forces them to be applied
  • SDK is used 90% for managing all order inputs and product BOM
  • The software tends to come to an halt for changes for on premise which is required of you have software/machines communicating to/from the ERP
  • Implementeer de bedrijfsregels en zorg ervoor dat ze worden toegepast
  • SDK wordt voor 90% gebruikt voor het beheren van alle orderinputs en product-BOM
  • De software loopt vaak vast bij wijzigingen voor on-premises, wat vereist dat u software/machines hebt die met het ERP communiceren
Read full review
ScreenShots

Acumatica Screenshots

Screenshot of Acumatica Cloud ERP - Field Service DashboardScreenshot of Acumatica Cloud ERP - Manufacturing - Production Manager DashboardScreenshot of Acumatica Cloud ERP - Distribution - Warehouse Operations DashboardsScreenshot of Acumatica Cloud ERP - Construction - Job Cost Accounting DashboardScreenshot of Acumatica Cloud ERP - Retail Edition DashboardsScreenshot of Acumatica Cloud ERP - Professional Services - Financial Management Dashboard

Ridder iQ Screenshots

Screenshot of Ridder IQ combines the knowledge and practical experience gained since 1982 and is built on the latest software techniques such as .NET, C# and Microsoft SQL.Screenshot of Ridder IQ includes a complete CRM system with integration to Exchange and Outlook, purchase, sales, stock and time administration, as well as document management systems, integrated report designer and an authorization system.