Adobe Test and Target is an A/B, multi-variate testing platform which Adobe acquired as part of the Omniture platform in 2009. It is now part of the Adobe Marketing Cloud. It offers tight integration with Adobe analytics and content management products.
N/A
Miso
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pricing
Adobe Target
Miso
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Target
Miso
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Target
Miso
Features
Adobe Target
Miso
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Target
8.6
Ratings
5% above category average
Miso
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Target
8.5
Ratings
0% below category average
Miso
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
We recommend this application because it allows us to segment and track the traffic of our domain under an analysis of their behavior, ranging from counting the number of clicks they make on a single element to the most complete action within our page in real time.
There should be some more clarity around what makes a test significant. While this can be decided by the client themselves, some direction from the tool would be helpful.
Also, if there was an easier way to organize campaigns and search for them it would be helpful. Right now there is just a long list of campaigns and you have to rely on search to find a specific campaign. What if you don't know the name of the test?
Once you get started with your testing program, you realize that it is necessary to continue. You must keep optimizing in order to remain a vital competitor in today's marketing world. Even if you're not using Test & Target or any other user experience testing software, you ought to be performing comparison tests on your own, simply by routing your audience to different experiences and quantifying the aggregate of the results.
The recent UI update is a complete mess. It is difficult to navigate and find features that previously existed. The reactiveness of the page depending on window size is also ridiculous and it is absurd that depending on how large your window is, entire columns of functions will disappear with no indication that they are missing. The usability of the tool has fallen off a cliff.
On several occasions, we have had the need to ask for help from the Adobe Target support team, and I must say that they have provided us with an excellent experience, as they take care of solving the problems quickly and with high precision
The instructor that came to train us was awesome and this training was very useful. I would recommend it for anyone who is going to be using this software. I only mark it lower because it is an added expense to an already expensive product, and a lot of the training covered the "Target" portion of the software (which again, we didn't use)
The training was very easy to understand, however it would have been more useful to my development team than me. It was also primarily over-the-phone, which is never as easy to follow as in-person. We ended up scheduling and paying for an in-person training session to supplement the online/phone training because it wasn't helpful enough.
Implement using a global mBox on the page so you can change any and everything over the traditional method. Traditional method is good if you do not have technical web dev resources, do not know Javascript/jQuery, or you have money to blow on mBox calls. Global deployment reduces mBox calls and allows you to touch many parts of the page easily. A lot more customizable
For us, the decision was very straightforward. We chose to invest in the Adobe stack and utilize tools that are developed to integrate together and complement each other. Ex: Adobe Target 'A4T' integration within Adobe Analytics. Optimizely appears to be a great tool, but for us aligning with the Adobe suite, ensuring that future product enhancements and tools would work well together was a very important key factor in our decision
This is something we've been working to improve on, as far as how we're calculating and tracking this, but Target has had a substantial ROI on our business.
I will say specific to our efforts, we could have probably done similar work if not the same work using a different testing tool (Optimizely for example), but Target has been good for us.