ADSS Signing Server vs. Conga Sign

It is well-suited for most of the clients which have trust in digital signatures and want to reduce the turnaround, but there are still some clients which do not prefer digital signatures and prefer printed agreements with wet signatures. Conga uses the latest digital signing legal regulations so this is a customer-to-customer issue.

Incentivized

• Agreements are sent digitally which reduces the time to get printed document.
• The user has the option to forward to a relevant party where he might not be the correct person.
• Reduces the turnaround was taking signatures from multiple stakeholders can be done digitally.

Incentivized

• Some businesses still don't consider digital signing of critical documents a legit way.
• Conga sign still doesn't allow sending of multiple files for signing.
• There is a slight rendering time we have noticed while the customer opens the document which can be reduced.

Incentivized

We're a relatively high-skilled team and we all find Conga Sign's user-friendliness very low for all user types. It should not take a highly skilled tech person to complete documents. Documents need to be user friendly for all user types.

Incentivized

Conga's success team was excellent and very responsive.

Incentivized

Conga Sign works with our existing Salesforce environment. We also use other Conga products such as Batch and Trigger, and Composer. Because of our existing Conga products, Sign was able to be implemented with minimal setup time as users were already familiar the Conga environment and knew what to expect

Incentivized

• We are growing our Strategic Partners and each requires a signed agreement, very essential to growing our business
• We need to update our Plan Administration agreements and having automation for getting and tracking all of the signatures is vital
• Conga Sign is good enough for all our use cases so we don't have to worry about using 3 or 4 solution platforms to gather signatures.

Incentivized