AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMD vs. Epic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMD
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
AdvancedMD (the company formerly owned by ADP) offers AdvancedPM, the company's medical practice management platform combining EHR / EMR capabilities with front office automation and workforce scheduling, medical billing, and advanced revenue reporting capabilities.N/A
Epic Cadence
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Epic Cadence is the company's medical scheduling module.N/A
Pricing
AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMDEpic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMDEpic Cadence
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMDEpic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
Considered Both Products
AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMD
Chose AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMD
The only benefit (which ended up being false for us) was the price point. By theory, it is capable of quite a lot, but sadly we never got that far to even be able to try it. We are just paying for a system we are 100% unable to utilize. We ended up staying with our current EHR …
Chose AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMD
AdvancedMD is a much more user-friendly interface and can be customized much easier without the need for in-house developers. I do think NextGen is more targeted to enterprise level clients as the standard reporting is more in tune with accrual accounting and allows for …
Chose AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMD
AdvancedMD is cloud-based. Kareo PM was cloud-based, but NextGen was not. The ability to reduce in-house infrastructure has been great. When we were using NextGen, it was much easier to reconcile our bank account to the payments posted in the PM software. AdvancedMD's access to …
Chose AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMD
We use both programs in our practice and AdvancedMD is used primarily for scheduling and patient info.
Chose AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMD
I love that ADP AdvancedMD is web-based and you can use it from anywhere you have internet access. Support is available 8am-8pm EST, so someone is always there to help if needed. I'm excited about the ICD-10 tools they are giving clients to assist with that process. They do …
Chose AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMD
ADP AMD is much easier to learn and navigate than most all of the systems I have worked with, including Greenway and Centricity. The only thing I liked better in Centricity was the ability to run more customized reports, but overall, I would choose AMD any day over those two.
Epic Cadence
Chose Epic Cadence
Centricity was limited in ability to scale and customize compared to Cadence for our environment. Also the regular updates for Cadence vs. Centricity is where Cadence really shines. Vendor support is also much better with Cadence over Centricity. We also like the robust …
Chose Epic Cadence
From an enterprise level I would put Cadence at the top of the pack. Compared to many smaller scheduling systems there are less pages to jump through. Scheduling is straightforward and much easier to accomplish.
Chose Epic Cadence
I personally did not select the application, the organization have. Most of the time, I find out that healthcare facilities who have been using many of Epic's application invites or gets a request to be visited by other healthcare organizations thinking of getting the EMR …
Chose Epic Cadence
Cadence is much better than some of the other either text based, or web based solutions out there. Cadence should be used as part of the complete Epic Enterprise package to enjoy the cost benefits of a fully integrated system that maintains the entire Patient Access flow within …
Chose Epic Cadence

Our old legacy system was another vendor system interfaced to the current AD system. If was strictly a scheduling system, it did not pass information other than an account number to the ADT system for registration purposes so was very limited in what it could do beyond …

Chose Epic Cadence
I have had experiance with allscripts in the past and I feel like Cadance is more advanceed and more accurate with capturing patient information and communicating the information back to Epic and our care teams. Cadance has helped us cutomize our Epic system so that we can tack …
Best Alternatives
AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMDEpic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
Small Businesses
Tebra Billing & Payments
Tebra Billing & Payments
Score 7.0 out of 10
RXNT
RXNT
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Epic
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMDEpic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AdvancedPM, by AdvancedMDEpic Cadence Enterprise Scheduling
Likelihood to Recommend
AdvancedMD is appropriate for businesses that desire carte blanche access to the data contained in their entity's database. This is a great system for companies that are data/analytics driven. Unfortunately, the main drawback of the system (inability to accurately track deposit dates of payments) is a CRUCIAL FLAW. If a business is interested in a SIMPLE monthly reconciliation to their bank account, you will struggle with AdvancedMD.
Read full review
Cadence Enterprise Scheduling is well suited when an organization would like to have one EMR system. It is not appropriate when implementing only one application.
Read full review
Pros
  • Detailed Aging reports very easy to follow and helpful in our business.
  • Navigation around appointment scheduler is excellent.
  • Creating custom templates with AMD convenient.
  • Best part--when system is slow, I can instantly send feedback on it, and see results soon!
Read full review
  • Visual interface (GUI) that is better than most of the competition out there.
  • Integration with all other Epic modules, allowing for the entire Patient Access flow to be contained within one system.
  • More power and administrative roles are given to the users rather than the IT staff, providing easier maintenance of the product.
Read full review
Cons
  • Just recently we had an incident in which none of our employees could access the training.advancemd.com training materials. After extensive trouble shooting it was determined the issue was not with the local network, PC configuration, or firewalling. The AdvanceMD support personnel were not empowered to escalate this case as it should have been. Ultimately a correction in the server configuration for the training materials cleared up the issue, but not with assistance from Tier 1 support personnel.
  • Integration with the scanners can be problematic and has been a headache. Even with the Fujitsu scanners, the best in the business, we had challenges and found that some of the Tier 1 support staff were not trained or did not have access to the necessary documentation to fix the issue. The issues were eventually resolved but not without time lost in the process.
Read full review
  • Faster for users with keyboard only access if preferred.
  • Overall faster performance of system interface access.
  • Web-based application with full features.
Read full review
Usability
Overall, I think ADP AdvancedMD is very user friendly and constantly improves as new releases come out.
Read full review
As stated earlier, it seems to be the best out there, from a built perspective as well as a user application. While some practices feel it to be time consuming (Cadence/Prelude) together others who see the whole integration thru the Epicare and Resolute systems love it. From an IT perspective, while sometimes cumbersome to build, the end results are pleasing and satisfying. We can usually accomplish what we set out to do with the practice vision in mind.
Read full review
Support Rating
I've only reached out a couple of times and after being bounced around a few times I simply asked for our internal team to look into the particular question I had. I believe they had some turnover at the time but my experience wasn't great.
Read full review
EPIC has been great in their support and communication at all hours. They also openly communicate when an application TS (Technical Support) will be away and who is covering for that person. During standard non working hours - you always know what number and who to call to get resolution to issues that arise at those times
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
EPI webinars are most informative and not a long drawn out presentation. It also offer screen shots and practice tools.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I have been through implementation of ADP AdvancedMD at other companies and it went smoothly
Read full review
Use implementation team from EPIC but know what you want and make sure that it=s what you get. You can be easily swayed by lack of knowledge on the application and therefore decisions are made that are not correct and then have to be redone. EPIC including Cadence needs a great understanding of the workflows you currently have and how they will be impacted by your build. We had a great understanding of the existing workflows in the offices, however lack of knowledge on the Cadence IT side, had a large impact on what was delivered as our implementers believed that a standard EPIC workflow would suffice and did not.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The only benefit (which ended up being false for us) was the price point. By theory, it is capable of quite a lot, but sadly we never got that far to even be able to try it. We are just paying for a system we are 100% unable to utilize. We ended up staying with our current EHR and will reevaluate it down the road. Definitely will never seek AdvancedMD again.
Read full review
From an enterprise level I would put Cadence at the top of the pack. Compared to many smaller scheduling systems there are less pages to jump through. Scheduling is straightforward and much easier to accomplish.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The automated connection to our EHR has greatly improved our analytic capabilities.
  • Intuitive and efficient interfaces allows us to get new staff up to speed quickly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots