Agorapulse is a social media management tool that aims to help mid-sized businesses and agencies better manage their Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube activity. This social media management tool allows users to post content, engage with their community, and download reports from a single dashboard that is designed to be intuitive. Conversations are captured with the inbox -- depending on the social network, it captures comments, mentions, direct/private…
$49
per user
Wrike
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
Agorapulse
Wrike
Editions & Modules
Standard
$99
up to 10 profiles
Professional
$149
up to 10 profiles
Advanced
$199
per month up to 10 profiles
Custom
Custom Pricing
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Agorapulse
Wrike
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
All plans are free for 30 days.
Additional profiles cost $15/profile.
Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Agorapulse
Wrike
Features
Agorapulse
Wrike
Listening/monitoring
Comparison of Listening/monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
8.5
181 Ratings
10% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Boolean keyword searches
9.3151 Ratings
00 Ratings
Filtering out noise/spam
7.9153 Ratings
00 Ratings
Broad channel coverage
8.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publishing
Comparison of Publishing features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
8.5
250 Ratings
6% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Content planning and scheduling
9.3247 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience targeting
8.8160 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content optimization
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow management
8.7210 Ratings
00 Ratings
Engagement
Comparison of Engagement features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
8.3
245 Ratings
5% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Automated routing and prioritization
7.742 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer interaction histories
8.6222 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bulk actions
8.6203 Ratings
00 Ratings
Marketing
Comparison of Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
7.6
142 Ratings
2% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Lead generation
7.4110 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content marketing
7.98 Ratings
00 Ratings
Paid media management
8.21 Ratings
00 Ratings
Campaigns and promotions
6.9119 Ratings
00 Ratings
Channel coverage/integration
Comparison of Channel coverage/integration features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
8.7
255 Ratings
3% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Twitter
8.5228 Ratings
00 Ratings
Facebook
9.4255 Ratings
00 Ratings
LinkedIn
9.4104 Ratings
00 Ratings
Google+
7.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Instagram
9.3241 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pinterest
9.11 Ratings
00 Ratings
YouTube
8.127 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting/analytics
Comparison of Reporting/analytics features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
9.2
229 Ratings
15% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Campaign success analytics
9.4198 Ratings
00 Ratings
Real-time tracking
9.7195 Ratings
00 Ratings
Competitor analysis
8.4161 Ratings
00 Ratings
Account management
Comparison of Account management features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
9.0
244 Ratings
12% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions & privileges
9.3228 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile access
8.7215 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
-
Ratings
Wrike
8.0
758 Ratings
5% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.9752 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
8.2635 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
8.6531 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.1657 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
8.3643 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
8.7751 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
7.4391 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
8.3348 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
7.4633 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
7.3569 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
7.9550 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
7.6345 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.4266 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse has been a huge benefit to us as a business and is the most comprehensive platform we've used, having previously been with Hootsuite and ContentCal. It is likely to be better for companies that are managing multiple social profiles and want to consolidate these into one manageable platform. Given the amount of features it provides, it might not be suitable for individuals. The reporting is a fantastic part of the platform, which includes brand awareness for certain profiles, the best time to post for engagement, and details that all help with strategising. The inbuilt link shortening and tracking is useful, we've set this up and need to explore its capabilities further. Overall, we would recommend Agorapulse and it's a great asset to our business.
Wrike is well-suited for content creation, review, and management. I can't speak to other types of work it can be suitable for because I use it as a writer only, but I would recommend it to other people in content creation fields who have to work with a team. A friend of mine is an editor at the local newspaper, and I think some features of Wrike would make her editing tasks a little easier and promote more cohesion in her team.
Calendar sharing - great for internal and external approval
Community management - it means we can keep on top of engagement for all of our clients in one place
Report - it's really useful for us to be able to create such in depth reports that we can use internally but also share with clients so they can see the results of what we are doing
different views to accommodate different users workflow
predecessors and successors to tie tasks together and adjust dates as a group
Being able to see other people's workloads so when I am planning my projects for the upcoming quarter, I can set a project delivery date that is better suited to workload and is more realistic
Would love to have a draft feature. We often don't schedule things until the assets are ready, or use a placeholder image and swap them afterwards
Editing posts intended for multiple channels is not as easy as scheduling them in the first place. I would love to edit and have the same menu I do as when I'm scheduling where I have my base text and then the adjusted text for each social media. It's rare that something I've planned to be a similar post across channels, needs editing, but only for one of those channels. e.g. Correcting mistakes or changing strategies.
Currently, I export the analytics and put it in a Google Sheet where I have more control over the data, which I love. For me to use the Agora Reports system, I would need substantial features like comparing metrics in the same charts, using direct line charts instead of smoothed (smoothed charts look nice, but just obfuscate data), separating out paid growth, etc. It's probably too large an ask for what Agora is trying to provide, which is why the export tool is very useful.
While I'm talking about it, a slight bug with the export tool is that when you export two things in quick succession, it just sends a duplicate of the first report via email. I'll export a CSV of Global data and then a CSV of Content, and if I do it too quickly, it doubles up the Global data and I don't get the Content until I resend.
More specific filtering for listening. Sometimes someone has our brand in their name and we get ALL of their content. We have to add each user like this to the filter instead of being able to filter out usernames that contain it.
For example, let's say we are onboarding a new client. There are certain tasks that need to be done. It would be great to be able to create a new project and have certain tasks preloaded.
Importing.
Importing may seem easy, but there is so much nuance to it. The fact that you need to make sure the parent task comes before child tasks is very difficult to do without the help of AI. Also, I am not sure it is possible if you have a thousand tasks to import, to make sure that you have a folder structure and parent/child tasks.
I also find that the documentation is lacking and the 2 import methods lacking as well.
Customize my inbox. When I log into Wrike, my Inbox is the first thing I see, but this doesn't show the full picture of what I want it.
The decision has been made. It's time to get to work--no steps back. I feel confident this product is well suited to help me make progress. I want to get down business and utilize the functionality of this product to meet my marketing goals. I feel very comfortable with the choice I have made.
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Any time I onboard a new team member, they are very quick to adapt to Agora's user interface and therefore require a very quick onboarding process from me, which is a massive plus. While I think having an all-in-one platform would be ideal, there is something to be said about only having a few bells and whistle so that my team can focus on what is most important to us and our clients, content
The platform is intuitive, easy to navigate, and flexible enough to accommodate the complexity of payer contracting workflows. Features such as custom workflows, automated reminders, and real-time collaboration make it simple for our team to stay aligned and efficient. Wrike allows us to track negotiations and related tasks without needing extensive training or technical expertise, which has driven adoption across departments and ensured consistent usage.
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Agorapulse has generally had great performance. Occasionally I have issues with my videos being posted on Instagram. I still am not sure why. the format of the videos is the same as the videos that are going through.
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
The support from Agorapulse is excellent. Any time we have made contact they have been quick to reply, and given added extra information to help. The initial sales experience was also good. Not pushy like a lot of other companies, more that they would like to help. And they certainly did for us at a difficult time which built a fantastic relationship with us from the very start. Communication is great too, with just the right amount of emails and updates. Overall we feel that they genuinely care about their clients and users.
During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Want to post the same content on different profiles? Don't duplicate your posts, you can just select what platform to post them onto! You can even change around the copy/hashtags/etc to optimize the posts for each platform.
We use both monday.com and Wrike. While Monday does have a better user interface, Wrike allows us to have more visibility into tasks where multiple people are collaborating. And also to receive project brief-ins and requests for new projects. We use both differently and I would say for us Wrike is more the collaboration tool than the day to day individual task management tool - and it works great.
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Wrike has improved our resource management significantly.
Wrike has improved the request intake process for us.
One negative impact of using Wrike is that we had to include Workato for some customised automations, which were not supported by Unito, but this can be on a need-to basis.