Agorapulse vs. Wrike

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Agorapulse
Score 8.7 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Agorapulse is a social media management tool that aims to help mid-sized businesses and agencies better manage their Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube activity. This social media management tool allows users to post content, engage with their community, and download reports from a single dashboard that is designed to be intuitive. Conversations are captured with the inbox -- depending on the social network, it captures comments, mentions, direct/private…
$99
up to 10 profiles
Wrike
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$0
per month per user
Pricing
AgorapulseWrike
Editions & Modules
Standard
$99
up to 10 profiles
Professional
$149
up to 10 profiles
Advanced
$199
per month up to 10 profiles
Custom
Custom Pricing
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AgorapulseWrike
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAll plans are free for 30 days. Additional profiles cost $15/profile.Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AgorapulseWrike
Considered Both Products
Agorapulse
Chose Agorapulse
Better pricing, great support staff, ease or use, a full suite of content planning, analytics, inboxes.
Chose Agorapulse
Agorapulse is by far the greatest value for the highest capabilities across all aspects of social media management, and they have excellent customer service and communication in case you ever need support. While some of these other products that I have used or evaluated may be …
Chose Agorapulse
I think Agorapulse is by far the most comprehensive platform and user-friendly. In my experience, the support on hand is responsive and easy to speak with through the online chat. Hootsuite, Adobe Express, and Buffer seemed limited in what they offer in comparison, particularly …
Chose Agorapulse
I used this in an old job years ago so I was familiar with a social media planning program, but I don't feel I remember enough to truly compare. However, the little I do remember, I do like Agorapulse better!
Chose Agorapulse
Want to post the same content on different profiles? Don't duplicate your posts, you can just select what platform to post them onto! You can even change around the copy/hashtags/etc to optimize the posts for each platform.
Chose Agorapulse
SEM Rush was okay for scheduling content. It didn't have any helpful features though. I switched because every time I uploaded an image or graphic to SEM Rush, it would have a white line at the very bottom and right side of the upload. The image was flush to the artboard before …
Chose Agorapulse
Way more user friendly, easier to consult and faster to go were you need to. With Hootsuite there is a lot of scrolling for nothing.
Chose Agorapulse
Eclincher is well designed and easy for the user to navigate. It has exactly what a social media manager needs and I think eclincher seriously needs to improve their UI
Chose Agorapulse
Hootsuite was too difficult to connect to our social media accounts.
Chose Agorapulse
We selected Agora due to better pricing for the core features we use so we don't feel that we are overpaying for tools we are not using much. Also, in comparison to Hootsuite, Agorapulse has better a community management tool, allowing labeling and easy automation which is key …
Chose Agorapulse
Agorapulse is more affordable while offering comparable functionality. It's difficult to find competitors that provide everything Agorapulse has to offer.
Chose Agorapulse
They have pros and cons. It's generally better than Hootsuite but more expensive. We use Later too for social planning. Perhaps it'd be useful to better understand everything we can do in Agora.
Chose Agorapulse
Later is a fairly simple tool just for scheduling, while Agora handles a lot more variety of tasks and I think executes on them very well.
Chose Agorapulse
We have used many different tools in the past but Agorapulse really is the best in terms of unifying all of our platforms in one place. It saves us time on a daily basis and means we can limit how many programmes we use. Why use five when one will do!
Chose Agorapulse
Agorapulse has YouTube, while many other platforms do not. It's user-friendly for agencies managing multiple clients. Statusbrew doesn't have a cap on the size of videos/pictures you can upload, which is nice, but it's also four times more expensive. Hootsuite has too many …
Chose Agorapulse
The reporting in Agorapulse and the ability to approve was one of the reasons for choosing Agorapulse. The cost basis was lower when we added all the features versus the free version of Hootsuite.

Another aspect was the UX/UI which was much more pleasant[.]
Chose Agorapulse
Agorapulse offers more customized features for our needs at an affordable price.
Chose Agorapulse
Agorapulse falls in the upper to middle levels of the other platforms listed. Overall, Agorapulse is not too expensive but also doesn't have certain integrations that a Hootsuite or a Falcon would have. Sendible is great but too simplistic for our needs of the many different …
Chose Agorapulse
Agorapulse allows creating one post on several platforms at the same time and also adjusting the description on each platform separately. The last time I used Buffer it was awhile ago and the description of the post needed to be generic to be able to work for all platforms at …
Wrike
Chose Wrike
I think Wrike is comparable against these competitors - it reminds me of Trello the most in terms of interface. I did not personally select Wrike, I am a user, not the purchase decision maker.
Chose Wrike
I like Wrike best. I liked Asana, but I think it got too pricey for the features that we wanted out of it. Notion was fine, but I think its ability to integrate with the rest of our tech stack proved difficult. Trello was fine, it was early in my career and I remember its ease …
Chose Wrike
I'm in the process of evaluating ClickUp, and so far, it seems far more robust in the areas that matter (integrations, automation, speed, ease of use) where it could apply to small and medium orgs. I have another call with ClickUp and if their pricing holds, we may end up …
Chose Wrike
Jira is really geared towards IT organizations. It is far more complex to use so it has a steeper learning curve, but once you get the hang of it, it does have more customization capabilities and it offers more functionalities, such as extra fields, types of graphs, etc.... …
Chose Wrike
Wrike provides multiple use cases on managing workflow through the various range of functionalities provided. Trello more so provides a straight forward way to obtain a full scope view of projects, but Wrike is more comprehensive in managing all stages.
Chose Wrike
Wrike is definitely easier to use and easier to teach team members to use
Chose Wrike
We use both Wrike and Smartsheet to satisfy our necessities. Smartsheet gives us a platform to input more information, while in Wrike we stablish contact with our customers for proofing before product development; information that goes directly into our Smartsheet once the …
Chose Wrike
differnt platform and different user features
Chose Wrike
ClickUp and Wrike look very different - when I think of Wrike, I think of larger tasks, but ClickUp I used for smaller lists & used the calendar view more.
Chose Wrike
The visuals are appealing and make it user friendly. It is similar to adobe programs with functionality for approval and editing of documents.
Chose Wrike
Great for large project and/or complex projects. However there can be a learning curve. I would possibly choose a different platform if I am working with non-techy team members.
Chose Wrike
Wrike is better than both as it allows for greater visibility and is more similar to an excel based system, which i think has a much better initial understanding of all users.
Chose Wrike
Very similar. Our global team used Wrike when we merged so we all moved to the same platform
Chose Wrike
Wrike has been a helpful benchmark of industry standard. Many people who have used other similar platforms have been able to easily transition to Wrike.
Chose Wrike
I have used inhouse project management tool in my previous company.
It was very slow compared to Wrike, visualisation is better in Wrike, they did not have customised template increasing repetitive work, the tool used in previous company was very slow as it takes like a lot of …
Chose Wrike
Figma is similar in many regards from the ways I've used it. Wrike is far superior to Workamajig in terms of visual language and ease of use; however, Workamajig seems to be more robust for the expansive needs of an agency.
Chose Wrike
It's a bit more user friendly than salesforce
Chose Wrike
They all have pros and cons, but Workfront is the most robust, while Asana is the middle ground for affordability that meets all our teams’ needs.
Chose Wrike
Wrike is very similar, but the others integrate with our overall Microsoft organization better
Chose Wrike
Wrike has a much deeper feature set than Trello, though does cost significantly more. Azure Devops is better suited to developer workflows out of the box but overall, I would be inclined to use Wrike due to the simpler UX/UI.
Chose Wrike
Wrike always works - it's always up-to-date, never down, and our one source of truth.
I wish the mobile version of Wrike was more usable, but that's the only thing where Wrike may not be the front runner.
Chose Wrike
Much prefer Wrike - easier to use and much better for the teams that use them as well as managers and team leads
Chose Wrike
In my opinion, Wrike is very similar to Asana (Asana has Wrike beat when it comes to completing tasks. Who doesn't enjoy seeing a rainbow unicorn fly across the screen when marking a task complete). Jira is also very similar but a bit more robust as it integrates with Aha for …
Chose Wrike
There are similarities in offerings, but Wrike is more friendly in the visual presentation of the projects.
Features
AgorapulseWrike
Listening/monitoring
Comparison of Listening/monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
8.5
Ratings
10% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Boolean keyword searches9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Filtering out noise/spam7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Broad channel coverage8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Publishing
Comparison of Publishing features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
8.5
Ratings
6% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Content planning and scheduling9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience targeting8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Content optimization7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow management8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Engagement
Comparison of Engagement features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
8.3
Ratings
5% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Automated routing and prioritization7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer interaction histories8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk actions8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Marketing
Comparison of Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Lead generation7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Content marketing7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Paid media management8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaigns and promotions6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Channel coverage/integration
Comparison of Channel coverage/integration features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
8.7
Ratings
3% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Twitter8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Facebook9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
LinkedIn9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Google+7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Instagram9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Pinterest9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
YouTube8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting/analytics
Comparison of Reporting/analytics features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
9.2
Ratings
15% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Campaign success analytics9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Real-time tracking9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Competitor analysis8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Account management
Comparison of Account management features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
9.0
Ratings
12% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions & privileges9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile access8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
-
Ratings
Wrike
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Agorapulse
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.8
Ratings
3% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AgorapulseWrike
Small Businesses
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Social Suite by Reputation.com
Social Suite by Reputation.com
Score 9.4 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AgorapulseWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.7
(0 ratings)
6.9
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.3
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
4.6
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
5.9
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AgorapulseWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
I think Agora is great for small teams looking to schedule posts and respond to users. I haven't used it at scale, so I can't recommend it for larger companies, but I love it for what we do. If you're savvy with Google Sheets, then the Agora exports are really handy. If you don't need specific data or the ability to compare metrics, and just want a surface-level look at your social performance, the analytics tools are nice.
Read full review
Negotiations often involve long timelines and multiple rounds of discussion. Wrike allows us to assign clear ownership, track due dates, and monitor progress so that nothing stalls or gets lost. Redlines, proposals, and finalized agreements can be stored and shared within Wrike, reducing reliance on scattered email chains and ensuring everyone is working from the most current version.
Read full review
Pros
  • Calendar sharing - great for internal and external approval
  • Community management - it means we can keep on top of engagement for all of our clients in one place
  • Report - it's really useful for us to be able to create such in depth reports that we can use internally but also share with clients so they can see the results of what we are doing
Read full review
  • different views to accommodate different users workflow
  • predecessors and successors to tie tasks together and adjust dates as a group
  • Being able to see other people's workloads so when I am planning my projects for the upcoming quarter, I can set a project delivery date that is better suited to workload and is more realistic
Read full review
Cons
  • Reporting not available for personal accounts
  • Adding TikTok
  • Ability to tag personal accounts in LinkedIn and FaceBook
  • When copying from one platform to another, one has to go and redo the tags or they will not come up properly. If the the @ is the same in the two platforms, it should take that into consideration and not ask to re-enter.
Read full review
  • Templating.
  • For example, let's say we are onboarding a new client. There are certain tasks that need to be done. It would be great to be able to create a new project and have certain tasks preloaded.
  • Importing.
  • Importing may seem easy, but there is so much nuance to it. The fact that you need to make sure the parent task comes before child tasks is very difficult to do without the help of AI. Also, I am not sure it is possible if you have a thousand tasks to import, to make sure that you have a folder structure and parent/child tasks.
  • I also find that the documentation is lacking and the 2 import methods lacking as well.
  • Customize my inbox. When I log into Wrike, my Inbox is the first thing I see, but this doesn't show the full picture of what I want it.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
The decision has been made. It's time to get to work--no steps back. I feel confident this product is well suited to help me make progress. I want to get down business and utilize the functionality of this product to meet my marketing goals. I feel very comfortable with the choice I have made.
Read full review
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
The user interface is fantastic. Clear and easy to use. The layout and navigation is very well thought out enabling us to work quicker, and smarter. Moving around Agorapulse becomes second nature very quickly, which makes day to day workflows so much easier. The features included are comprehensive, especially the reporting. And having everything in one place for messaging and monitoring is a real help
Read full review
I love the way task management is designed within Wrike. The full overview, followed by sequential updates, really works for us - this way, we don't need to go into individual people's work subtasks to find what's happening with a project. That's very useful from a project management perspective. The to-do feature also lets everyone access info in one place.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Agorapulse occasionally has outages or shuts down. It never interferes with my use of the application or any of my posts
Read full review
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
Agorapulse has generally had great performance. Occasionally I have issues with my videos being posted on Instagram. I still am not sure why. the format of the videos is the same as the videos that are going through.
Read full review
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
Absolutely amazing customer service. Some of it seems very automated and feels like you are not talking to a person. It would be better if it was just a normal email platform that it was coming from. But overall super great customer service and the company is always willing to walk new members through the use of Agorapulse which is awesome.
Read full review
We've had so many questions during the establishment of Wrike for our team, and the Wrike support team has exceeded our expectations. Our team is naturally curious, and the Wrike support team has always been willing to hold conversations about how we can make an idea work, to show us hidden features that delight us, and to help us plan ways to build out projects efficiently. They meet our questions with multiple solutions and best practices
Read full review
In-Person Training
I did not train in person
Read full review
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
The staff walked me through the whole platform and asked me if I had any questions. They were very helpful in answering any questions I had.
Read full review
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Be sure of the game play mechanics you need to achieve your objectives, it will help significantly in setting up the game and creating the assets
Read full review
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I think Agorapulse is by far the most comprehensive platform and user-friendly. In my experience, the support on hand is responsive and easy to speak with through the online chat. Hootsuite, Adobe Express, and Buffer seemed limited in what they offer in comparison, particularly Adobe Express and Buffer. Both these platforms were clunkier for us to use and didn't offer as much in terms of listening and reporting. We used Hootsuite a few years ago and moved away from it before we developed our strategy, planning and reporting for social, so it might have the same capabilities as Agorapulse but the support and usability do not match.
Read full review
Jira did not at all help us get our work done as content creators. I think that was because Jira wasn't quite right for our uses. Wrike fits our needs so much better. I can't tell you enough the relief I felt when we adopted Wrike and I never had to use Jira again.
Read full review
Scalability
I'm not sure I understand what is meant by scalability.
Read full review
Wrike has significantly enhanced our workflow and productivity, ensuring accuracy and efficiency meet high standards. Our work now reflects professionalism and top quality. Other departments have taken notice of how organized we are thanks to Wrike, and we take great pride in our work—all made possible by this platform
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Agorapulse has been able to be the leading platform for us to maintain and grow our client base
  • Clients tend to be frustrated with Agorapulse and often have trouble viewing the content leading us to consider other alternatives which would affect our ROI.
  • Agorapulse does however, push us to utilize all its features, increase strategy, and in doing so, offer additional competitive packages.
Read full review
  • Wrike has improved our resource management significantly.
  • Wrike has improved the request intake process for us.
  • One negative impact of using Wrike is that we had to include Workato for some customised automations, which were not supported by Unito, but this can be on a need-to basis.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Agorapulse Screenshots

Screenshot of Through a bulk or one-by-one upload, queued content can be organized into categories that make sense for the business and content strategy. Download a CSV of the queued content to share with teammates or clients.Screenshot of Agorapulse's reports helps to discover trends in a company's social media performance and offers actionable tips to optimize its social presence.Screenshot of The tool's built-in CRM keeps track of fans and followers (and detractors).Screenshot of Agorapulse's reports helps to discover trends in a company's social media performance and offers actionable tips to optimize its social presence.Screenshot of A drag-and-drop calendar displays at glance published, scheduled, queued, and assigned content. Hovering on a date instantly creates content for that day.Screenshot of The Agorapulse  inbox captures incoming conversations for each social profile. Users can get CRM data on who is sending messages, and send them a saved reply or assign the conversation to a teammate.

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of Space workflowsScreenshot of Space workflows