AIRSTRIP ONE vs. eClinicalWorks
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRSTRIP ONE | N/A | N/A | Airstrip Technologies developed medical software to deliver real time, critical patient data to the mobile devices of those who need it most. AirStrip’s solutions provide the engagement, collaboration and insight caregivers and health systems need to provide patient-centered care—anytime, anywhere. AirStrip's Trey Moore set out to develop a way to transmit actionable, real-time patient data to cellular devices in 2004 and has been backed by Sequoia Venture Capital since 2010. | N/A |
![]() eClinicalWorks | Score9.9 out of 10 | N/A | eClinicalWorks headquartered in Westborough offers their EHR / EMR solution, which can be upgraded to a full practice management solution at higher pricing tiers. | $449 per month per provider |
| AIRSTRIP ONE | eClinicalWorks | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| AIRSTRIP ONE | eClinicalWorks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billing and Claims Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patient Scheduling |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Electronic Medical Records |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Medical Security and Privacy |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Workflow and Scale |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AIRSTRIP ONE | eClinicalWorks | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 2.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 2.0 |
| Usability | - | 2.1 |
| Performance | - | 4.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 1.0 |
| In-Person Training | - | 2.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 4.0 |
