TrustRadius

Aiven vs. Confluent

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aiven
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Aiven provides managed open source data technologies on all major clouds, providing managed cloud infrastructure so that developers can focus purely on creating applications. Meanwhile, Aiven will manage the user's cloud data infrastructure.N/A
Confluent
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Confluent Cloud is a cloud-native service for Apache Kafka used to connect and process data in real time with a fully managed data streaming platform. Confluent Platform is the self-managed version.
$0
Pricing
AivenConfluent
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$0
Standard
Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise
Starting at ~$1,150
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AivenConfluent
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AivenConfluent
Considered Both Products
Aiven

No answer on this topic

Confluent
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Confluent
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Confluent
We chose to use the Confluent Platform because they provide enterprise-grade customer service support. Whenever we have trouble setting up or using the service, we can create a ticket for them and it will be resolved pretty fast. Kafka is the open-source software that comes …
Features
AivenConfluent
Database-as-a-Service
Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Aiven
7.0
Ratings
21% below category average
Confluent
-
Ratings
Monitoring and metrics7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic host deployment7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Streaming Analytics
Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Aiven
-
Ratings
Confluent
9.1
Ratings
13% above category average
Real-Time Data Analysis00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Visualization Dashboards00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Low Latency00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Integrated Development Tools00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Linear Scale-Out00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Data Enrichment00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AivenConfluent
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
IBM Streams (discontinued)
IBM Streams (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 6.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AivenConfluent
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AivenConfluent
Likelihood to Recommend
Aiven is well suited for medium/big companies where the reliability for events coming in is imperative and choose to use Kafka but would like to avoid the most complex parts of the integration and instead have an easy setup. It is less suited in my opinion for smaller companies, mainly due to its pricing.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
If your company needs to build event-driven applications, like in healthcare industry, you need to enhance interoperability, and you are seeking a reliable service with enterprise-grade support, Confluent is the best on the market you can get. Their product works great and they provide very good customer service.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Products work great.
  • Training is available.
  • Customer support is good.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Confluent replaced Microsoft Event Hubs in our environment and unblocked data platform services rollout globally.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots