Akamai API Gateway vs. Amazon API Gateway

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Akamai API Gateway
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Akamai offers their API Gateway, touting easy control and access to enterprise applications via their services.N/A
Amazon API Gateway
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
AWS offers the Amazon API Gateway supports the creation and publication of an API for web applications, as well as its monitoring and maintenance. The Amazon API Gateway is able to support thousands of API calls concurrently and provides traffic management, as well as monitoring and access control.
$0.90
Per Million
Pricing
Akamai API GatewayAmazon API Gateway
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Past 300 Million
$0.90
Per Million
First 300 Million
$1.00
Per Million
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Akamai API GatewayAmazon API Gateway
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Akamai API GatewayAmazon API Gateway
Features
Akamai API GatewayAmazon API Gateway
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
Akamai API Gateway
7.7
Ratings
7% below category average
Amazon API Gateway
7.7
Ratings
7% below category average
API access control8.00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies7.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
API usage data8.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
API user onboarding8.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
API versioning7.00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Usage billing and payments7.00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
API monitoring and logging9.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
User Ratings
Akamai API GatewayAmazon API Gateway
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Akamai API GatewayAmazon API Gateway
Likelihood to Recommend
It is really helpful for managing [the] scaling of systems with need and utilizing resources when needed. Also, DevOps support for deployment plans is quite useful when deploying applications. Monitoring systems with graphQL and utilizing them in APIs is quite helpful when used in Microservices systems to identify system capabilities and user utilization of applications.
Read full review
API GW is great for giving access to asynchronous operations that are fast and don't need to be online all the time. Lambda functions are the classic example. In the past, an operation that is called on via an HTTP endpoint would be implemented using a server-based solution. With high availability in place that would include a server or two and a load balancer. Over time this setup can be costly, especially if the service is not used at full capacity; cycles are wasted when the servers are sitting there waiting to respond. If the operation can be distilled down to a function, an API GW + Lambda solution could be put in place that performs the operation as needed only when requested. Comparing the low price point for API GW requests and Lambda CPU+Memory, the savings can be night and day over the server-based implementation.
Read full review
Pros
  • Graphically representation in GraphQL
  • Scaling system
  • DevOps management
Read full review
  • API Gateway integrates well with AWS Lambda. This allows us to build a web server in the language and framework of our choice, deploy it as a Lambda function, and expose it through API Gateway.
  • API Gateway manages API keys. Building rate limiting and request quota features are not trivial (or interesting).
  • API Gateway's pricing can be very attractive for services that are accessed infrequently.
Read full review
Cons
  • Quota enforcement can be simplified
  • Caching mechanism for API with akamai can be improved
  • Gateway configuration can be simplified as details are not much elaborate
Read full review
  • I think there should be another way of enabling CORS. It basically creates OPTIONS for every endpoint, which makes your API Gateway look complicated.
  • The integration timeout limit is 30 seconds, which limits you into that time.
  • API Gateway UI should be improved and should work correctly when more than two people are adding/editing endpoints.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We always had a great experience with the AWS support team. They were always on time and very dependable. It was a good partnership while we worked to resolve our issues.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Akamai [API Gateway] helps better in terms of representation of graphQL and its consumption in monitoring system making a package for deployment speed with monitoring and scaling application with all services and utilizing most of a system without much knowledge of other aspects. Also, [a] user-friendly system helps people to handle [the] system with necessary options
Read full review
Pricing is better at Amazon API gateway. Amazon API gateway is more user-friendly than SAP HANA Cloud. But SAP HANA Cloud supports more programming languages. The centralized management and monitoring system of Amazon API Gateway is more user-friendly. The User-Interface of Amazon API gateway is also better. Overall we can conclude that Amazon API Gateway provides a better work experience than SAP HANA.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Decrease in time required for deployment and monitoring by significant amount causing less support resources needed
  • Scaling applications on month-end at high usage time has reduced TAT time for issues and no of issues occurring
  • Quota enforcement has allowed [managing] multiple systems and their needs in respective stakeholders hands and reduced infra teams involvement in [the] management of reoccurring problems
Read full review
  • Positive, which accelerated business deliveries in months
  • Negative, but in our positive case, if you are going to change the solution in the future, you need to adjust several things for the new solution.
  • Positive, users celebrated with ease of use (lower learning curve, lower cost).
  • Positive - Pay according to usage
Read full review
ScreenShots