Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) vs. AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) from AWS is designed for application workloads that benefit from fine tuning for performance, cost and capacity. Typical use cases include Big Data analytics engines (like the Hadoop/HDFS ecosystem and Amazon EMR clusters), relational and NoSQL databases (like Microsoft SQL Server and MySQL or Cassandra and MongoDB), stream and log processing applications (like Kafka and Splunk), and data warehousing applications (like Vertica and Teradata).N/A
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is the platform-as-a-service offering provided by Amazon and designed to leverage AWS services such as Amazon Elastic Cloud Compute (Amazon EC2), Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3).
$0
Users pay for AWS resources (e.g. EC2, S3 buckets, etc.) used to store and run the application.
Pricing
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No Charge
$0
Users pay for AWS resources (e.g. EC2, S3 buckets, etc.) used to store and run the application.
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Considered Both Products
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Amazon S3 is an object based storage and not a block based storage. It can be mounted on a volume but cannot be used as a boot volume. Moreover, it is not as fast as EBS. S3 is generally used to store objects for long term storage and not as a persistent storage on an EC2 …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
It is backed by most succesfull company in the field. They were one of the first to offer and we historically tied with Amazon Web Servieces product family. We appreciate their afforts and happy to serve our customers to implement their ideas in the cloud. Amazon Elastic Block …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Volumes range from cost-effective dollar-per-GB to high performance with the fastest IOPS and throughput. You can change volume types, tune performance, or increase volume size without disrupting your critical applications. EBS volumes are replicated within an Availability Zone …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) is a better option than Microsoft Azure Disk Storage for customers that require more volume-type options and cost-effective data archiving.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Its comparable, but overall I think the user interface to manage Disk Block Storage is better in AWS compared to Google Cloud
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Amazon RDS uses Amazon Elastic Block Store storage, so you can get similar performance and not have to manage a database server if you were planning to use RDS with a database.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
EBS is easy to use and very cost efficient which helps in cost reduction of maintenance and data storage. AWS EBS is a highly available and durable storage as compared to others.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
I've only used Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Azure so far, but I prefer AWS Elastic Block Store because it offers more benefits than Azure, and I found it to be quite good and useful for data storing. At this moment, we are not looking for another hosting provider.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
This EBS has a good recovery system, So some distance I even have most effective used Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Azure however comparatively choose AWS elastic Block shop as its having extra benefits than Azure and I observed it pretty excellent and it helped plenty …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Amazon Elastic Block Store is an excellent storage replication solution. It gives you a quick and simple way to get all the storage you need, and you may alter it if you need more or less storage for your projects.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
I favor AWS elastic Block store over Azure since it offers more benefits, and I found it to be pretty satisfying and useful for data storage. At this moment, we are not looking for another hosting provider.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
So far I have only used Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Azure but comparatively [I] prefer AWS elastic Block store as its having more advantages than Azure and I found it quite satisfactory and it helped a lot for information storage. We are not looking for any other …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
So far I have only used Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Azure but comparatively [I] prefer AWS elastic Block store as its having more advantages than Azure and I found it quite satisfactory and it helped a lot for information storage. We are not looking for any other …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
As of now, I have only used Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) it is well satisfactory and that helps a lot in storing information. We are not looking for any other service provider for storage as of now.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Basically, we choose EBS because we are using AWS, we have already evaluated 3 cloud providers AWS, GCP, and azure. And we decided to use AWS because of some elements. Mostly because AWS has a native Linux operating system (amazon Linux).
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
The reason I selected Amazon Elastic block store is because of their fast and quick response, a wide variety of services that can be easily available on a single platform. Easy integration with different platforms through APIs, security, pay as you go, service on demand, and …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Amazon Elastic Block Store is a very good scaling solution for storage if you are invested in AWS. It provides a quick and easy way for you to easily get all the storage you need at and adjust it if you need more or less storage for your projects.
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
There are many services like AWS Elastic beanstalk, but there are none with the maturity in the platform or the cost-effectiveness of AWS Elastic Beanstalk. Also, AWS Elastic Beanstalk is the oldest among them, so there are more people with AWS experience than the other …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
I have used App Engine on Google Cloud Platform and App Service on Microsoft Azure. Both offer similar capabilities to AWS Elastic Beanstalk. App Engine has the nice ability to scale to 0 instances when the application has not been in use for some time. This allows for …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
As it supports end to end flow of application deployment and not a part of any individual process like other AWS products, AWS Elastic Beanstalk can be a game changer in cloud industry.
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
The AWS platform provides a great deal of configurability that is abstracted and provided very well through AWS Elastic Beanstalk. This is the main reason for choosing Elastic Beanstalk over competing services. Another reason for selecting AWS Beanstalk was vendor …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
I selected AWS Elastic Beanstalk mainly because we have been using AWS services for our company. Using AWS Elastic Beanstalk is relatively easier than starting to use a completely new cloud platform. But we are also reviewing Google App Engine, and found out Elastic Beanstalk …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is equivalent to Google App Engine in terms of product. I selected AWS Elastic Beanstalk because it was within the stack we were using, and it made sense for us given the other architecture.
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
I use both EB and Lambda for different use cases. I normally use AWS Lambda for my smaller software needs.
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
We now default to Amazon ECS, due to flexibility this gives us with how workloads scale, and more network flexibility as many of our workloads are internal / external facing. We selected Elastic Beanstalk at beginning of our containerization phase, which suited our needs …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Azure currently doesn't have a solution that's similar to this but you can do a lot of the features with several of the components that Microsoft Azure offers. AWS Elastic Beanstalk exists in that niche market where if you have an existing solution, this is a great way to move &…
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
We were already hosting on AWS so it just made sense to keep our infrastructure where we have it. And it all works pretty nicely.
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS is much more focused on scalability, but Heroku was much easier to get things up and running as a beginner. For simple hosting, I would stick to something like Heroku or Netlify. That said, Elastic Beanstalk is meant for more performant functions requiring large scaling and …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a great option for an organization that's already invested in the AWS ecosystem. The greater the number of complementary features needed by the application (e.g. integrating with Amazon's Elastic Load Balancer, databases, etc), the greater the reward …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
We also use Heroku and it is a great platform for smaller projects and light Node.js services, but we have found that in terms of cost, the Elastic Beanstalk option is more affordable for the projects that we undertake. The fact that it sits inside of the greater AWS Cloud …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
We ended up with AWS Lambda to take workload off the developers and develop in tandem, then later integrate. We use both though.
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
I enjoyed that Lightsail was so simple to provision and access via the in-browser SSH terminal, but ultimately Elastic Beanstalk is a more robust offering that interfaces seamlessly with more of AWS's other services. Elastic Beanstalk is also better equipped to automate …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
I selected these solutions because they are the closest to being able to set up separate server or VM instances. As far as performance and scalability, Heroku does offer an autoscale option, but the base cost to have the autoscale in place, sets Heroku behind EBS. Digital …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
We didn't use Lambda much till now. We, however, found better control of resources in EBS.
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Honestly, I haven't tried any other alternative products. As already mentioned, I am already heavily invested in AWS, so EBS was a natural choice for me. In other reviews, I have found, AWS is better than its competitors. There are more flavors, and options in AWS, better …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Heroku is another similar product which we had tried out to deploy one of the NodeJs project and it has lot of developer friendly features as well. Though Heroku is more expensive than Beanstalk is what I found. Heroku also has some restrictions which can affect the …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
The other main competitor that I have used would probably be Heroku. While Heroku is incredibly simple and easy to get a sample web app online, its dashboard and product connectivity didn't feel quite as seamless as AWS Elastic Beanstalk. AWS Elastic Beanstalk has a higher up …
Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
In some of the other companies that I've worked in, I've had the opportunity to work with the above softwares where the structure and architecture of the services was much complicated but the above softwares were able to handle it with more ease and efficiency. The complex …
Features
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
-
Ratings
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Small Businesses
Vultr
Vultr
Score 6.8 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 10.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 10.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Likelihood to Recommend
EBS is well-suited for use as a storage option for databases, including relational databases, NoSQL databases, and big data analytics databases. EBS can provide high IOPS (Input/Output Operations per Second) and low latency. EBS provides a high-availability storage solution, which ensures that your data is always available and accessible even in case of a single or multiple availability zone failures. EBS can also be replicated across multiple availability zones to ensure data durability. The scenario where I find it less appropriate is in terms of cost; EBS can be more expensive than other storage options, such as Amazon S3, especially for large amounts of data or for infrequently accessed data.
Read full review
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is well suited for [the] rapid development of applications that use standard compute platforms based on popular programming languages. So getting a Go, Python, Ruby, or Node.js app going in AWS Elastic Beanstalk will be easy. For non-standard applications, containers provide another option for using AWS Elastic Beanstalk. In either case, AWS Elastic Beanstalk is well suited for applications that are [self-contained]. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is also good for development or test environments that need a built-in deployment method. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is less appropriate for complex applications that rely on multiple AWS services. While deploying and running the base code might be easy to get going, it may be difficult to apply permissions and integrations with the other services.
Read full review
Pros
  • Raw storage capacity attached to your instance operative system
  • Frequent data rewriting (mission critical for reporting)
  • Low latency connectivity (14 reporting subsidiaries in different time zones)
  • Videly spreaded for implementation
  • Fast accessible drive
  • Block storage are core for Java, Net mobile applications
Read full review
  • Extremely easy to get set up and get apps deployed.
  • Integrates really well with existing build processes and is manageable through a suite of CLI tools.
  • It is very easy to scale up.
  • The documentation is exceptionally detailed and covers a very wide range of deployment scenarios.
Read full review
Cons
  • EBS volume can be attached to only one EC2 instance at a time
  • The volumes are limited to the Availability zones of the instance they are attached to
  • The maximum size is 64TB. We have had usecases where we needed larger volume
  • The backup snapshots are stored on S3 and that's an additional cost.
Read full review
  • How to more easily integrate with other other AWS services. There are plenty out there, but it's not quite as seamless as I feel like it should be to mix and match products.
  • Make backing up easier when scaling the server. It took quite a bit of time to make sure we had everything set up in case something went wrong.
  • When you are first starting to use AWS, the dashboard can be very intimidating. There are countless products all with names that aren't very indicative of what they actually do.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
As our technology grows, it makes more sense to individually provision each server rather than have it done via beanstalk. There are several reasons to do so, which I cannot explain without further diving into the architecture itself, but I can tell you this. With automation, you also loose the flexibility to morph the system for your specific needs. So if you expect that in future you need more customization to your deployment process, then there is a good chance that you might try to do things individually rather than use an automation like beanstalk.
Read full review
Usability
Amazon EBS is a great tool and fairly easy to use as long as you are familiar with the Amazon Web Service ecosystem. It allows a great way for you to move storage around easily and allows you to quickly provision storage as needed based on the business requirement. For us, it's easy to move between our EC2 images that had been linked with EBS storage between these Amazon accounts.
Read full review
The overall usability is good enough, as far as the scaling, interactive UI and logging system is concerned, could do a lot better when it comes to the efficiency, in case of complicated node logics and complicated node architectures. It can have better software compatibility and can try to support collaboration with more softwares
Read full review
Support Rating
The support for Amazon Elastic Block Store is great as long as you can articulate your needs. Like most tools, there may be some back and forth before you find a support person that is knowledgable in the tool and can provide you with necessary insights.
Read full review
As I described earlier it has been really cost effective and really easy for fellow developers who don't want to waste weeks and weeks into learning and manually deploying stuff which basically takes month to create and go live with the Minimal viable product (MVP). With AWS Beanstalk within a week a developer can go live with the Minimal viable product easily.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
- Do as many experiments as you can before you commit on using beanstalk or other AWS features. - Keep future state in mind. Think through what comes next, and if that is technically possible to do so. - Always factor in cost in terms of scaling. - We learned a valuable lesson when we wanted to go multi-region, because then we realized many things needs to change in code. So if you plan on using this a lot, factor multiple regions.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Volumes range from cost-effective dollar-per-GB to high performance with the fastest IOPS and throughput. You can change volume types, tune performance, or increase volume size without disrupting your critical applications. EBS volumes are replicated within an Availability Zone (AZ) and can easily scale to petabytes of data. Build your SAN in the cloud for I/O-intensive applications. Run relational or NoSQL databases.
Read full review
There are many services like AWS Elastic beanstalk, but there are none with the maturity in the platform or the cost-effectiveness of AWS Elastic Beanstalk. Also, AWS Elastic Beanstalk is the oldest among them, so there are more people with AWS experience than the other platforms. The only thing is their documentation and UX are a bit old, which doesn't stop it from performing greatly, but yes, if you are looking for better UX, then you can check out other options.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • In terms of ROI, I found it's really cost-effective since maintenance cost is not there. No need to spend extra money on the procurement of hard drives
  • On demand feature of Ebs is quite effective when you require extra storage you can allocate and pay as per your need.
  • Accessibility from everywhere and deployment of it across different geographical location.
Read full review
  • Elastic Beanstalk removes countless hours from development team responsibility, freeing up those resources to instead focus on building the products that our customers want to use.
  • As a business that is already embedded into using EC2 instances, it's essentially free to leverage the work that AWS performs on configuring the Elastic Beanstalk stacks.
  • With Elastic Beanstalk, while there is still a responsibility to ensure that applications can work with updated underlying dependencies, it's much easier when AWS handled the heavy lifting of updating the stacks.
Read full review
ScreenShots