TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Apache Hadoop vs. Apache Hive

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Hadoop

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/AHadoop is an open source software from Apache, supporting distributed processing and data storage. Hadoop is popular for its scalability, reliability, and functionality available across commoditized hardware.N/A

    Apache Hive

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AApache Hive is database/data warehouse software that supports data querying and analysis of large datasets stored in the Hadoop distributed file system (HDFS) and other compatible systems, and is distributed under an open source license.N/A
    Pricing
    HadoopApache Hive
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HadoopApache Hive
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    HadoopApache Hive
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    Chose Hadoop
    • For real-time streaming, use Spark; can provide a stark contrast to the way MR works
    • Hadoop offers a scalable, cost-effective and highly available solution for big data storage and processing.
    • Amazon Redshift is somewhat closer to Hadoop. But to analyze Petabytes of data Hadoop …
    Incentivized
    Chose Hadoop
    • For real-time streaming, use Spark; can provide a stark contrast to the way MR works
    • Use Hive for querying purposes
    Incentivized
    Chose Hadoop
    not applicable - I have not evaluated any other products
    Apache
    Chose Apache Hive
    Apache Hadoop is built on top of the Hadoop File system so it gives its best when integrated with Hadoop. Data analysis and query optimization become very easy when used with Hadoop to perform Extract transform load operations. As Hadoop is a big data system and handles large …
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Hive
    Apache Hive is a query language developed by Facebook to query over a large distributed dataset. Apache is a query engine that runs on top of HDFS, so it utilizes the resources of HDFS Hadoop setup, while Apache Spark is an in memory compute engine, and that's why [it is] much …
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Hive
    To query a huge, distributed dataset, Apache Hive was built by Facebook. Unlike Apache Hive, Apache Spark is an in-memory computation engine, which is why it is significantly quicker than Apache Hive at querying large amounts of data. In contrast to Apache HBase, Apache Hive is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Hive
    Hive and Spark have the same parent company hence they share a lot of common features. Hive follows SQL syntax while Spark has support for RDD, DataFrame API. DataFrame API supports both SQL syntax and has custom functions to perform the same functionality. Spark is faster and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Hive
    Easy to understand, well supported by the community, good documentation. However, it is possible that SAP Business Warehouse could be a good fit, too, even maybe better. I did not have the chance to try it though. We selected Apache Hive because it was far less expensive and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Hive
    [We selected Apache Hive because] It's from apache and opensource. So it's free.
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Hive
    • Faster response time and also can handle complex analytical queries
    • Can able to write custom function using python and hive
    • Able to connect using hadoop components and also using R
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Hive

    For storing bulk amount of data in a tabular manner, and where there's no need need of primary key, or just in case, if redundant data is received, it will not cause a problem. For small amounts of data, it does run MR, so beware. If your intention is to use it as a …

    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Hive
    Hive is SQL compliant which makes it easy for the data folks compared to Pig
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Hive
    Apache Pig is probably the most direct technology to compare to Hive and has several different use cases to Hive. If you want to simplify processing tasks that run using MapReduce then Apache Pig may be a better tool for the job. However if you are going to be running many …
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Hive
    We selected Hive because it supports SQL, schema and provides structure on top of hadoop. Having data structured has its benefits, especially if there are thousands of users processing on the same data over and over again. Pig provides the ability to process unstructured data. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Hive
    Presto is slightly less reliable but much faster for interactive querying. These tools would not be replacements for each other, but rather complements.
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Hive
    Apache Hive was one of the first ways to query data out of a Hadoop cluster using SQL. However, there are many other tools out there that I believe will make Apache Hive a thing of the past. I have been working with in-memory data warehouses and other technologies that do not …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    HadoopApache Hive
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (37 ratings)
    8.0
    (35 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.6
    (8 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    8.5
    (7 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.5
    (3 ratings)
    7.0
    (6 ratings)
    Online Training
    6.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    7.7
    (10 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sources
    8.7
    (10 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)