Apache Hadoop vs. Apache Pig

Apache Hadoop (and its subsequent add-ons) are well-suited to larger, unstructured data flows, such as aggregation of web traffic or advertising. Geospatial algorithms and their outputs are well-suited for this kind of aggregation as structuring that data is challenging, but leaving it unstructured and performing queries as-needed is a better fit for most business models. With the advent of data science, I would expect Hadoop fits a LOT of their initial outputs quite well.

Incentivized

Apache Pig is best suited for ETL-based data processes. It is good in performance in handling and analyzing a large amount of data. it gives faster results than any other similar tool. It is easy to implement and any user with some initial training or some prior SQL knowledge can work on it. Apache Pig is proud to have a large community base globally.

Incentivized

• HDFS is reliable and solid, and in my experience with it, there are very few problems using it
• Enterprise support from different vendors makes it easier to 'sell' inside an enterprise
• It provides High Scalability and Redundancy
• Horizontal scaling and distributed architecture

Incentivized

• Iterative Development - you can write aliases/variables, which are not immediately executed and these are stored in a DAG, which is only evaluated upon dumping or storing another alias.
• Fast execution - Works with MapReduce, Tez, or Spark execution frameworks to provide fast run times at large scales.
• Local and remote interoperability - Scripts that depend on testing a small dataset locally before moving to the full thing can simply be done with "pig -x local."

Incentivized

• Hadoop is a batch oriented processing framework, it lacks real time or stream processing.
• Hadoop's HDFS file system is not a POSIX compliant file system and does not work well with small files, especially smaller than the default block size.
• Hadoop cannot be used for running interactive jobs or analytics.

Incentivized

• May not fit every need and a SQL-like abstraction may be more effective for some tasks (look at Spark-SQL, Hive, or even an actual DBMS)
• All Pig jobs are written in a Domain Specific Language so not a lot of transferable knowledge
• Writing your own User Defined Functions (UDFS) is a nice feature but can be painful to implement in practice

Incentivized

Hadoop is organization-independent and can be used for various purposes ranging from archiving to reporting and can make use of economic, commodity hardware. There is also a lot of saving in terms of licensing costs - since most of the Hadoop ecosystem is available as open-source and is free

Great! Hadoop has an easy to use interface that mimics most other data warehouses. You can access your data via SQL and have it display in a terminal before exporting it to your business intelligence platform of choice. Of course, for smaller data sets, you can also export it to Microsoft Excel.

Incentivized

It is quick, fast and easy to implement Apache Pig which makes is quite popular to be used.

Incentivized

We went with a third party for support, i.e., consultant. Had we gone with Azure or Cloudera, we would have obtained support directly from the vendor. my rating is more on the third party we selected and doesn't reflect the overall support available for Hadoop. I think we could have done better in our selection process, however, we were trying to use an already approved vendor within our organization. There is plenty of self-help available for Hadoop online.

Incentivized

The documentation is adequate. I'm not sure how large of an external community there is for support.

Incentivized

Hadoop is a complex topic and best suited for classrom training. Online training are a waste of time and money.

I feel that this is a highly reliable and scalable solution computing technology that is highly capable of processing large data sets across multiple servers and thousands of machines in a well-defined and distributed manner. Apache Hadoop can automatically scale up the number of servers and machines that are needed to process, store, and analyze data sets. It also handles explosions in data with big data technology. Apache Hadoop is good at handling all node failures as well.

Incentivized

It takes me less time to write a Pig script than get a Spark program running for batch ETL workloads. Compared to Spark, Pig has a steeper learning curve because it employs a proprietary programming language. In one script and one fine, it can handle both Map Reduce and Hadoop. It has a large amount of documentation available to make learning more convenient.

Incentivized

• As it was open source makes it popular choice for handling large chuck of datasets
• It was free earlier but now it’s licensed but still enterprise is a fine tuned version which makes it easier for new users and administrators to use it
• Our investment is worth every single penny.
• Initial cost is more as you might need to hire administrators to setup the cluster and make them in scalable. But once done it’s pretty easy

Incentivized

• Return on Investments are significant considering what it can do with traditional analysis techniques. But, other alternatives like Apache Spark, Hive being more efficient, it is hard to stick to Apache Pig.
• It can handle large datasets pretty easily compared to SQL. But, again, alternatives are more efficient.
• While working on unstructured, decentralized dataset, Pig is highly beneficial, as it is not a complete deviation from SQL, but it does not take you in complexity MapReduce as well.

Incentivized