Apache Pig

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Pig
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Apache Pig is a programming tool for creating MapReduce programs used in Hadoop.N/A
Pricing
Apache Pig
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache Pig
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache Pig
Considered Both Products
Apache Pig
Chose Apache Pig
Apache Hadoop, Azure Data Lake Storage, Amazon EMR (Elastic MapReduce), Presto (formerly Presto DB), Confluent Platform and Alteryx
Chose Apache Pig
It takes me less time to write a Pig script than get a Spark program running for batch ETL workloads. Compared to Spark, Pig has a steeper learning curve because it employs a proprietary programming language. In one script and one fine, it can handle both Map Reduce and Hadoop. …
Chose Apache Pig
It can accommodate Map Reduce in a single script and a single fine. IT has very much documentation present for easy learning. SQL like queries makes it easy to understand
Chose Apache Pig
Apache Pig might help to start things faster at first and it was one of the best tool years back but it lacks important features that are needed in the data engineering world right now. Pig also has a steeper learning curve since it uses a proprietary language compared to Spark …
Chose Apache Pig
Pig is more focused on scripting in its own PigLatin language rather than integrate into another language like Java/Scala/Python/SQL.
However, for batch ETL workloads, I find that I can write a Pig script quicker than setting up and deploying a Spark program, for example.
Chose Apache Pig
Apache Pig is picked up quickly and can be implemented with very little coding skills. Also the other languages require exact matching of versions during installations which made them somewhat less user-friendly. Also most of the tasks that are done in map reduce can be done …
Chose Apache Pig
I use both Apache Pig and its alternatives like Apache Spark & Apache Hive. Apache Pig was one of the best options in Big Data's initial stages. But now alternatives have taken over the market, rendering Apache Pig behind in the competition. But it is still a better alternative …
Chose Apache Pig
Early on Apache Pig was a great tool for easily writing distributed processing applications without needing to write a complete Java MapReduce job from scratch, but as time as moved on there now better alternatives to get results faster for both ad-hoc analysis and for …
Chose Apache Pig
- Provided better ways for optimized hadoop jobs than Hive but not anymore.
- Spark DSL is much more advanced and compute times are significantly less.
Best Alternatives
Apache Pig
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cloudera Manager
Cloudera Manager
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Analytics Engine
IBM Analytics Engine
Score 7.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache Pig
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache Pig
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache Pig is best suited for ETL-based data processes. It is good in performance in handling and analyzing a large amount of data. it gives faster results than any other similar tool. It is easy to implement and any user with some initial training or some prior SQL knowledge can work on it. Apache Pig is proud to have a large community base globally.
Read full review
Pros
  • Iterative Development - you can write aliases/variables, which are not immediately executed and these are stored in a DAG, which is only evaluated upon dumping or storing another alias.
  • Fast execution - Works with MapReduce, Tez, or Spark execution frameworks to provide fast run times at large scales.
  • Local and remote interoperability - Scripts that depend on testing a small dataset locally before moving to the full thing can simply be done with "pig -x local."
Read full review
Cons
  • May not fit every need and a SQL-like abstraction may be more effective for some tasks (look at Spark-SQL, Hive, or even an actual DBMS)
  • All Pig jobs are written in a Domain Specific Language so not a lot of transferable knowledge
  • Writing your own User Defined Functions (UDFS) is a nice feature but can be painful to implement in practice
Read full review
Usability
It is quick, fast and easy to implement Apache Pig which makes is quite popular to be used.
Read full review
Support Rating
The documentation is adequate. I'm not sure how large of an external community there is for support.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
It takes me less time to write a Pig script than get a Spark program running for batch ETL workloads. Compared to Spark, Pig has a steeper learning curve because it employs a proprietary programming language. In one script and one fine, it can handle both Map Reduce and Hadoop. It has a large amount of documentation available to make learning more convenient.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Return on Investments are significant considering what it can do with traditional analysis techniques. But, other alternatives like Apache Spark, Hive being more efficient, it is hard to stick to Apache Pig.
  • It can handle large datasets pretty easily compared to SQL. But, again, alternatives are more efficient.
  • While working on unstructured, decentralized dataset, Pig is highly beneficial, as it is not a complete deviation from SQL, but it does not take you in complexity MapReduce as well.
Read full review
ScreenShots