Apidog vs. Jitterbit

Apidog

Apidog

0 Reviews and Ratings

Jitterbit

Jitterbit

44 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Apidog	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Apidog is a platform designed to simplify and enhance the entire API lifecycle, offering a range of features to support API design, debugging, testing, documentation, management, and collaboration. Here’s an overview of its key features: 1. API Design and Documentation Visual interface for API design: Apidog provides an interface for defining APIs in a code-less way, covering endpoints, request and response formats, data schemas, and authentication methods. It is…	$12 per month per user
Jitterbit	Score 7.0 out of 10	N/A	Jitterbit is a cloud integration technology for cloud, social or mobile apps. It provides accessibility for non-technical users, including easily creating API’s and data transformation scripts within the integrations.	$100 Starting Price Per Month

Pricing

Apidog

Jitterbit

Editions & Modules

Basic: $12
per month per user
Professional: $24
per month per user
Enterprise: $324
per year per user
Enterprise On-premises: Contact sales
per year per user

Jitterbit: $100.00
Starting Price Per Month

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Apidog	Jitterbit
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Apidog	Jitterbit
Considered Both Products	Apidog Verified User Anonymous Chose Apidog Apidog is of low cost and equip with modern features. Incentivized Helpful?	Jitterbit FD Fadi Dagher Solutions Architect Chose Jitterbit Jitterbit plays well in the general-purpose integration that can be used to integrate multiple systems and used by different departments within an Enterprise. I see it as a more basic option for Boomi that is less expensive. So if you are looking for something like Boomi, and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Jitterbit Jitterbit is completely cloud-based and offers a cleaner way to connect to SOAP API endpoints. SQL Server Integration Services has a larger ecosystem of plugin connectors by third parties (at a cost), but the downside is that you still need to use something like Visual Studio … Incentivized Helpful? LS Laura Sponaas IT Developer Architect Chose Jitterbit Scribe - we had problems with this product (jobs were running long, some jobs would finish incomplete without any warning or info, etc) and we wanted more functionality/configurability -- keep in mind this was 3 years ago, so the product may have changed since then! CozyRoc … Incentivized Helpful? LM Laura McDonough, PMP Vice-President, Business Operations & PMO Chose Jitterbit Evaluated Dell Boomi and Celigo as alternatives prior to purchasing Jitterbit. We went with Jitterbit at that time because we could handle all changes ourselves without any assistance from Jitterbit, and we liked their size and nimbleness. Dell Boomi was too big for us, and … Incentivized Helpful? RA Ravi Agarwal Director of Enterprise Architecture and DevOps Chose Jitterbit Our decision was based on the cost at the time. Jitterbit's cost model has changed since then, so it might be a different decision now if we have to re-evaluate. Incentivized Helpful? DE Dudu Elmaleh Salesforce Developer Chose Jitterbit For me, it gives the best ratio: It is the most intuitive and easy to use tool, but it still gives you a lot of options and capabilities to handle all requirements. Add to that, it has cloud agent options and has the better community of the other tools I encountered. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Jitterbit Hands down, Jitterbit is more cost-effective than Informatica, either on-prem or cloud and the value only goes up from there. Reusability and ease of creation make in-house training simple and the end result is we leverage Jitterbit for much more than what we initially … Incentivized Helpful? JS James Smith Sales & Marketing Operations Manager Chose Jitterbit I prefer Jitterbit mainly for its easy to navigate history files and the way you can map your updates. Incentivized Helpful? ES Eli Strong Customer Relationship Management (CRM) System Administrator Chose Jitterbit I actually use all three of these products: Jitterbit free, DemandTools and PeopleImport. I use DemandTools and PeopleImport most often and usually only use Jitterbit free when the other two won't launch or connect. Incentivized Helpful? AG Ankur Goswami Lead Developer Chose Jitterbit Other Products: IBM- Cast Iron, Krise. Jitterbit provides both cloud and on premise solution and pricing was also fair. Incentivized Helpful? SB Scott Boetig Salesforce Solution Architect Chose Jitterbit The Jitterbit data loader is a dramatic improvement over the standard Salesforce Apex Data Loader. Both applications are free or included with Salesforce but I would only recommend Jitterbit for users who need to run data jobs against Salesforce. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Jitterbit Initially we were looking at building our own integration capability from scratch, but deliverable timelines pushed us to purchase this product. Other than Biztalk, I do not know which other products we looked at. Helpful? TT Travis Terry Performance Testing Engineer / Front End Developer /System Analyst Chose Jitterbit Honestly we didn't evaluate too many other middle ware products, at least that i am aware of its possible our system architect did without my input. But we were given a trial of JitterBit a very good training session and decided it was a perfect fit for us and it has been a … Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Jitterbit We did not compare it with other integration tools. Helpful? MT Mike Turnell Order Management Specialist Chose Jitterbit Jitterbit works flawlessly for simple data loading tasks. Anything more complicated, such as deduping objects or cleaning data on a grid would require a more substantial program such DemandTools, but for small, ad-hoc tasks Jitterbit is hard to beat. Helpful? DW Don Waters President Chose Jitterbit Jitterbit was a better match for the project we used it for because of the depth and breadth of scripting language and the nature of the platform. That being said, the project we threw at it was a tough one. I am almost certain we could not have completed it with the other … Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Jitterbit The support that Jitterbit has provided on paper as well as in the real world is great and this was certainly in our top pick list when we did our build/buy analysis. Incentivized Helpful? JC Jules Clement Business Intelligence Team Lead Chose Jitterbit What set Jitterbit apart was the flexibility and the capability to copy existing transformations. Since we were rolling out a world-wide data integration program for an enterprise ERP, it was essential that we could implement once and reuse. We could add error captures really … Helpful?

Features

Apidog

Jitterbit

Cloud Data Integration

Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
	Apidog - Ratings	Jitterbit 7.2 Ratings 11% below category average
Pre-built connectors	00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Connector modification	00 Ratings	7.20 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration	00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Data quality services	00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Data security features	00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Monitoring console	00 Ratings	6.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Apidog	Jitterbit
Small Businesses	Amazon API Gateway Score 8.2 out of 10	Make Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Postman Score 8.8 out of 10	IBM App Connect Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises	Postman Score 8.8 out of 10	IBM App Connect Score 9.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Apidog	Jitterbit
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	7.0 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Apidog	Jitterbit
Likelihood to Recommend	API scheduling scenarios are the best, but when we need to check API scheduling for less than 1 hours, it do not provide such features. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Small to medium sized companies are great prospects for this product. It's pretty easy to set up, learn and maintain. You can scale it too, so start with an easy integration, learn the ropes and expand your usage. If you have fairly simply needs for a handful of fields and just one or two external systems to feed into Salesforce, this is the go-to product. If you're a larger company needing more complex integrations where extremely high reliability is needed and any downtime means revenue loss, you probably already have a different product in mind. Then again, you probably have an entire team that handles integrations and a data warehouse to support it! Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Login API Scheduling Exports API Scheduling Reporting Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Ease of use - while being more technical is useful, you don't need to be a developer to use many of JItterbit's capabilities Customer Support - we have always had great responsiveness to any questions or issues encountered Reliability - Jitterbit has been extremely reliable with no major outages in the recent past Incentivized Laura McDonough, PMP Vice-President, Business Operations & PMO Read full review
Cons	Schedule for half hour basis or 5 min basis Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Some of the more advanced transformation possibilities aren't exactly clear without a lot of digging. Very basic connections (e.g. map this field to this field) along with basic transformation scripts (e.g. multiply X * Y) are super easy. But I know there are a ton more features and functionality that I feel is somewhat buried in the product Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	No answers on this topic	I have been evaluating other tools as a continuous improvement practice. I would like something that would be easier to use for a non-technical user. I work for a small organization and have no back-up for Jitterbit if something happens to me. We don't have the technically savvy employees to understand it. Crystal Steinbach, MBA Digital Communications Professional Read full review
Usability	As its very user friendly and of modern UI Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	They have some of the best support of any software vendor that we use. They always get our issues resolved quickly Travis Terry Performance Testing Engineer / Front End Developer /System Analyst Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Apidog is of low cost and equip with modern features. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Hands down, Jitterbit is more cost-effective than Informatica, either on-prem or cloud and the value only goes up from there. Reusability and ease of creation make in-house training simple and the end result is we leverage Jitterbit for much more than what we initially considered it for. Having used Oracle and TIBCO before as well, I find they are the tools of yesterday, not able to keep up in terms of functionality or price. Mulesoft would be a more relevant comparison, and I feel we lean on Mule far more than Jitterbit, but both tools have their place and their strengths (and weaknesses!). Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Downtime reduction Early Issue Detection Reporting Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	We moved from a product that was failing regularly (jobs were running long, some jobs would finish incomplete without any warning or info, etc) to Jitterbit - a very stable product if you give it the recommended server size it needs. It has made crafting solutions for data movement and transformation quick! Incentivized Laura Sponaas IT Developer Architect Read full review
ScreenShots	Apidog Screenshots