Appian is a low-code development and business process management platform. It features drag-and-drop design for app building, automated work processes, unified data management, and cloud-based deployment.
$0
WEBCON BPS
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
WEBCON Business Process Suite is a comprehensive solution for Microsoft SharePoint.
The solution offers a multilingual SharePoint based interface with dedicated mobile access to tasks and documents. Its graphic process designer helps the user configure and draw business process scenarios and supports simple creation of forms and workflow steps and paths.
$0
installation
Pricing
Appian
WEBCON BPS
Editions & Modules
Appian Community Edition
$0
Application - Input-Only
$2
per month per user
Application - Infrequent
$9
per month per user
Application - Standard
$75
per month per user
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
minimum 100 users, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
unlimited
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
Minimum 100, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
Unlimited
WEBCON BPS Express
$0
installation
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Appian
WEBCON BPS
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
WEBCON BPS Express is a free edition for test and productive use up to 10 GB of database size (see starter.webcon.com)
WEBCON BPS Standard and Enterprise versions are available as perpetual, per user licenses. Pay per month model is also available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Appian
WEBCON BPS
Features
Appian
WEBCON BPS
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Appian
9.1
Ratings
8% above category average
WEBCON BPS
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform Security
9.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform User Management
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reusability
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform Scalability
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
WEBCON BPS
9.1
Ratings
11% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
WEBCON BPS
8.9
Ratings
6% above category average
Process designer
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Process simulation
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Business rules engine
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
SOA support
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Form builder
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Model execution
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Appian is well suited for the areas which involve a workflow. For Example: Consider there is a task and 3 teams are required to work on the task, with Appian we can create tasks for each team and monitor the comments and completion. Together with the integration capabilities, this tool can function in many areas. In our firm, we are using it to automate the workflows for our business teams and help them in capturing the OLA's and SLA's.
Allows at a glance workflow documentation which assists in the need we have for information readiation.
Drag and drop interface for workflow development greatly speeds our apps time to market.
Using the advanced features of Appian, we are able to create working sites in a fraction of the time it would take to do so using "traditional" development.
Search issues when type ahead and database search are used in the same field.
Buttons implementation where user is require[d] to click on the button description - if clicks on the button outside that text - button will not work.
Problems with using certain off-the-shelf performance tools like WebLoad or Neoload. That is because of different dynamic variables being used internally in Appian - which these tools are unable to correlate. We are still investigating using other tools like Jmeter to overcome dynamic correlation problem for performance testing.
We recently renewed our license with Appian. We are convinced that its flexibility, relative ease of use, the support they provide, there mobile advancements and their general willingness and desire to see us succeed all contributed to our reason to renew our agreement with Appian
There are many differences between using Appian and using other programming languages. Additionally, there are many trade offs that have to be made and that have to be accepted for using Appian. In some cases, you give up control of one small area, but in others, it may open settings that are unavailable to a developer when using other program languages.
Appian is one of the leading low code business automation platforms that support RPA, decision rules, case management, workflow automation, and machine learning all in a single bundle. But it is also harder to implement and replace the traditional business process.
As analyst I participated in a developer boot camp. At times it was hard to keep up but most of the time it made sense. Trainer took the time to explain and slowed pace down to answer questions etc.
Appian compares favorably with other vendors in the space. It is strongest with business workflow automation and to create custom business applications. The tool base for coding is extremely straightforward and allows for faster coding and deployment. Handles very complex process flows and has the ability to discover new opportunities for automation.
Our IT automated procurement process has sped up time to get paid by a few days on every transaction
Our approvals are more organized as a result of being put in digitally
Managing our own tenant requires more than we have available, given the quarterly updates
Since we have business-critical functions running in the platform, we have to thoroughly review every note of every update. Because of this we skip half of the updates since we don't have enough time to review these changes four times a year.