TrustRadius

Applexus InSITE vs. Kevel

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Applexus InSITE
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Applexus InSITE is an automated, AI-powered SAP vendor invoice processing management solution, boasting streamlined process flows using Intelligent Data Extraction with automated exception handling and approval workflows for vendor invoice payment processing. Applexus InSITE is equipped with self-learning capabilities that eliminate human intervention, manual data entry…N/A
Kevel
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Kevel's (formerly Adzerk) APIs is designed to make it easy for engineers and PMs to build their own server-side, fully-customized ad server. E-retailers and user communities can use Kevel to build ad servers to promote anything from native ads to internal content to sponsored listings (where vendors and sellers pay for their organic listing to be promoted in search and browsing results). According to the vendor, engineers reliably see a significant reduction in dev time using Kevel’s APIs…N/A
Pricing
Applexus InSITEKevel
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Applexus InSITEKevel
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$50,000 per yearNo setup fee
Additional Details—Pricing is customized based on feature needs, support needs, and monthly request volume.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Applexus InSITEKevel
Considered Both Products
Applexus InSITE

No answer on this topic

Kevel
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Kevel
Kevel was an easier initial implementation for header bidding with prebid. The team worked alongside us to make sure everything was operating as intended. We ultimately switched to Ads Manager to access AdX demand and other features that were not possible with Kevel (for …
Features
Applexus InSITEKevel
Ad Network Integration
Comparison of Ad Network Integration features of Product A and Product B
Applexus InSITE
-
Ratings
Kevel
10.0
Ratings
30% above category average
DSP integration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Ad Campaigns
Comparison of Ad Campaigns features of Product A and Product B
Applexus InSITE
-
Ratings
Kevel
10.0
Ratings
25% above category average
Ad campaign creation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Ad deployment00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Display advertising00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Ad display and retargeting segmentation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Ad Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Ad Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Applexus InSITE
-
Ratings
Kevel
9.2
Ratings
17% above category average
Ad dashboards00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Ad performance reports00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Ad conversion tracking00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Ad attribution reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Cross-channel ad management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Applexus InSITEKevel
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
LinkedIn Marketing Solutions
LinkedIn Marketing Solutions
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
The Trade Desk
The Trade Desk
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Webexpenses
Webexpenses
Score 9.2 out of 10
LinkedIn Marketing Solutions
LinkedIn Marketing Solutions
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Applexus InSITEKevel
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Applexus InSITEKevel
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
For ad serving, implementing client-side header bidding with prebid was actually easier with Kevel than it is with Google Ad Manager in most cases, particularly for display advertising. I found though that with more complex integrations (like video), there were more solutions and code snippets available with other larger ad servers (Google).
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • More personable team that can address customizations needed to the product.
  • Easy to use interface.
  • Frequent product updates with notifications via email.
  • Well documented API.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • User interface could be faster to load.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Kevel was an easier initial implementation for header bidding with prebid. The team worked alongside us to make sure everything was operating as intended. We ultimately switched to Ads Manager to access AdX demand and other features that were not possible with Kevel (for instance, EBDA). There are benefits to both but I appreciated the attention we got from Kevel support when we were first working through the implementation. We are still using Kevel for many things, just not as our primary display advertising ad server.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Kevel enabled us to get up and running with client side header bidding when our team was still small and the technology was still new. This improved our ability to monetize our inventory.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots

Applexus InSITE Screenshots

Screenshot of Audit Trail ViewScreenshot of Cockpit ViewScreenshot of Indexer View

Kevel Screenshots

Screenshot of Adzerk homepageScreenshot of Decision API JSON exampleScreenshot of Management API example