Araize FastFund Online vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FastFund Online
Score 10.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
FastFund Online from Araize is an SaaS system that integrates nonprofit, fund accounting, fund raising (CRM) and payroll in a single solution. The vendor says FastFund Online is designed to help nonprofits take control of their fiscal and development responsibilities in order to be more accountable to donors and funding sources, and be more prepared for audits. FastFund Online covers the various management responsibilities that are essential to running a successful…
$35
for 5 employees
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Pricing
Araize FastFund OnlineMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Editions & Modules
FastFund Online Payroll
$35
for 5 employees
FastFund Fundraising
$50
per month
FastFund Payroll
$55
per month
FastFund Online Premium
$110
per month
FastFund LT Bundle
$300
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FastFund OnlineMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFastFund Raising is priced based on number of constituents in the database. Pricing starts at $35 a month for up to 5,000 constituents. FastFund Payroll is priced bases on number of active employees. Pricing starts at $35 a month for up to 5 employees. Special bundle pricing is available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Araize FastFund OnlineMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Considered Both Products
FastFund Online
Chose FastFund Online
Araize FastFund was already implemented when I joined the organization so I cannot comment on how it compares to other products or why it was selected.
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
It is more powerful in features and ease of use as Microsoft GP provides an intuitive user interface leading to quicker adoption.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Xero is easier to use, closer to Quickbooks. Most of the background GL is automated, where as in GP it is not.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Due to the size of our company Microsoft Dynamics GP works better for us than Quickbooks because of the reporting capabilities. However, the NetSuite demo proved to be much more user-friendly with more reporting capabilities.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks, SAP, and Netsuite. We are a small-sized business so Dynamics GP is better for our business.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
There are more features and products overall in the Microsoft package at a better price point. Overall, Salesforce has a much sleeker and more user-friendly design.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We moved from Epicor Eagle N Series to Dynamics GP as an accounting solution for our new POS system. I believe Dynamics GP has more options to create and present financial statements for a large company with many regions and districts. However, because of the weakness of our …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
They both accomplish the same thing, I think Oracle was what I first learned and thus making the change to Microsoft Dynamics GP just took a little bit of time to learn the technology. After you get the hang of it, it becomes much easier and I taught my coworkers how to use it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I did not pick Dynamics over Salesforce, my company was using it and eventually switched over to Salesforce. I would say that Dynamics is user-friendly and the interface is quite easy to understand. I really like the reporting capabilities as well. Once again, the aesthetic …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
GP is more robust than QuickBooks bar none.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
At the time of purchase, Microsoft Dynamics GP seemed more appropriate and more in sync with the needs of our company. The software was more responsive, user-friendly and it allowed for more flexibility with the way it was intended to be used. We were also promised better …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
My recollection of Quickbooks pro isn't great, and it was over 10 years ago. Obviously many things have changed in that time frame, so any comparison would likely not be relevant.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
The only product with have shopped was Sage Intacct. It is somewhat unfair to compare the two solutions, because Sage Intacct is a cloud-based solution. That said, Intacct appears to advertise better reporting/business intelligence capabilities. MS Dynamics GP should be aware …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is one of the best ERP's for a medium or small business in the market today. When we were looking for the right software, it had already a connection developed with our 3rd party logistics system, so the decision was pretty easy since the logistic / supply …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Dynamics GP is much more flexible and enterprise-oriented than Quickbooks Pro or similar software. It can support many more users and scenarios. However it requires more dedicated infrastructure (such as servers and databases) and more dedicated IT resources to maintain and …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
I love Dayforce for payroll. It has been configured to meet all our needs, is user-friendly and the customer support is fantastic. We originally moved from MDGP payroll to Ceridian Insync payroll due to the issues we had. We upgraded to Dayforce and are very happy with the …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Learning GP with so many resources from the GP community has been easy. Someone always has the answer or suggestions to point me in the right direction. I've had very few instances where the systems caused an error that required research in order to fix the glitch.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
We looked at several general ledger software packages. We had excellent customer service and implementation guidance through a third party. Having a knowledgeable consultant is critical to a successful implementation.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Quickbooks Pro and GP are not on the same playing field. GP is a full account system adhering to GAAP, while QuickBooks is designed for the small business market. While starting out with QuickBooks is easy, if you plan to grow, you will soon outgrow it.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics is a good, easy to use product for entities that do not have advanced manufacturing.
If I were to go into a distribution or service type business I would highly recommend it.
If I were to go into an advanced manufacturing environment I would not consider GP.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
More user friendly in certain areas and much more cost effective to manage and support
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
TechSoup had great privcing, I had experince with GP in previous companys and there are a lot of staff accountants who have relevant experience.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Selected because of Intercompany workflow, consolidated reporting functionality, system controls, available modules for fixed assets and inventory. GP was the best value for the points mentioned.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Does not stack up against SAP as it does not have the level of flexibility offered by SAP. JD Edwards software was awful, no comparison.
Features
Araize FastFund OnlineMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Araize FastFund Online
8.0
Ratings
3% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
Ratings
16% below category average
Pay calculation8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reimbursement management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Araize FastFund Online
9.0
Ratings
8% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.5
Ratings
25% below category average
Role-based user permissions9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Araize FastFund Online
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
16% below category average
Standard reports8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Custom reports8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Dashboards00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Araize FastFund Online
8.0
Ratings
3% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
15% below category average
Accounts payable8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Expense management8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cash management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Time tracking00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Fixed asset management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Multi-currency support00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multi-division support00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Regulations compliance00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Self-service portal00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Localizations00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Araize FastFund Online
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
Ratings
9% below category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Araize FastFund Online
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
Ratings
8% below category average
Inventory tracking00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing module00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Araize FastFund Online
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
Ratings
14% below category average
Pricing00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Araize FastFund OnlineMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Araize FastFund OnlineMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Araize FastFund OnlineMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Likelihood to Recommend
I have found FastFund to be a flexible yet easy-to-use accounting and donor support software. Of course, it does not have all the power of something like SalesForce, but then again, I don't need that and my more technically challenged users would be overwhelmed with something like that. FastFund allows us to track donor support, issue receipts for tax purposes, and even record notes of interactions with donors. We create mailing lists and can easily allocate donations to the specific project as designated by the donor. We use FastFund for our accounting software. We pay bills, make deposits, cut checks, and allocate expenses to the appropriate projects. We also use the newest module of FastFund which is the Payroll module. I am not involved with using that module, but I do know that it is great to have everything in one package.
Read full review
It does accounting really well, it does payroll not so well. I say this because when you get into states that have complicated payroll laws like California, overtime calculations are hard to setup and get right. Same goes for other states when they do out of the normal pay structure like piece rate pay. It does HR, A/P and A/R really well and we have had no issues on that side; just payroll when it comes to certain states and how we do anything that is not salary or hourly.
Read full review
Pros
  • Cloud-based so all our employees have access to it from their various remote locations.
  • Fund-based accounting.
  • Ongoing training on updates and improvements and tech support responses are quick and useful.
Read full review
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
Cons
  • Initial use of the new payroll features had several hiccups that had to be addressed.
Read full review
  • Having an integration between Project Accounting and Field Service would be amazing! There are so many companies that have service technicians that perform work on a customer's contract but also have a need for project accounting functionality within that customer's contract. Right now those modules are separate so you either need to use one or duplicate some efforts if you need to use both.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP could do a better job documenting their new enhancements to the product. They realize great enhancements but the documentation about them, or new products, is lacking so it is difficult as a consultant to know everything a new feature can do for me and my customers.
  • They could enhance their forecasting capabilities with a new forecasting tool within Management Reporter.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We are satisfied with the software and on-going costs. Moving to something else would be an investment and cost that would be difficult to justify given our satisfaction with FastFund.
Read full review
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Usability
I find FastFund to be easy to use and, for the most part, intuitive in its user interface and options. Sometimes new features are added or updates are made which causes some changes. Araize is good at holding short webinars to introduce these.
Read full review
Overall usability of the older model is not quite so user friendly for the basic bookeeper, but at an accountants level we can generate all the necessary reports and create Sales Orders, Purchase orders and invoices - though it is a bit redundant to enter the sales and purchase orders separately instead of being able to convert a sales order directly to a puchase order by applying a price book like the newer versions can.
Read full review
Support Rating
I have always had my questions and issues responded to very quickly and addressed in a timely fashion. Araize is good at notifying us when the support desk will be closed for company holidays and the like. They are responsive to suggestions for new features and in helping when we have questions.
Read full review
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Araize FastFund was already implemented when I joined the organization so I cannot comment on how it compares to other products or why it was selected.
Read full review
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration import/export. D365 F&O is a huge implementation cost, and without a direct migration path every bit of data has to be custom imported. There really is no straightforward way to stack up GP against these programs currently. Again, the future of GP is in some doubt.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Our main users are in three different physical locations and Araize FastFund has allowed each user to easily have access to what they need.
Read full review
  • If implemented properly, the product can save many hours of data entry time - specifically by setting up integrations of large data sets.
  • Many times the underlying business process must be adjusted to accommodate software limitations. By being flexible, a company can leverage their users' skills in combination with GP to make data entry faster and more efficient. I have seen many companies eliminate the need for data entry personnel as well as reallocate employee hours to more skilled positions such as reporting and analytics.
  • Poor implementations, on the other hand, can cause employees to hate their jobs and the software. This isn't specific to GP but to the software industry in general.
Read full review
ScreenShots

FastFund Online Screenshots

Screenshot of Accounting Transaction EntryScreenshot of Fund Raising Gift EntryScreenshot of Payroll Journal