Archibus by Eptura vs. ServiceChannel

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Archibus
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
Archibus is an IWMS solution based on the IWMS capabilities of the former ARCHIBUS product line and the workspace planning and optimization solutions of the former Serraview, which merged with ARCHIBUS in December 2018.N/A
ServiceChannel
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ServiceChannel provides facilities managers with a single platform to source, procure, manage, and pay for repair and maintenance services from commercial contractors across their enterprise. The company aims to deliver transparency and data-driven analytics of service quality, across all trades, locations, and contractors, allowing facilities managers drive significant brand equity and ROI for their organizations without outsourcing or investing in new infrastructure. …N/A
Pricing
Archibus by EpturaServiceChannel
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ArchibusServiceChannel
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Archibus by EpturaServiceChannel
Considered Both Products
Archibus
Chose Archibus
Better management integration from users and administrators. Archibus is still much better for multiple building management. It’s ability to overlay and activate specific spaces on a floor plan makes it very easy to visualize.
Chose Archibus
Archibus compares well with other IWMS software when it comes to integrating with BIM models and reporting capabilities. I selected Archibus as it has all the tools and processes needed to manage space and moves, with the intention to expand to other modules like Lease …
ServiceChannel
Chose ServiceChannel
Service Channel bridged the gap for us to issue work orders directly to vendors. Maximo Asset Management did not have a user-friendly way for us to do what Service Channel does on the vendor side. Also, at the time of our selection, Maximo was missing the site portal but has …
Chose ServiceChannel
In the past, I have used IPT, but they are not around anymore or were bought out. This has more functions and is more user friendly than IPT. This one allows you to customize certain items, so you can have the system work better for you than against you.
Chose ServiceChannel
Work Oasis and FM are both terrible and slow, no current features, no flexibility and no new additions or enhancements being worked on.

SC was and is the Cadillac of them all, I simply showed my VP how slow and old the other system was, and discussed how many options and ability …
Chose ServiceChannel
The only other experience I have with platforms such as SC is during my time at Starbucks. They created an in house work order system that was very detailed and cumbersome to work around. The good news is that once I learned Sbux's system all other systems are a piece of …
Chose ServiceChannel
There are other companies that have portions they focus on but ServiceChannel is the total package.
Best Alternatives
Archibus by EpturaServiceChannel
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Archibus by EpturaServiceChannel
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Archibus by EpturaServiceChannel
Likelihood to Recommend
It’s best suited for Large multi-building configurations (campus) with self-service funtions. There are better options for single buildings. This tool really shines when you are managing multiple buildings that are accessed by the same users.
Read full review
ServiceChannel is well suited for companies that have multiple locations or a few very large buildings. In my experience the system allows one person to manage 150 to 200 small retail locations but when you add restaurants and buildings with lots of equipment then it gets more complex and the number of locations that one person can effectively manage is greatly reduced. You can effectively manager 50 or 30,000+ locations with this system if you have the personal. There are several free or cost-effective programs available if you are only looking to manage a dozen or so locations.
Read full review
Pros
  • Reporting - Archibus has very powerful reporting solutions.
  • Expansive Modules - catered to every need of the real estate and facilities organization.
  • Editing and inputting data.
Read full review
  • Up to the minute updates, so when you go to look up a work order, it is live with the most recent notes from vendor, office, etc.
  • File retention - it keeps all WOs so you can go back and research previous issues for investigating, asking questions of the vendor, etc.
  • Asset Tagging - it allows you to track all of your assets
Read full review
Cons
  • More user friendly booking system
  • Web navigation can be more streamlined
  • Ease of use from non-technical users can be improved
Read full review
  • This system will always require someone to actively be available to convert proposals. There are still delays depending on the human element of the process.
  • Lots of features and some are not always intuitive.
  • Integration to the current procedure would be nice. Seems this requires the addition of a new system through this Service Channel application/Website. If it were to integrate to current offerings such as SalesForce it may be helpful.
Read full review
Usability
User perspective it is simple through a web portal that shows all spaces and buildings. But as an administrator it was quite a bit of work to set up. And by extension updating is also a lot of work
Read full review
I gave it a high rating because it's an easy to use platform.
  • It walks you step by step to goal accomplishment
  • It doesn't drown you in tech speak or unnecessary steps
  • It appears to be created by the busy facilities manager that just needs the good stuff with no fluff.
  • Not to be rude but if a facilities manager can't function in SC easily they may not be in the right field.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Sue Thomas is the reason...
  • If a vendor has a template to upload I can ask for her support and it's done.
  • If I need immediate data for a meeting and I'm away from my computer she can grab it for me on the fly.
  • I've walked out of meetings looking like a stud based on the foreground work Sue did to prepare me.
  • If there is a technical issues she will find a work around for me so I can focus on my job not my admin work.
  • Clear and timely communication on every and all open issues.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
When we implemented SC it was many years ago and the system was different. I cannot speak to implementing it currently.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Archibus compares well with other IWMS software when it comes to integrating with BIM models and reporting capabilities. I selected Archibus as it has all the tools and processes needed to manage space and moves, with the intention to expand to other modules like Lease Administration and Asset Management. The constant upgrades to Archibus also helps to keep the software up-to-date with other third party products such as Revit.
Read full review
The only other experience I have with platforms such as SC is during my time at Starbucks. They created an in house work order system that was very detailed and cumbersome to work around. The good news is that once I learned Sbux's system all other systems are a piece of cake. I was able to manipulate SC within hours of working on it
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Met our business objectives
  • Positive ROI
Read full review
  • ServiceChannel has allowed me to manage my vendors in a more efficient manner by providing scorecards which in return allows me to provide the best service to my field team.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ServiceChannel Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of