Array SSL VPN vs. Cisco Meraki vMX

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Array SSL VPN
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Access Direct from Array Networks in Milpitas, California presents an SSL VPN solution.N/A
Cisco Meraki vMX
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Cisco's Meraki Virtual MX (vMX) is a virtual instance of a Meraki security & SD-WAN appliance, dedicated specifically to providing the simple configuration benefits of site-to-site Auto VPN for customers running or migrating IT services to an Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure Virtual Private Cloud (VPC).N/A
Pricing
Array SSL VPNCisco Meraki vMX
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Array SSL VPNCisco Meraki vMX
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Array SSL VPNCisco Meraki vMX
Considered Both Products
Array SSL VPN

No answer on this topic

Cisco Meraki vMX
Chose Cisco Meraki vMX
In terms of the Cisco suite, we also have Cisco WebEx calling IP deck solution right out across our centers. That has proven to be phenomenal in terms of performance and stability. With that alone, we've cut back our incident rate of telephony related issues by half …
Chose Cisco Meraki vMX
The VMware SD wan does give some better WAN metrics, but the interface is super clunky and doesn’t support a full stack. If Meraki could give some more QoE link metrics, it would be perfect.
Chose Cisco Meraki vMX
Cisco Meraki vMX is great for small to medium businesses. It is easy to use with little out-of-the-box configuration. There is an easier learning curve on the Cisco Meraki vMX than on the SonicWall devices. We went with the Cisco Meraki vMX because we had the physical …
Chose Cisco Meraki vMX
Meraki vMX is the most simple and intuitive platform to implement. It does though miss some security features that you get in Checkpoint CloudGuard og Palo Alto Next Generation firewalls.
Chose Cisco Meraki vMX
Cisco Meraki vMX is fantastic. The only downside is cost. Licensing really is a crutch here.
Chose Cisco Meraki vMX
SD-WAN AutoVPN and price.
Chose Cisco Meraki vMX
I've used the FortiGate VM appliance many times and this was much better to use, it was a full feature set and had no setbacks ever. But people use Meraki for different reasons likely so it's not 100% apples to apples. As an SR engineer, I demand deep feature sets, etc, while …
Features
Array SSL VPNCisco Meraki vMX
Virtual Private Network
Comparison of Virtual Private Network features of Product A and Product B
Array SSL VPN
-
Ratings
Cisco Meraki vMX
8.7
Ratings
4% below category average
AES 256-bit Encryption00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Kill Switch00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multi-Platform Support00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Split Tunneling00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
IP Address Masking00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
No-Logs Policy00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Multiple Server Locations00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Simultaneous Connections00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Customer Support Services00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Array SSL VPNCisco Meraki vMX
Small Businesses
Norton 360
Norton 360
Score 7.0 out of 10
Norton 360
Norton 360
Score 7.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Array SSL VPNCisco Meraki vMX
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Array SSL VPNCisco Meraki vMX
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
We are a heavily invested Meraki environment, from our corporate locations to APs. Using a vMX as apposed another solution is a no brainer. It integrates well, has the same benefits as the rest of the Meraki stack, and you can leverage your favorite cloud platform
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Stability: Using Cisco Meraki vMX with auto-VPN instead of non-Meraki peers toward Azure
  • Management: Easy to manage on the Cisco Meraki vMX Dashboard
  • Centralization: With Cisco Meraki vMX, we can centralize/ standardize our setups
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • some organizations may require more throughput than what vMX-L can offer
  • there are almost no security controls as the vMX is in VPN concentrator mode
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
In terms of the Cisco suite, we also have Cisco Webex Calling IP deck solution right out across our centers. That has proven to be phenomenal in terms of performance and stability. With that alone, we've cut back our incident rate of telephony related issues by half essentially, which used to be our top rated issue previously. So the WebEx IP deck solution would be another product I would recommend.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We have over 350 locations and growing. We chose Cisco Meraki vMX because of ease of use and how it scales.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • The speed of configuration is shortened due to it being under one portal
  • Support has saved time during outages by quickly fixing issues
  • Site-to-site VPNs are easy and fast to set up when swapping our equipment
Read full review
ScreenShots