TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Atlassian Bitbucket vs. Azure DevOps Server

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Bitbucket

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/ABitbucket is a Git repository and code collaboration platform, featuring automated testing and code deployment. Bitbucket Cloud Premium provides AI-powered development, more granular access controls, and enforced code quality, and Bitbucket Data Center provides a self-hosted option.

    $0

    Azure DevOps Server

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AAzureDevOps Server (formerly Team Foundation Server, or TFS) is a test management and application lifecycle management tool, from Microsoft's Visual Studio offerings. To license Azure DevOps Server an Azure DevOps license and a Windows operating system license (e.g. Windows Server) for each machine running Azure DevOps Server.N/A
    Pricing
    BitbucketAzure DevOps Server
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0
    for up to 5 users
    Standard
    $3.30
    per month per user
    Premium
    $6.60
    per month per user
    Bitbucket Data Center
    starting at $44,000
    per year 1 - 500
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BitbucketAzure DevOps Server
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    BitbucketAzure DevOps Server
    Considered Both Products
    Atlassian
    Chose Bitbucket
    The majority of SCM tools are Git based. What makes this solution stand out from the rest is it's web-based interface, which implements version control standards very intuitively. As a result, the learning curve shortens and productivity is highly improved.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bitbucket
    Bitbucket was inherited from an acquisition and not used by choice. The acquired company chose Bitbucket because - at the time - they were the market leader for private source code repositories and the team was already using JIRA.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bitbucket
    The primary reasons we went with Bitbucket over TFS and/or other options are as follows: 1) Ability to integrate with other documentation and development tools we were using. 2) Cost - with our size and current business needs, we were able to implement what we needed in …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bitbucket
    Drastically simpler both in pricing and ease of use than the competition. For only $10/month your team has unlimited private repos! That is an outright bargain! If you are a small team that doesn't require all of the advanced services that come with larger infrastructure and …
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    Chose Azure DevOps Server
    Azure DevOps is a fully integrated solution that solves all of the problems that our separate tools did in a much easier-to-use way. Before we implemented DevOps we had three different solutions that we had to integrate with each other and required a lot of manual intervention …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure DevOps Server
    • Better bug and user story tracking feature.
    • Easy integration with multiple version controls and code repo like- GitHub and Bitbucket.
    • Managing ticket lifecycle is quite good, able to easily move through different stages.
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure DevOps Server
    The advantage of Team Foundation Server is the integration capability with Microsoft technologies and products, such as Visual Studio. Although this is an important consideration, Team Foundation Server is not a straightforward tool and needs to be improved to work seamlessly …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure DevOps Server
    The JIRA integration with Bitbucket is a little nicer for sure, since they're both Atlassian products. Still, the Visual Studio and Azure integration with TFS made this a no-brainer for me.

    Price-wise they are similar but you get a lot more with your TFS subscription. For the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure DevOps Server
    Based on the fact we are Microsoft shop, it makes sense and it has an great integration to RM for code release. At the time it was the best decision for what we needed as a team. If it were up to me, moving to Git would be the right direction. It is less costly and it is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Azure DevOps Server
    I would prefer GitHub or bitbucket.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    BitbucketAzure DevOps Server
    Version Control Software Features
    Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Atlassian Bitbucket and Azure DevOps Server
    Feature
    Atlassian Bitbucket
    8.2
    3 Ratings
    Azure DevOps Server
    -
    Ratings
    Branching and Merging9.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Version History9.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Version Control Collaboration Tools9.63 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pull Requests9.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Code Review Tools4.22 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Access Control9.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Testing Integration4.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue Tracking Integration8.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Branch Protection8.72 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    BitbucketAzure DevOps Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (66 ratings)
    9.0
    (48 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.5
    (4 ratings)
    6.0
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.3
    (14 ratings)
    8.4
    (10 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)