Lyris LM is unusual in that it is only available as an on-premise version. It is an enterprise platform and is used by some large brands.
Lyris was acquired by Aurea, and the product rebranded as Aurea List Manager.
N/A
GetResponse
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
GetResponse is an online marketing platform optimized for use by small businesses. It provides tools which support email marketing, autofunnel, landing pages, marketing automation, webinars, autoresponders, and enterprise marketing needs.
$0
per month Up to 500 contacts
Pricing
Aurea List Manager
GetResponse
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
FREE
$0
per month Up to 500 contacts
Email Marketing
$19
per month Up to 1,000 contacts
Marketing Automation
$59
per month Up to 1,000 contacts
Ecommerce Marketing
$119
per month Up to 1,000 contacts
MAX and MAX²
Custom (contact sales)
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aurea LM
GetResponse
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aurea List Manager
GetResponse
Considered Both Products
Aurea LM
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Aurea LM
Templates: from experience with other programs you have no control over the templates, and it's difficult to create your own. LM has the ability to send big files and attachments, those other programs limit sending size. LM has excellent reports, there are limits with the …
We selected Lyris LM based on cost, the fact that we can create custom reports and the way that they handle bounced emails just to name a few, It is easy to use and we have control of who can and cannot use. With a virtual list I can create a list or take a list down at any …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Aurea LM
I have begun evaluating other systems. Our version of Lyris is outdated and not providing the marketing results I need day-to-day. I have had the opportunity to trial run SubscriberMail, which has been fantastic.
GetResponse
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose GetResponse
We selected GetResponse basis a feature-to-feature comparison and also an overall recommendation from a leading digital marketer
Over the years we have worked with quite a few email platforms. We feel that GetResponse is a solid competitor. The CRM side is not as strong as a product like Keep but we don't expect it to be. If we are really being fair and comparing apples to apples, then GetResponse is as …
GetResponse was the perfect tool for the size of our company. We checked out other tools and GetResponse had the best integration and capabilities in comparison to other competitors.
Mailchimp is the best alternative to GetResponse but GetResponse's innovative design makes them better compared to. What I like more on GetResponse is it helps us to work from any device from anywhere and carry out a campaign from one device to another device. Mailchimp offers …
GetResponse is much stronger in lead management and versatility than an ESP like MailChimp or SFMC. It isn't as versatile as HubSpot or Marketo and leaves a lot lacking in landing pages and scalability.
My team has switched to GetResponse from MailChimp as it: - has more features that can be used - the ability to create flows and automations is a valuable feature
Mailchimp is more basic but is free. Infusionsoft is more expensive but more complex - I have seen it dubbed "confusionsoft", but I have not tried it to confirm as it is out of our price range. GetResponse seems to have been a happy medium for us as it provides the services we …
Not the top of the heap and certainly far from the bottom. GR is arguably one of the best solutions for Home based or small shops. It is out of the box whereas some of the others are not as complete or more difficult to unpack. It lacks some features but over-delivers on others.
Automational was discontinued. Customer service was much better with GetResponse than with Agile. Agile's customer service was very bad - made me feel inadequate, They treated me like a new customer even though I had been doing email marketing for over ten years. They severely …
GetResponse shares a lot of the same capabilities as ActiveCampaign and Infusionsoft. It's much cheaper than Infusionsoft and has a much easier interface than ActiveCampaign. It also offers a significant upgrade in feature set to MailChimp and Constant Contact who really …
GetResponse worked great for the company's direct email needs with list segmenting, A/B testing, and reporting. I personally did not get to select the email tools used for the company, but it was effective and educational to newcomers with the tool.
I would say GetResponse is the perfect product for somebody who is new and looking for quality. Most alternatives are specialized for different types of mailing. So if one ESP doesn't work, another one will. SendInBlue for example is better suited for higher volume mailing but …
Mail Chimp and Icontact. GetResponse is easy to use and less complicated than the other platforms. I prefer Get Response to any other platform I have used because it gives me all the tools to get my clients and customers to pay attention. Other Platforms don't compare to …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose GetResponse
Prior to this we used iContact which was horrible and emails were not getting delivered and going into Spam. It was recommended by a co-worker who mentioned we used it before so we decided to adopt it again.
Features
Aurea List Manager
GetResponse
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Aurea List Manager
7.4
Ratings
7% below category average
GetResponse
8.9
Ratings
16% above category average
WYSIWYG email editor
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Dynamic content
6.20 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
6.20 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Landing pages
7.90 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
A/B testing
10.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
6.20 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
List management
8.10 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
8.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Aurea List Manager
7.1
Ratings
8% below category average
GetResponse
9.7
Ratings
28% above category average
Dashboards
7.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.10 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Aurea List Manager
-
Ratings
GetResponse
9.0
Ratings
14% above category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Aurea List Manager
-
Ratings
GetResponse
9.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Event/webinar marketing
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Aurea List Manager
-
Ratings
GetResponse
9.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Social profile integration
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
It's a good fit for companies that have several departments that need separate mailing lists under the same domain. LM is an excellent Discussion List Medium: plenty of features (all open to customization), has searchable archives and easy for members to use. No drop and drag features, does not look up-to-date considering what it can do. Template creation can be a pain. It does do marketing, Unit Price, Quantity, Product/SKU#, Interest Stage and Interest Points. You can use a purchasing script or shopping cart application can then dynamically update these variables with information about the customer's purchase, which then is sent to LM However it takes some effort to set this up.
GetResponse is good for marketing automation newbies that want a powerful platform without a steep learning curve. It appears to have a strong set of tools for creating automated sequences, but it's not your solution for large enterprise usage. Also, seeing as how competitive the market's become, while it's not expensive per se, it is a bit on the pricey side relative to some.
HTML Editor and built in templates. Would be nice if they added up to date templates for responsive design. It's easy to create a responsive design template but it has to be made in a different program, copied and pasted into the editor.
Ideally with API you can integrate LM with any other programs. Too many competing programs have this all ready done so the end user can use it immediately.
We will most likely not use Lyris LM for much longer. We have recently been offered to utilize a different software that better meets our needs, is current, user friendly, and has fantastic reporting capabilities.
As I mentioned before. I believe that the platform is easy to use. Simple and easy process from start to finish. Email efficient and get to the client quickly. Catch errors that would prevent getting to where i need it to go. Overall great experience and would renew without question
We selected Lyris LM based on cost, the fact that we can create custom reports and the way that they handle bounced emails just to name a few, It is easy to use and we have control of who can and cannot use. With a virtual list I can create a list or take a list down at any given time without filling out a form or contact with my provider and my list looks as if it is coming from my own server @museum.com.
Over the years we have worked with quite a few email platforms. We feel that GetResponse is a solid competitor. The CRM side is not as strong as a product like Keep but we don't expect it to be. If we are really being fair and comparing apples to apples, then GetResponse is as good as any of these other products. Especially in the area of the visual builder, I honestly think it is just about as good as Keep. And it is better than some of these other products. Again, keeping in mind the cost and the niche GetResponse fills, it stacks up very well against the other products we have used.
Our marketing emails have been much more professional, scheduled, beautiful, and manageable since switching AWAY from GetResponse, so in that sense the platform did not provide the kind of ROI we'd prefer.
For delivering our regular daily newsletter, GetResponse has served us well and has delivered at an above-average rate to our mailing list.