Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro (formerly BIM360) is a construction software for project managers, site managers, and Building Information Modelling (BIM) managers. It is designed to connect the office and site components of construction, providing cloud-based access to plans and models.
$480
per user/per year
SAPPHIRE Structure
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
MiTek offers SAPPHIRE Structure, a structural modeling, editing, and estimation tool for builders.
N/A
Pricing
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
SAPPHIRE Structure
Editions & Modules
Autodesk Bim 360
$480.00
per user/per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
SAPPHIRE Structure
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
SAPPHIRE Structure
Features
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
SAPPHIRE Structure
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.0
Ratings
18% below category average
SAPPHIRE Structure
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.3
Ratings
19% below category average
SAPPHIRE Structure
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Dashboards
4.50 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.30 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.10 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Data exportability
7.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.9
Ratings
9% below category average
SAPPHIRE Structure
9.6
Ratings
24% above category average
Plan distribution & viewing
9.90 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
10.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
5.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
4.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
4.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
9.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
As-built drawings
4.60 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Mobile app
3.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Submittal design and management
6.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Checklists
4.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specifications
5.50 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Change orders
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
It is very efficient to set up projects using configurable templates for files, issues, and roles. Data management is easy to be understood by many users. As we have multiple users that are located in different areas in the world, it allows managing multi-discipline teams in only one environment. Clash analysis on shared models saves us time too.
In our organisation, we are 10 designers working with sapphire. We are able to design multiple units of building without any problems. The learning curve is not small but when you start to master the software, it is incredible. The precision of this software is amazing. If needed, you can easily share your file with a coworker if you need helps...
Bim360 is extremely unintuitive and frequently confusing to end users.
There are multiple avenues of sharing and collaboration for models and information. The advantages/disadvantages of each and how to perform even the most basic of tasks requires extensive training and mentoring for even the most advanced of users.
There are many enormous limitations and constraints to BIM 360 that are not immediately obvious and even contrary to published marketing materials and even product naming.
Development cycles of the product are seemingly monthly, but incredibly minor. This makes the desperately-needed and glaringly obvious massive usability, capability, and performance improvements into deal-breakers and hair pulling events. Change cannot come fast enough.
There are no integrations into Microsoft's Azure AD SSO or other 3rd party SSOs available for SMBs. This makes the provided MFA a huge headache for all SMBs.
There are no integrations into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for SharePoint/OneDrive or Outlook. This is desperately needed for most organizations using Bim360.
It's not very difficult to use for majority of all our users. We really like storing and managing all our project data in one location so users have only one option to access the requested information. Managing our architectural engineering projects with two workflows in one system is really a good asset
AutoDesk support is slow and if you are not an enterprise customer they will likely tell you to go to forums and post for help pushing the support on the high-level end-users (some of which are AutoDesk employees). I haven't actually had issues requiring support with docs altough there are some features I wish it had
Personally I prefer Procore for reviewing submittals and other documentation for LEED purposes only because that platform holds more of the information we are looking for like drawings as well, all in one place. Newforma has been used from time to time, but Autodesk is preffered to that because of its straightforward nature. Overall, we use the platform that our projects are already using, but they do make a small difference in the time and effectiveness of which we are able to do our job as consultants.
SAPPHIRE is way more complete and precise than EzCad. You can't just draw a bunch of lines and make it works( even if in reality it doesn't work). Your work needs to make sense in order to design it. If you make mistakes the software will tell you and you will need to correct your mistakes.