Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro vs. SAPPHIRE Structure

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro (formerly BIM360) is a construction software for project managers, site managers, and Building Information Modelling (BIM) managers. It is designed to connect the office and site components of construction, providing cloud-based access to plans and models.
$480
per user/per year
SAPPHIRE Structure
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
MiTek offers SAPPHIRE Structure, a structural modeling, editing, and estimation tool for builders.N/A
Pricing
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProSAPPHIRE Structure
Editions & Modules
Autodesk Bim 360
$480.00
per user/per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProSAPPHIRE Structure
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProSAPPHIRE Structure
Features
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProSAPPHIRE Structure
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.0
Ratings
18% below category average
SAPPHIRE Structure
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.3
Ratings
19% below category average
SAPPHIRE Structure
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Dashboards4.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Standard reports6.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Custom reports7.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Data exportability7.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.9
Ratings
9% below category average
SAPPHIRE Structure
9.6
Ratings
24% above category average
Plan distribution & viewing9.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation5.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports4.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
As-built drawings4.60 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mobile app3.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Submittal design and management6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Checklists4.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications5.50 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Change orders8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
4.4
Ratings
58% below category average
SAPPHIRE Structure
9.5
Ratings
17% above category average
Takeoff tools4.60 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Job costing3.70 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Cost databases8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Cost calculator2.70 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Bid creation3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Ratings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProSAPPHIRE Structure
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProSAPPHIRE Structure
Likelihood to Recommend
It is very efficient to set up projects using configurable templates for files, issues, and roles. Data management is easy to be understood by many users. As we have multiple users that are located in different areas in the world, it allows managing multi-discipline teams in only one environment. Clash analysis on shared models saves us time too.
Read full review
In our organisation, we are 10 designers working with sapphire. We are able to design multiple units of building without any problems. The learning curve is not small but when you start to master the software, it is incredible. The precision of this software is amazing. If needed, you can easily share your file with a coworker if you need helps...
Read full review
Pros
  • Live updates between design teams. This keeps the team up to date for quicker design and frees up personnel from having to do file transfers.
  • The cloud-based platform gives your company a little bit of a break on computer requirements.
  • Allows multiple offices and/or cloud-based consultants to collaborate on a design as if they are one office or one company.
Read full review
  • Automatically generating different elements to save time.
  • Designing and calculating elements.
  • Providing a clear material listing.
Read full review
Cons
  • Bim360 is extremely unintuitive and frequently confusing to end users.
  • There are multiple avenues of sharing and collaboration for models and information. The advantages/disadvantages of each and how to perform even the most basic of tasks requires extensive training and mentoring for even the most advanced of users.
  • There are many enormous limitations and constraints to BIM 360 that are not immediately obvious and even contrary to published marketing materials and even product naming.
  • Development cycles of the product are seemingly monthly, but incredibly minor. This makes the desperately-needed and glaringly obvious massive usability, capability, and performance improvements into deal-breakers and hair pulling events. Change cannot come fast enough.
  • There are no integrations into Microsoft's Azure AD SSO or other 3rd party SSOs available for SMBs. This makes the provided MFA a huge headache for all SMBs.
  • There are no integrations into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for SharePoint/OneDrive or Outlook. This is desperately needed for most organizations using Bim360.
Read full review
  • Not friendly user
  • Maybe providing to many options to do one thing.
  • Big Learning curve if you want to to big buildings.
Read full review
Usability
It's not very difficult to use for majority of all our users. We really like storing and managing all our project data in one location so users have only one option to access the requested information. Managing our architectural engineering projects with two workflows in one system is really a good asset
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
AutoDesk support is slow and if you are not an enterprise customer they will likely tell you to go to forums and post for help pushing the support on the high-level end-users (some of which are AutoDesk employees). I haven't actually had issues requiring support with docs altough there are some features I wish it had
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Personally I prefer Procore for reviewing submittals and other documentation for LEED purposes only because that platform holds more of the information we are looking for like drawings as well, all in one place. Newforma has been used from time to time, but Autodesk is preffered to that because of its straightforward nature. Overall, we use the platform that our projects are already using, but they do make a small difference in the time and effectiveness of which we are able to do our job as consultants.
Read full review
SAPPHIRE is way more complete and precise than EzCad. You can't just draw a bunch of lines and make it works( even if in reality it doesn't work). Your work needs to make sense in order to design it. If you make mistakes the software will tell you and you will need to correct your mistakes.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Well, I would say it's helpful for me to exchange different models with different specifications.
  • Number of people can work and also characterized models based on its modelling.
  • Even if a number of people are working, none of the models get disturbed, which is one of the most important points of BIM.
Read full review
  • Faster turn around time
  • More precise than ever
  • Great data exportation
Read full review
ScreenShots