TrustRadius

Autostub vs. LoadComplete

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Autostub
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
AutoStub™ is a tool to accelerate API development, designed to reduce build time by designing, prototyping, documenting and testing APIs . It creates a functional mock that allows developers or prospective users to work with the API before it’s fully implemented. Autostub allows developers to mock web services, helping developers of applications that depend on APIs to speed development and improve quality by facilitating functional testing. Key Features · …N/A
LoadComplete
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.
$239
per month 100 virtual users
Pricing
AutostubLoadComplete
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Subscription Starter
$239
per month 100 virtual users
On-demand Starter
$287
one-time fee 100 virtual users
Subscription Pro
$699
per month 1000 virtual users
On-demand Pro
$887
one-time fee 1000 virtual users
Subscription Premium
$899
per month 2500 virtual users
On-demand Premium
$1,139
one-time fee 2500 virtual users
Enterprise
Let's chat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AutostubLoadComplete
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—On-demand plans contain a $4.99 monthly maintenance fee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AutostubLoadComplete
Features
AutostubLoadComplete
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
Autostub
-
Ratings
LoadComplete
8.2
Ratings
3% below category average
End to end performance management00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Integrated performance data00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Real time monitoring00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
User Ratings
AutostubLoadComplete
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AutostubLoadComplete
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
If we already use TestComplete for test automation and there is an urgent need to perform load testing, then it is easy to start with LoadComplete but the tool itself has to improve a lot and support customization to suit our needs. I would say if load testing is the main criteria to use this tool, then there are other open-source tools like JMeter that can support better than this. Of course, as it is an enterprise tool it has very good reporting and record and playback options that I see as an advantage for basic users.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Smart built-in data correlation. Automatically helps to correlate different dynamic parameters like user session ids, authorization tokens, db-identifiers and so on. Works very fast and save your time for test development.
  • Record & Play feature - LoadComplete can record application servers' metrics like CPU and memory usage.
Yury Vakhatov | TrustRadius Reviewer
Yury Vakhatov
Test Automation Engineer
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Some of the cons of LoadComplete are that it gets slow when the size of the test increases. Also, the coding is not possible with LoadComplete.
  • Moreover, it needs to support flexibility for a framework that can be customized based on the needs. Also, some graphs remain empty which is confusing for me as a user and I would like a description of why a certain graph cannot gather data.
Kate Woodward | TrustRadius Reviewer
Kate Woodward
Marketing Project Manager
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Usability is really good because being an enterprise tool that might be an easy option to convince users to try this tool. It has a lot of easy-to-use, cool options.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Customer support is good. If any concerns are raised, they are usually resolved soon, but when questioned about a feature LoadComplete does not support, it usually takes more time to resolve.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
It is one of the best platforms. LoadComplete is all over a jack of many traits. It provides us a detailed report to our system analytics as well as developers. Moreover, there is also a smart built-in data correlation in LoadComplete which helps to correlate different parameters like user session IDs, authorization tokens, and so on. Other than that, LoadComplete also has the ability to run tests in the cloud.
Kate Woodward | TrustRadius Reviewer
Kate Woodward
Marketing Project Manager
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Negative: Licensing fees are too expensive.
  • Positive: Able to generate and present reports, Able to show developers where bottleneck shows up.
  • Positive: Easy to understand software to train new users.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots

Autostub Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of