Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM) vs. SecurID

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM)
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM), from Motorola Solutions company Avigilon, is a physical access control system for enterprise-class installations, designed to protect people, property and assets. With advanced alarm and identity management, ACM™ provides control of access to facilities. It is a browser-based solution, and its unification with Avigilon Control Center (ACC) video management software offers an end-to-end security solution to monitor and secure sites.N/A
SecurID
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
SecurID, a company and solution suite from RSA, is an identity and access management suite supporting access management, authentication, and identity governance.
$2
per year per user
Pricing
Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM)SecurID
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Cloud
$2
per year per user
Cloud Plus
$4
per year per user
Cloud Premier
$6
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM)SecurID
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM)SecurID
Considered Both Products
Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM)
Chose Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM)
Some systems out there are not too granular. They also lacked integration with Google, which we need. With that being said ACM can sometimes make setup too complicated. Double-tap cards for instance take many steps to set up. In other systems it's a one-click setup. ACM is also …
SecurID
Chose SecurID
SecurID works with more software/devices than Azure MFA. It also seems to work more smoothly for end-users compared to some of the other options out there. We have not had issues with this app not working and is very reliable/stable. It also allows token codes to be …
Chose SecurID
Overall MS AAD is good but we have had a few too many reliability issues with the product that have lead to enterprise authentication outages over the last year. The Senior executives have a preference on Securid to be more reliable than MS AAD. SecurID does a better job in …
Chose SecurID
SecurID is simple and inexpensive. It does what is needed of it, without a lot of bells and whistles. It was the most cost effective solution for our organization, and provided us quick return on our investment with minimal work.
Chose SecurID
RSA is an industry-standard and most users are comfortable with the process and use of the items. GA offers a phone-based platform and a user-based setup. However, there is some reluctance to use.
Chose SecurID
We use Entrust IdentifyGuard in a separate environment. While Entrust Identity Guard is a great solution, the scalability of RSA was the reason we chose this product.
Chose SecurID
And also Google Authenticator that TrustRadius does not have on their database. Both are good but not excellent. SecureID felt like the best option because it is solid and has proven to be the best option for more than 20 years. The other options were confusing and offer things …
Chose SecurID
RSA SecurID is in a different space than Okta and Ping Identity. In our experience RSA SecurID will protect on site networks and endpoints with RSA advanced authentication. They used two factor authentication to assure auditors and network admins that users that are logging in …
Chose SecurID
RSA is good for agent-based and RADIUS integration but the move is toward better integration with web-based (API/TLS) integration. RSA has a new product to support this integration but RSA SecureID does not offer this and is antiquated technology but still has it's placed in an …
Chose SecurID
RSA SecurID and Azure Multi-factor authentication both integrate with authentication on multiple operating systems and SaaS providers. RSA SecurID seems to integrate (at least while I have used it), with more software solutions than Azure Multi-factor authentication though.
Chose SecurID
RSA SecureID is still widely deployed and the de facto industry standard for 2nd factor authentication. Microsoft Azure offers alternative 2nd factor auth but the price was too high. We are still testing Citrix Netscaler offering with CloudBridge for 2nd factor auth and SMS …
Chose SecurID
Simple setup
Cost-effective and provides just the amount of security it promises
Chose SecurID
Duo security does not provide an internal solution, which is what we need in our environment to avoid making outside internet connections from our PCI-DSS environment. This is where RSA shines.
Chose SecurID
I didn't try any other product as RSA is the leader in two-factor token authentication.
Features
Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM)SecurID
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM)
-
Ratings
SecurID
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
ID-Management Access Control00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Password Management00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
ID Risk Management00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM)SecurID
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

1Password
1Password
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM)SecurID
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM)SecurID
Likelihood to Recommend
There are simpler systems out there for card access. The simpler systems are not as granular. There a lot of card access pieces to ACM. ACM also requires a server so if you want a cloud based solution, this is not an option. It's best if you have staff or a local company to support the hardware and software.
Read full review
Works well in a large organization with many employees and devices but may not work so well in smaller organizations due to alternatives that are cheaper and are already provided (such as Microsoft's Azure MFA). Using the soft token is easy and convenient. For a large environment, It has allowed us to have a single app used for authentication for all of our various users, and using the soft token is easy and convenient.
Read full review
Pros
  • Integrate with burg systems
  • Granular for time access
  • Flexible with many types of badges
Read full review
  • RSA SecurID allows me to access network files from remote locations (hotels, other businesses, working from home). This allows me greater productivity and helps me with a work-life balance as I can work later at night or not get so backed up when I'm traveling.
  • RSA SecurID keeps information secure by limiting access to network files
  • RSA SecurID is easy to use with a soft token - one less item to carry around in my travel bag
Read full review
Cons
  • How you set up integration with burg systems
  • SSO
  • Making door double taps easier to set up
Read full review
  • The Android application cannot be easily returned to the original code (if you chose to move to the next code).
  • If misconfigured, it can lock an administrator out of a server.
  • The look and feel of the RSA control center status bar application have a dated feel.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Long story short, does the job. Can use company credentials to setup and access the account for SecurID. Easy to setup and implement. Doesn't have a high learning curve.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Using it very frequently, it's important that its straight forward and I do not have to go through unnecessary hoops to achieve something seemingly simple. Can setup using the company credentials and do not have to setup up a separate account. Setup was fast and easy. GUI is very straight forward and quick.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Their support for onboarding and set-up is quite good. The only issues we tend to have are obtaining new user devices. These need to be planned ahead of time.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Some systems out there are not too granular. They also lacked integration with Google, which we need. With that being said ACM can sometimes make setup too complicated. Double-tap cards for instance take many steps to set up. In other systems it's a one-click setup. ACM is also compatible with Mercury boards. This is a big reason to choose ACM because the boards are not proprietary.
Read full review
RSA SecureID is still widely deployed and the de facto industry standard for 2nd factor authentication. Microsoft Azure offers alternative 2nd factor auth but the price was too high. We are still testing Citrix NetScaler offering with CloudBridge for 2nd factor auth and SMS code to user mobile device so it is yet to be seen as a viable alternative to RSA.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • card access can help to limit physical keys
  • Less staff to unlock doors for events, because now they are scheduled by one person
  • Licensing and installation costs are pricey
Read full review
  • We are pleased with our implementation of RSA Authentication Manager. The deployment process went smooth without many issues.
  • Administration and troubleshooting are very easy using the GUI console.
  • There is enough good quality documentation, training, and online forums are available for our team to refer to in case of any technical issues.
Read full review
ScreenShots